Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

精品东京热,精品动漫无码,精品动漫一区,精品动漫一区二区,精品动漫一区二区三区,精品二三四区,精品福利导航,精品福利導航。

【?? ?? ??? ??】Enter to watch online.Mister Politician Man
Kaleem Hawa ,?? ?? ??? ?? December 16, 2019

Mister Politician Man

On Justin Trudeau’s missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls Thien V
Word Factory W
o
r
d

F
a
c
t
o
r
y

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is fond of saying that “reconciliation isn’t just a word.” But reconciliation without a rearrangement of power is colonialism by another name, one more weapon in the toolkit of the settler: arrival, theft, violence, reprisal, starvation, consolidation, forced integration, erasure, and now, the long hug. In 2015, Indigenous women accounted for 24 percent of all female homicide victims in Canada, and in 2019, Canada’s political and cultural gatekeepers debated what to call this.

Over the summer, the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG) declared that Canada had committed and was committing a genocide, situating the murdered women, girls, and Two-Spirit people—the thousands of deaths and disappearances that have likely gone unrecorded over the decades—in the larger context of the country’s treatment of Indigeneity. In the ceremony announcing the findings of the Inquiry, Chief Commissioner Marion Buller spoke:

The significant, persistent and deliberate pattern of systemic racial and gendered human and indigenous rights violations and abuses perpetuated historically and maintained today by the Canadian state . . . is the cause of the disappearances, murders, and violence experienced by Indigenous women . . . and this is genocide.

The flurry of coverage that followed, of an is-it-or-is-it-not variety, was ostensibly put to rest when Trudeau announced he accepted the findings of the Inquiry, stating that Canada had committed genocide, but taking care to employ the past tense in his acknowledgement so as to indemnify the government from certain legal liabilities. Throughout 2018 and 2019, many U.S. states, including Washington, Minnesota, and Arizona, acknowledged similar epidemics and took steps to build databases around their own cases of murdered and missing women and girls.

The gatekeeping response from across the Canadian political establishment is emblematic of what the new reconciliation industry will look like in the years to come.

A few months later, a new test of the Canadian government’s commitment to Indigenous reconciliation came to a head in the federal court system: the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal had ordered Ottawa to pay compensation to Indigenous children for its discrimination through the on-reserve child welfare system. Trudeau balked, and asked his Ministry of Justice to appeal the ruling through a judicial review, a slap in the face for Indigenous leaders. A member of the Gitksan First Nation, Professor Cindy Blackstock challenged Trudeau to live up to his previous words, to “accept all the Tribunal orders, drop [his] judicial review, and implement the Spirit Bear Plan,” which seeks to end discrimination in the Canadian Public Service and its discriminatory funding of First Nations child and family services.

That Trudeau consistently inhabits two political responses seemingly at odds with each other—acknowledgment and sabotage—represents a signature approach that appeals to a North American vision of how to deal with crimes of the “past.” Appending the label of “genocide” to our treatment of Indigenous peoples remains so subversive because it complicates the dominant imaginary, making it no longer a narrative of pain “allowed” to be spoken by Indigenous peoples, but a present-tense, multi-generational crime necessitating a program of reparations. The gatekeeping response from across the Canadian political establishment is emblematic of what the new reconciliation industry will look like in the years to come.


“Is that an act of genocide? Is it? Is it deliberate, do we want that to happen? Or is our government just that inept and has been that irresponsible to these people over all these years?”

These are the words of Roméo Dallaire, the retired Canadian general who famously led the United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) before its disastrous devolution. When asked about the missing and murdered Indigenous women as genocide, he added, “I’m not comfortable with that,” that genocide must be “a deliberate act of a government to exterminate, deliberately and by force and directly, an ethnicity or a group of human beings. And that meant actually going and slaughtering people.” But Dallaire is wrong. The term genocide comes from the Polish jurist Rapha?l Lemkin and was intended to reflect the multiplicity of ways that communities of human life can be erased. The manner of that erasure was never the primary concern. The United Nation’s 1948 definition of the term includes any of five acts—killing members; inflicting bodily and mental harm; imposing conditions of life calculated to bring about destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures to prevent births; or forcibly transferring children of the group to another group—committed with the “intent to destroy in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”

One of the most effective ways to kill a culture is through violence leveled against women, and the disappearances and deaths of Indigenous women are not the only way this happens—consider the sterilization of Indigenous women in Canadian hospitals. We are predisposed to think of this as violence against individual bodies, rather than violence against a community. But the National Inquiry, like the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) on Canada’s residential school system before it, situates this violence as part of a creeping erasure of Indigenous life. The possession of Indigenous land, the theft of Indigenous children, the domination of Indigenous minds, has always required a semipermeable membrane with a haunting mandate: us in, them out, physically, biologically, and culturally.

The Inquiry outlines the crimes as part of a cumulative and living history, framing genocide in Canada as an act of the state “spanning decades and composed of numerous distinct acts and omissionswhich, in aggregate, violate the international prohibition.” This idea of omission is an important one. Canada’s domestic statute on genocide—the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act—allows failure to act to qualify as actus rea(material elements) necessary for proving genocidal conduct legally. What Indigenous peoples have argued is that Canada has created a permissive culture of Indigenous death, allowing perpetrators—sometimes themselves products of the communities that Canada has broken—to act with impunity.

One of the most effective ways to kill a culture is through violence leveled against women.

Those like Dallaire who use the ineptitude defense are making a case of non-intentionality—that yes, what has happened to Indigenous peoples is horrendous, but really just the product of a broken system, of unthinking or ignorant management. They not only misread the law, but miss the point that to be born a Canadian (or American) is to have your entire existence predicated on the subjugation of another. The Inquiry report presents this settler state violence as baked into a government’s functioning, contradicting the view that these deaths are the product of failure rather than design.

Formally accepting the label of genocide would place Canada in a group of modern self-designators that includes only Germany, Cambodia, and Rwanda. (Ukraine views the Soviet government as the perpetrator of the Holodomor famine; and the Serbian branch of the Bosnian government does not acknowledge the Srebrenica massacre of Muslims as a genocide, though the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia does). As you’d expect, then, objections to the term were out in full force after the release of the Inquiry report, usually taking one of two forms: appeals to historical accuracy and appeals to legal accuracy.

The former position argues that a recognition of genocide in the case of the MMIWG trivializes events like the Holocaust or the Rwandan Genocide. The most high-profile champion of this view has been Irwin Cotler, the Chair of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights, which counts Alan Dershowitz as a senior fellow. In response to the Inquiry report, he said, “if we say everything is a genocide, then nothing is a genocide.”

Cotler is right that the slaughter of millions of Jews or three-quarters of Rwanda’s Tutsi population and the MMIWG are different stories, but his framing also privileges a certain type of suffering, never outright denying the character of the pain experienced by Indigenous peoples but refusing to admit it might befit the same gravity. This is a common impulse. When Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez compared the detention of migrants at the U.S. border with Mexico to concentration camps, it drew criticism from politicians and some gatekeepers within the Jewish community. Writing in Jewish Currents, Zoé Samudzi asked:

As we argue over terminology, we ought to ask ourselves: Is the typology affixed to a structure more important than the material conditions produced? Is the semantic distinction more critical than the urgency of our collective solidarity and intervention?

But we know that “genocide” is more than simply a word, it is also a site of sorrow. In a 2016 lecture at Glendon College, human rights lawyer Payam Akhavan spoke about the deleterious effects of this squabbling:

The Holocaust was a paradigmatic crime, and its legal representation as a transcendent concept made its potent historical legacy capable of appropriation by others. As the ultimate crime, calling the plight of victims “genocide” elevated their demands for justice to a privileged status. Yet, in the killing fields of Bosnia, Rwanda, Darfur, and today, in Iraq and Syria, we witness what are often sterile polemical debates on the genocide label, a pretense of empathy, creating the illusion of progress, while we remain bystanders to radical evil. We reduce the enormity of human suffering to the rationalist credo of law in self-delusional rituals that substitute lofty incantations for meaningful action.

The second argument against the “genocide” label in Canada revolves around the belief that the cases of the MMIWG do not pass muster legally. Some members of the legal community have landed on an alternative framing they feel is sufficiently even-handed: admitting that Indigenous peoples have suffered a “cultural genocide” as at least “a base,” but “fence-sitting” on whether these acts qualify as a legally-consistent full-blown genocide.

What this often misses is why the two terms are separate to begin with. Canada was one of the primary state lobbyists for the removal of “cultural genocide” from the U.N.’s original draft of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. In a 1948 telegram, the Secretary of State for External Affairs in Ottawa wrote to the Canadian delegation at the Palais des Nations in Geneva asking them to spike the convention if it committed to including a prohibition on cultural genocide. It was ultimately left out of the definition. This has always been part of the colonist’s strategy: admonish indigenous peoples for claiming legal protections that were designed to exclude them, codify existing power through law, and then use it as a bludgeon against reparative justice. The Inquiry addresses this objection to the label directly, stating that it “believes that the debate around ‘cultural genocide’ versus ‘real’ genocide is misleading” and a reassertion of sovereignty over Indigenous suffering.

Rather than decry the designation of the epidemic a genocide, we should accept it, and see Canada fight to right its 1948 wrong.

This sovereignty idea is important because there are few domestic recourses available to Indigenous peoples; Canada has attempted to head off legal liability by being cautious about which tenets of international law it integrates into domestic legislation, ultimately only adopting two of the five acts included in the U.N. convention into their own law. Still, the Inquiry has provoked fear from some that its report obligates Canada to launch a national investigation into the ongoing crimes, or be investigated by the Organization of American States or the U.N. Human Rights Office. The gatekeepers would prefer we “address” this with federal policies that will always lie outside the control of Indigenous peoples; the “genocide” label is dangerous precisely because it pushes us to envision a scope of redress outside of this arena.

In the end, of course, this is about power. Political scholar Elizabeth Strakosch argues that the development and implementation of policy in settler states is framed as a second-order debate about responses to exert within the context of already-existing authority over Indigenous peoples, rather than what it is: yet another site where settler colonial sovereignty is reinforced. Here, the political language of “scandal” itself becomes a tool, resituating scrutiny within the framework of government; we end up debating the policies rather than the structure that implements them. This is often coupled with a prejudging of the Inquiry’s findings by claiming that it did not meet its burden of proof. Detractors will say otherwise, but this defensive posturing is often about making sure an investigation is never made.

Why? They are afraid that a new precedent might be set, that a competent international body will recognize, legally, that which makes sense to many of us morally. Rather than decry the designation of the epidemic a genocide, we should accept it, and see Canada fight to right its 1948 wrong, conceding the legal position that the slow, relentless erasure of culture through the traditional machinery of the state—schools, police, healthcare, child services—is a form of “elimination,” of social and political death. But this won’t happen. The government is doing what we expect governments to do in the face of such demands—delay, distract, debate.


When asked about Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s commitment to reconciliation with Indigenous peoples, the prosaic response from members of the Liberal Party of Canada tends to be a list. The Prime Minister has recruited the most Indigenous MPs and has elevated the most Indigenous MPs to serve in his cabinet of any Prime Minister in Canadian history; he has apologized for residential schools in Newfoundland and Labrador; he has apologized for the Inuit tuberculosis outbreaks in the 1950s and 1960s; he has apologized for the hanging of the Tsilhqot’in chiefs; he has apologized for the relocation of the Sayisi Dene in Manitoba; he issues land acknowledgements before his speeches. But a land acknowledgement is just that, an acknowledgement—of land that was stolen, but also, of land that no one intends to return. His is an aesthetic politics—a feel-good deference to the language of change, coupled with the neutering of meaningful reforms.

It’s also impossible to decouple the treatment of Jody Wilson-Raybould, a member of the We Wai Kai First Nation who served as Trudeau’s Minister of Justice—and arguably the most important Indigenous politician in the country’s modern history—from the Prime Minister’s legacy on the “Indigenous issue,” as it is so often pejoratively circumscribed. After objecting to the government lobbying for a non-prosecution clause to protect SNC Lavalin, a corporation headquartered in Québec, Wilson-Raybould was demoted in cabinet and eventually removed from Trudeau’s party in a scandal that engulfed the country. Her ejection was tinged with Trudeau’s narcissism, of an “I made you, and I can unmake you” flavor.

It should have been unsurprising that a woman tasked with leading a Canadian justice system that had utterly failed her own people would be reticent to oversee its further dilution on the issue of corporate non-prosecution. But Wilson-Raybould’s humiliation was ultimately about far more than her “stepping out of line” in a Canadian political system that depends on deference to centralized leadership and “whipping” the votes of largely marginalized colleagues in the House of Commons. The Party’s response would have been different had she been someone else, had her behavior been a less visible marker of the hollowness of their own commitment to “reconciliation” with Indigenous peoples.

After the SNC Lavalin scandal broke last winter, the columnist Paul Wells wrote in Maclean’sabout Canada’s insiderism, seeing the country’s politics as a vassal for the interests of the blue-blooded WASPs of Upper Canada and the Franco-Québecois and Anglo-Montréalais of Lower Canada. This isn’t a new point, nor is it a conservative dog-whistle; Wells was articulating the reality that our country is so often led by a small community of people, in some ways more insular than the warring cloisters of American politics. Why this matters to the MMIWG has everything to do with how this Canadian political imaginary interacts with Indigenous peoples—that is to say, rarely. Reconciliation (as conducted by the settler), then, becomes thought of and fought for in the battleground of the imagination: where do Canadians feel our relationship to our history is headed, are things seemingbetter, and, even more worryingly, how does that make us feel about ourselves?

In The Walrus, Martin Lukacs writes that this “moral feeling” has become a governing strategy for Trudeau’s Liberals. But it is more appropriate to say that this moral feeling is Canada’s new excuse, and the Liberals—always the triangulating centrists of Canadian politics—have simply perfected a political repackaging of an existing narrative. He adds:

But the transformation underway among the Liberal Party, government institutions, and the broader establishment was less a sea change than a shape-shift. Faced with an Indigenous uprising unlike anything in Canadian history, they were prepared to accept, and even help construct, a new public consensus—making a taboo of overt racism, cleansing our public squares of ugly tokens from our past, embracing the resurgence in Indigenous cultural expression, and adopting the language of Indigenous liberation. But, within this consensus, there were several great unmentionables: land, resources, power, and the sharing of any of it. Such a consensus would serve to contain and silence the transformative potential of Indigenous rights—held over vast territories, posing barriers to reckless extraction, and grounded in a vision of a different relationship to each other and the natural world.

This is why Jody Wilson-Raybould’s conscientious objection was so disconcerting to Canadian Liberals: insofar as she served as a stand-in for genuine understanding of Indigenous lives, it left many uneasy to see such a visible symbol of our purported reconciliation defenestrated by Trudeau, proof that the elevation of an Indigenous woman to one of the highest offices in the land was never about empowering her to begin with. For the Liberals, the only acceptable response to her spurning was to attack, gleeful at the early signs that she would lose her election standing as an Independent candidate. That she ultimately won should be a signal to Ottawa that Canadians saw courage in her position against the status quo. Trudeau’s treatment of Wilson-Raybould is a metonym for Trudeau’s treatment of the MMIWG: a cosmetic allyship meeting the cold, hard pavement.

Reconciliation (as conducted by the settler) becomes thought of and fought for in the battleground of the imagination.

Few Canadian politicians have fought the co-option of Indigenous reconciliation by the politics of self-preservation. Trudeau is simply the latest in a long lineage selling a combination of self-flagellation and self-care. The apology for residential schools for instance—finally issued by the previous Prime Minister Stephen Harper—was largely done out of legal obligation to an agreement struck by hispredecessor Prime Minister Paul Martin, who himself was attempting to stave off a major lawsuit being brought by Indigenous survivors. In Martin Lukacs’s latest book, The Trudeau Formula: Seduction and Betrayal in an Age of Discontent, he counts the recent appeal of the Human Rights Tribunal compensation order as at least the eighth timethe Liberals have fought judicial rulings in support of Indigenous reparations.

The fight against reparations exists on various fronts, however. After all, the courts are only one method of redress, and political demands are just as important as legal demands. The Inquiry includes 231 “calls for justice” directed at industries, institutions, media, health-care providers, educators, police, Correctional Service Canada and child welfare workers. In spite of Trudeau’s promises, it is unlikely these will be implemented in their totality or even partially, with a big tent party like the Liberals needing to balance various other political considerations. But imagine for a moment what it might it look like for reconciliation to instead transcendgovernance. Justice Murray Sinclair, who Chaired the TRC, wrote of “a systematic and concerted attempt to extinguish the spirit of Aboriginal peoples.” In this way, genocide is a crime against the soul of Indigenous life, situating its unimaginable world-destroying pain outside the Canadian political structure and hinting at a deeper, collective, almost spiritual obligation that remains owed.

In a cynical sense, this would suggest that Trudeau is, in fact, exactly the man the moment requires: the political figure most able to acknowledge the dimensions of genocide as mourning metaphor and wily enough to limit the dimensions of genocide as legal crime.

It is unsurprising that Indigenous peoples feel condescended to. After the Attawapiskat First Nation declared a state of emergency in July over its poisoned tap water, Indigenous singer Adrian Sutherland wrote a song called “Politician Man.” In it, he croons, “I get tired sometimes, I can’t take no more. You take half my heart and you still want more. . . . Lyin’ to my face, lyin’ to yourself, lyin’ to the people that you said you would help.”

And then he adds, “Hey Mister politician man, whatchu done for me lately?”

1.2949s , 10029.1328125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【?? ?? ??? ??】Enter to watch online.Mister Politician Man,  

Sitemap

Top 国产无套内射视频 | 国内精品久久久久久久999下 | 无码乱人伦一区二区亚洲 | 国产精品日日摸夜夜添夜夜添1国产精品va欧美精品 | 国产av一区二区三区传媒短片 | 精品久久久无码人妻中文字幕边打电话 | 日韩一区二区三区射精-百度 | 欧类av怡春院 | 99久久国产综合精品无码 | 亚洲成色综合网站在线 | 国产成人综合精品 | 国产欧美日韩在线观看一区二区 | 成人区人妻精品一区二欧美毛片 | 亚洲18色成人网站www | 99久久久a片无码国产精品蜜臀 | 国产高潮抽搐在线观看 | 五月色婷婷中文开心字幕 | 日韩欧美一区二区三区免费看 | 色咪咪网站 | 成人在线高清不卡免费视频 | 欧美日韩精品永久在线 | 亚洲中文字幕无码天然素人 | 亚洲精品一二三区-久久 | 国产人妻午夜在线无码 | 亚洲欧美日韩综合精品 | 99久久精品日本一区二区免费网站直播老师欧美综合熟妇99 | 国产精品久久人妻无码网站一区无 | 91秦先生在线观 | 丁香色五月激情综合色丁香色五月激 | 久久国产成人精品麻豆 | 巨胸喷奶水www冈哺乳期 | 国产成人av性色在线影院 | 亚洲精品图片区小说区 | 国产aⅴ无码片毛片一级一区2 | 精品国产一区二区三区香蕉男同 | 亚洲A片V一区二区三区有声 | 国产91在线精品国自产在线 | 黄色三级免费观看 | 久久99精国产一区二区三区四区 | av中文字幕一区二区三区久久 | 九九热在线免费观看 | 91精品人妻一区二区 | 国色天香AV在线观看免费 | 久久成人国产精品免费 | 国产精品成人免费精品自在线观看 | 久久思思97视频 | 亚州一区二区三区三级片 | 国产精品无码av在线永久 | 精品无码人妻一区二区免费 | 日韩黄色免费 | 亚洲欧美国产精 | 久久久久亚洲av无码去区首 | 放荡黄高辣H文NP | 欧美制服丝袜一区 | 中文字幕无码乱人伦 | 国产成熟女人性满足视频 | 国产乱对白精彩在线播放 | 国产亚洲区在线视频观看 | CHINESE色系FREE中国 | 东北老女人大叫爽死啦 | 99久久久无码国产精品免费 | 日日夜夜免费精品视频 | 欧美日韩久久精品一区二区三区四区 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区 | 国内精品久久久一 | 国产乱码精品一区二区三区四川 | 成人性生交大片免费看中文 | 国产不卡视频在线观看 | 日韩高清亚洲日韩精品一区 | 久久久久久综合一区中文字幕 | 日本成本人片免费高清 | 国内精品一卡二卡三卡 | 亚洲永久精品免费ww52com | 欧美视频在线免费观看 | 亚洲国产成人久久综合小说 | 欧美精产国品一二三产品区别 | 久久精品亚洲国产AV涩情 | 国产成人av无码精品 | 国产台湾全黄a一级毛片 | 国产剧情一卡二卡麻豆 | bt免费在线播放 | 空姐内射出白浆10p 抠逼喷水 | 久久久精品国产亚洲成人满18免费网站 | 精品自拍农村熟女少妇图片直播一区专区 | 久久精品一级毛片 | 国产GV无码A片在线观看 | 精品一卡二卡三卡四卡视频区 | 久久久久久无码午夜精品 | 国产不卡一卡2卡三卡4卡乱码 | 四虎影视无码永久免费无码 | 国产精品55夜色66夜色 | 无码一区二区人妻精品做受 | 国产亚洲精品久久久无码网站 | 国产成视频在线观看片 | 放荡乱h伦文粗大hhh高潮 | 精品国产亚洲人成在九九 | 国产av无码专区亚洲av桃花庵 | 成人9久久国产精品品 | 欧美一区二区丝袜 | 国产精品无码护士在线观看 | 精品无码国产一区二区三区 | 色狠狠色综合吹潮 | 久久婷婷五月综合色 | 国产欧美另类第一页 | 天天噜日日噜狠狠噜免费 | 久久人妻夜夜做天天爽 | AV一区二区三区无码 | 国产精品白浆一区二小说 | 亚洲欧美高清精品?ⅴ | 中文天堂在线观看 | 六月丁香七月婷婷 | 波多野结衣乱码中文字幕更新 | av永久天堂一区二区三区 | 国产精品林美惠子在线观看 | 久久久久亚洲av无码蜜臀按摩 | 综合久久国产对白 | 精品AV一区二区三区久久 | 51视频精选全部免费的意义在哪里 | 国产精品亚洲一区在线播放 | 成人免费一级毛片在线播放视频 | 精品国产亚一区二区三区 | 精品国免费一区二区三区 | 欧美精产国品一二三产品特点 | 精品国产福利第一区二区三区 | 日本一本二本大道在线视频网站 | 日本xxxxxxxxx69中国 | 国产欧美日产一区二区三区大全 | 久久久久久一品道精品免费看 | av综合专区亚洲 | 色网址大全123亚洲 色网址导航大全 | 日日干干日日 | 国产三级片精品视频 | 色天使久久综合给合久久色 | 久久亚洲最大成人网4438 | 99久女女精品视 | 丝袜欧美视频首页在线 | 久久精品国产99久久丝袜蜜桃 | 国产真实乱野战免费在线观 | 无码AV一区二区三区在线观看 | 欧美日韩国产不卡在线观看 | 人妻无码久久久久久久久久久 | 日韩av无码免费一二三区 | 国产成熟女人性满足视频 | 国产亚洲美日韩av中文字幕无码成人高清 | 天天精品夜夜精品视频 | 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三 日产精品一二三四区气温 日产乱码一区二区三区在线 | 中文字幕乱人伦视频在线 | 国产日韩欧美动漫自拍区制服 | 波多野结衣中文在线播放 | 91麻豆精品激情在线观看最新 | 国产在线无码一区二区三区视频 | 国产精品一区二区精品一区二区精品一区二区精品 | 亚洲成aⅴ人片 | 91偷拍与自偷拍精品 | 视频一区二区欧美日韩在线 | 亚洲国产成人精品综合 | 国产精品无码无片在线观看 | 91久久精品在这里色伊人 | 亚洲婷婷天堂在线综合 | 视频一区二区三区日韩欧美 | 麻豆久久久9性大片 | 精品综合久久88色鬼首页 | 成人一区在线 | 五月六月丁香婷婷激情 | 波多野结衣中文字幕在线观看 | 国产综合久久一区二区三区 | 国产蜜月一区二区 | 国产亚洲av手机在线播放 | 亚洲免费视频日本一区二区 | 中文字幕按摩做爰 | 丁香五月综合网亚洲综合欧美狠狠 | 高清国产精品热舞在线一区二区三区 | 韩剧甜性涩爱 | 九九亚洲精品 | 日韩在线中文字幕欧美 | 看一级毛片一区二区三区免费 | 久久久久精品国产电影 | 美女解开胸衣露出奶头的游戏 | 国产av色浴 | 国产麻豆文化传媒精品一区 | 久久久精品人妻一区二区三区蜜桃 | 五月丁香婷婷天堂 | 国产精品午夜无码AV在线播放 | 久久综合亚洲精品一区二区 | 国产精品露脸视频观看 | 蜜臀白丝爆浆18禁一区二区三区 | av一区二区三区在线观看 | 九九热久久只有精品2 | 在线不卡免费视频 | 欧美另类又黄又爽的A片 | 无码人妻精品一区二区三区性色 | 97精品人妻一区二区三区香蕉 | 日本工番囗番全彩本成人漫画 | 欧美日韩精品一区二区在线播放蜜臀 | 91久久精品在这里色伊人68 | 麻豆md沈芯语梦境 | www.中文字幕在线 | 国产精品人妻一区二区99 | 蜜臀AV性色A片在线观看 | 欧美一区二区三区导航 | 国产丰满老熟女重口对白 | 国产在线精品一区免费香蕉 | 亚洲日韩精品无码专用网 | 久久精品国产99国产精品 | 精品国产人成在线 | 欧美精产国品一二三产品区别 | 日韩欧美亚洲国产一区二区三区 | 97无码人妻精品免费一区二区 | 乱码视频午夜间在线观看 | 久久996国产精品免费 | 久久中精品中文 | 中文字幕人妻无码一区二区三区 | 美国毛片免费一级久久99国产精品一区二区 | 青青久久精品一本一区人 | 99久久久无码国产精品秋霞网 | 91偷拍与自偷拍精品 | GV无套内射日本帅哥 | 国产精品流白浆喷水 | 国产欧美最新一区二区三区四区 | 高清无码观看日产韩国精品黄色 | 婷婷91精品国产91久久综合 | 日韩高清一区二区在线观看 | 2024婷婷天堂综合区色吧 | 国产无码精品1区 | 亚洲欧洲校园自拍都市 | 波多野结衣高清无码中文456 | 欧美一区二区三区不卡免费 | 日韩 高清 经典 中文 | 国产东北露脸熟妇 | 2024一級特黃色毛片免費看 | 在线观看特色大片免费网站 | 久久精品国产对白国产AV | 成人国产一区二 | 偷拍殴美一区二区三区 | 久久国产精品免费久久 | 亚洲成眠在线观看毛卡片 | 特级做a爰片毛片免费69 | 国产精品亚洲综合色拍 | 毛片在线观看 | 内射老阿姨1区2区3区4区 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产精品亚洲片在线 | 欧美a级大黄片一区二区三区 | 国产乱子伦视频大全亚洲欧美 | 精品丝袜美腿国产一区 | 国产成人欧美日韩在线电影 | 丁香社区五月开心激情婷婷 | 欧美XXXXX无码黑寡妇 | 人妻被夫前侵犯一区二区 | 久久久久无码精品国产av | 精品无码一区二区三区蜜臀 | 国产精品国产成人三级 | 白嫩无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪区 | 欧美激情图区 | 中文字幕一区二区三区在线视频 | 国产精品无码中出一区二区三区 | 国产又粗又黄又爽的A片动漫软件 | 永久免费观看不收费的软件 | 在线91精品亚洲网站精品成人 | 亚洲国产精品无码久久久午夜 | 国产精品久久久久久夜夜夜夜 | 97精品人妻系列无码人妻 | 91大片淫黄大片 | 国产人妻精品无码AV在线浪潮 | 国产成人h片视频在线观看 国产成人h视频在线观看 | 波多野结衣六乱 | 国产成人av电影在线观看第页 | 欧美乱妇高清无乱码免费 | 国产高清无码在线 | 波多野结衣超清无码专区 | 日本三级免费电影一区二区三区 | 久久精品国波多野结衣 | 国产成年女人毛片 | 久久99AV无色码人妻蜜柚 | 成人片黄网站a毛片免费观看 | 中文字幕A片视频一区二区 中文字幕va一区二区三区 | 香蕉视频一区二区三区 | 男人舔女人的阴部黄色骚虎视频 | 美国毛片毛片全部免费 | 国产欧美日韩精品视频一区二区 | 日韩一区二区三区视频在线播放 | 91视频亚洲无码精彩视频 | 国产一区二区三区免费视频 | 精品国产中文在线二区三区四区 | 国产女人毛多水多A片视频 国产女人毛片好多水 | 五月丁香五月伦理 | 2024伊人查蕉在线观看 | 欧美又大又色又爽AAAA片 | 精品一区二区三区在线观看l | 欧美激情一区二区三区成人 | 看黄子片wwwabc300| 国产av尤物| 亚洲一区二区在线成人 | 中文字幕精品1在线 | 久久国产乱子乱免费无码 | 国产欧美精品一区二区三区 | 在线成人中文字幕 | 久久久久亚洲av无码专区首jn | 国产亚洲亚洲精品777 | 青青青在线视频国产 | 一个人看的www免费视频动漫 | 天天综合日韩中文字幕婚闹 | 国产麻豆剧传媒视 | 精品国产一区二区三区麻豆小说 | 亚洲中文字幕在线第六区 | 一区二区三区亚洲中文字幕 | 人妻丰满精品一区二区A片 人妻丰满熟 | 日韩激情欧美一区二区 | 日日爱669 | 男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸A片 | 成av人片在线观看无app | 久久99精品久久久久久水蜜 | 国产美女流白浆的免费视 | 91精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产精品热久久高潮AV袁孑怡 | 精品无码一区二区三区爱与 | 中文字幕一区二区三区精华液 | 日本大片免费视频在线 | 久久影院毛片一区二区 | 在线色综合 | 55夜色66成年视频观看免费 | 久亚洲AV无码专区A片 | 国产香蕉一区二区在线网站 | 国产精品久久人妻无码网站一区无 | 国产精品伦一区二区三级 | 欧美 亚洲 有码中文字幕 | 婷婷久久综合九色综合伊人色 | 国产精品久久午夜夜伦鲁鲁 | 亚洲精品白浆高清久久久久久 | 欧美婷婷五月基地 | 国产精品无码专区在线播放 | 狠狠骚 | 色欲国产麻豆精品AV免费 | 少妇人妻系列无码专区系列免费观看 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区日产 | 日产无码AV在线观看 | 久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆毛 | v一本久道久久波多野结衣 v一区二区三区 | 国产50岁熟妇露脸 | 欧洲精品va无码一区二区三区 | 高清有码国产一区二区 | 成人黄色小视频在线观看 | 精品日韩在线观看 | a级毛片在线高清观看 | 日韩激情成人 | 偷拍激情视频一区 | 伊人狠狠色丁香综合尤物 | 午夜福利日本一区二区无码 | 国产a级理论片 | 巨爆乳中文字幕爆乳区 | 国产精品国产三级国产无毒 | 亚洲欧美日韩国产毛片无码 | 亚洲性免费 | 精品无码久久久久国产三级网 | 国产成人精品一区二区a片带套 | 国产无套乱子伦精彩是白视频 | 2024久久伊人精品中文字幕有 | 国产偷抇久久一级精品a片 国产偷国产 | 国产无人区卡一卡二卡三乱码网站 | 91超级碰| 91精品日韩人妻无码久久不卡 | 国产盗摄视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧洲日产国码久在线 | 偷拍福利一区二区每日更新 | 国产a久久秘 | 久久久久人妻精品一区三寸 | 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁AV麻豆 | 免费观看国产成人99网视频 | 伊人角狠狠狠狠 | 国产自国产自愉自愉免费24区 | 精品久久国产视频 | 日产精品卡二卡三卡四卡区 | 99热成人精品国产免男男 | 日韩一区二区三区在线欧洲 | 亚洲免费影院第一第二 | 加勒比精品无码 | av无码播放一区 | 国产亚洲区在线视频观看 | 欧美丰满少妇人妻精品 | 视频二区日韩 | 久久综合精品国产一区二区三区无 | 少妇高潮毛片免费看A片 | 无码成人专区在线观看 | 国产成人精选视频在线观看 | 黑人特黄AA完整性大片 | 爱豆直击国产精品原创av片国产 | 涩aa亚久免费精品一二三区 | 亚洲国产成人资源在线观看 | 国产人妖在线播放 | 日产精品高潮呻吟AV久久 | 成年人国产视频 | 国产三级2024在线观看 | 精品女同一区二区三区在线 | 香港三级日本三级妇人三级 | 国产精品亚洲日韩au在线 | 精品免费看 | 久久水蜜桃 | 无码av永久免费专区不卡 | 天美传媒MV视频播放 | 精品一区中文字幕乱码 | 成人a一级毛片免费看 | 蜜臀精品无码av在线播放 | 国产无套粉嫩白浆在线观看 | 老湿机69福利 | 亚洲观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品久久麻豆蜜桃 | 波多野结衣无码中文字幕 | 精品久久久久水蜜桃一二三 | 国产午夜精品一区二区不卡 | 国产精品亚洲第一区二区三区 | 日本欧美一区 | 欧美熟妇乱人伦A片免费高清 | a级国产电影在线 | 中文字幕少妇偷乱视频在线 | 国产成人免费ā片在 | 超碰国产精品一区二页 | 精品成人在线观看 | 国产成a人亚洲精品无码樱花 | av无遮挡亚洲av色香蕉 | 日本无卡v免费 | 国产成人自拍视频在线观看 | 亚洲A片V一区二区三区有声 | 性猛交富婆ⅹxxx乱大交 | 人妖欧美一区二区 | 国产精品第1页 | 女人张开腿让男人桶爽的 | 香港日本三级在线播放 | 黑人外教啪啪中国女留学生 | 精品国产乱码久久久久乱码 | 免费老外的毛片清高 | 好爽好紧好大的免费视频国产 | 欧美日韩国产精品系列 | 交换朋友夫妻 | 国产欧美高清一区二区三区 | 成人乱码一区二区三区AV0 | 国产精品三级一区二区三区 | 久久久久人妻一区精品伊人 | 国产精品免费大片一区二区 | av无码天一区二区一三区 | 国产精品一码二码三码在线 | 青青热久久国产久精品 | 蜜桃国产视频一区二区三区三 | 亚洲精品无码视频在线观看 | 东京热无码精品一区二区 | 五月天丁香花婷婷视频网 | av无码免费网站 | 国产91久久九九免费精品无码 | 98久久无码一区人妻A片蜜 | 精品国产国产综合精品 | 欧美日韩国产专区 | 日本一道本不卡免费播放 | 99无码熟妇丰满人妻啪啪 | 国产成人禁片在线观看 | 成人精品视频在线 | 亚洲第一卡二新区乱码 | 国产精品福利区一区二区三区四 | 91久久精品国产一区 | 成人影片麻豆国产影片免费 | 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区久久 | 久久国产精品亚洲国产女人 | 精品久久人妻少妇 | 亚洲欧美激情精品一区二区 | 国产性夜夜性夜夜爽91 | 久久中文字幕人妻丝袜系列 | 强奷乱码欧妇女中文字幕熟女 | 精品无码乱码AV | 男女AA片免费 | 2024亚洲人妻无码在线视频 | 91精品啪国产在线观看免费牛牛 | 欧美在线观看免费人成 | xxxx熟妇三级melody日本在线 | 免费黄色小网站 | 国产亚洲精品久久久性色情软件 | 91麻豆国产高清 | 精品久久国产老人久久综合 | 国产1卡2卡三卡四卡久久网站 | 国产精品综合色区小说 | 乱理片 最新乱理片2024 | 国产精品人妻无码 | 久久久国产免费影院 | 亚洲另类春色国产精品 | 国产精品人妻出轨 | 高清国产精品人妻一区二区 | 特级黄色毛片 | 国产精品亚洲欧美高清 | 丝袜无码制服人妻精品 | 91精品国产麻豆国产自产在线 | 国产亚洲麻豆精品AA片在线观看 | 亚洲日韩日本中文在线 | 国产成人午夜精品5599 | 国产无码在线视频高清无删减 | 东京热无码人妻一区二区三区av | 国产成年女一区二区三区 | 97国产精品无码免费视频 | 亚洲一级视频在线观看 | 日本免费不卡一区 | 久操网在线 | 中文字幕乱码熟妇五十中出 | 国产社区视频在线永久免费观看 | 黄色毛片在线观看 | 一区二区三区好的精华液杨超越 | 91成人自拍国产精品一页 | 久久毛片网站 | 狠狠干夜夜夜 人人干天天日天天干 | 国内精品卡一卡二卡三 | 欧美日韩国产精品系列 | 精品久久免费一区二 | 国色天乡官网 | 丝袜自慰一区二区三区 | 亚洲成人毛茸茸bbxx | 国内精品一卡二卡三卡抖 | 91偷拍与自偷拍 | 国产成年女人特黄特色大片免费 | 亚洲一区二区三区 | 二区无码国产97人妻人人做人碰人人爽 | 中文人妻熟女波多野结衣 | 成人免费无码h在线观看不卡 | 内射白浆一区二区在 | 国产精品XXXXX免费A片 | 无码日韩人妻av一区二区三 | 美女一区二区三区久久久 | 国产欧美日韩在线视频重口味 | 久久久久亚洲av无码专区 | 久久五月天综合 | 蜜臀v一区二区日韩 | 国产日韩高清制服一区 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品专区52 | 国产高潮抽搐在线观看 | 四虎影视最新2024在线观看 | 国产精品密播放国产免费看 | 国产色情久久久久久久久 | 国产系列丝袜熟女精品视频 | 日韩视频第二页 | 成人性视频欧美一区二区三区 | 国产喷水1区2区3区咪咪爱av | 国产精品久久久久久久久ktv | 成年丰满熟妇午夜免费视频 | 亚洲精品 | 自拍乱伦免费影视 | 日韩精品专区在线影院重磅 | 91成人综合在线 | 欧美日韩整片中文字幕 | 国产精品制服诱惑 | 少妇人妻偷人精精品系列 | 国产精东剧天美 | 少妇av一区二区三区无码 | 可以直接看的av网址站 | 制服丝袜亚洲无码在线视频 | 91久久人人爽亚洲精品美女 | 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 久久久噜噜噜久久熟女aa片 | 精品福利视频一区二区三区 | av鲁丝国产无码在线观看 | 97九色| 日韩精品久久久肉伦网站 | 99久久国语对白精品露脸 | 成人国产一区二区三区 | 狠狠色狠狠色综合日日小说 | 国产高清无码在线免费看 | 亚洲综合欧美在线一区在线播放 | 成人乱码一区二区三区四区 | 国产精品国产精品国产专区不卡 | 91无套极品外围在线播放 | 久久久久久亚洲精品 | 精品久久久久久中文字幕无码软件 | 美腿丝袜国产精品第一页 | 欧美成人A片免费无码毛片 欧美成人a片在线乱码视频久久久久久人妻一区二区三区 | 亚洲另类伦春色综合电影 | 91麻豆精品一二三区在线国语 | 91精品国产自产91精品资源 | 婷婷人妻精品一区二区三区 | 国产浓毛大泬熟妇视频 | 久久久久久久尹人综合网亚洲 | 亚洲欧美日韩另类在线播放 | 久久久久超碰综合亚洲 | 中文字幕人成乱在线视频 | 亚洲性无码av在线 | 国产丰满麻豆videossex | 国产一区日本二区欧美三区 | 久久久精品区二区三区免费9亚洲国产婷婷香蕉久久久久久 | 老头把我添高潮了A片故事 老头与老太性hd | 麻豆一区区三区四区产品精品蜜桃 | 国产真实乱系列 | 成年黄网站18 | 中文字幕亚洲乱码熟 | FREEZEFRAME丰满老妇 | 国产aⅴ激情无码久久久无码 | 久久久久狠狠色精品 | 欧美视频在线一区 | 国产成人无码精品一区在线观看 | 精品一区二区三区免费观看 | 国产对白老熟女视频 | 久久久久久久aⅴ无码免费网站 | 国产中文精品字幕自在自线 | 永久免费观看不收费的软件 | 婷婷五月久久丁香国产综合 | 无码纯肉视频在线观看 | 久久久久久久精品一区二 | 国产成人精品免费视频大全动漫 | 另类色视频 | 在线播放一区二区不卡三区 | 久久亚洲AV无码日韩区 | 精品国产自在现线拍一本 | 精品人妻无码专区视频网站 | 久久久久无码精品国产软件 | 亚洲精品午夜高清影院 | 少妇性荡欲午夜性开放视频剧场 | 丰满少妇三级全黄 | a码片全部免费无码播放 | 亚洲国产一卡2卡3卡4卡5公司 | 国产熟妇搡BBBB搡BBBB搡 | 综合人妻久久一区二区精品 | 制服丝袜美腿一区二区 | 久久精品国产曰本波多野结衣 | 女人十八毛片A片久久18 | 香蕉天天人人精品综合 | 18禁裸体无遮挡无码网站 | 国产91精品一区二区麻豆观看 | 91精品第一国产综合精品 | 中文字幕无码一二三 | 精品国产一区二区av麻豆不卡 | 久久久午夜精品福利内容 | 亚洲三级在线中文字幕 | 国产熟女露脸大叫高潮 | 国产精品日韩欧美久久综合 | 亚洲熟妇无码一区二区三区 | 成人无码精品一区二区在线观看 | 一区二区三区黄色 | 久久久黄片免费看 | 亚洲福利专区 | 久久五月精品 | 亚洲日本欧美综合在线一电视剧在线观看 | 无码人妻精品一区二区三区A片 | 人与禽性视频77777 | 国产精品麻豆网站 | 影音先锋av资源男人站 | 一级毛片免费在线观看 | 国产成人亚洲精品乱码在线观看 | 99无套内射中出生娃视频 | 国产av夜夜欢一区二区三区 | 99久久精品免费看国产高清 | 国产精品夜夜春夜夜爽久久小说 | 日本亚洲欧洲色情 | 无码成人性爽XO视频在线观看 | 成人网站在线免费观看 | 久久国产综合精品swag蓝导航 | 婷婷激情综合色五月久久 | 中文人妻有码无码人妻 | 一区二区三区免费视频网站 | 成人欧美一区二区三区1314 | 四虎影视在线观看芭蕉 | 亚洲欧美日本综合 | 国产蜜臀av在线一区二区三区 | 国产婷婷精品AV在线 | 丁香色婷婷国产精品视频 | 成人精品亚洲人成在线 | 色窝窝亚洲AV在线观看 | 人妻丰满av无码久久不卡 | 亚洲国产成人丁香五月激情 | 欧美一区二区三区免费不卡 | 国产精品成人一区二区 | 国精产品W灬源码A片伊在线 | 人妻久久久精品系列A片 | 国产中文真人一级a爱做片 国产中文制服丝袜另类 | 99久久久无码国产精品性蜜奴 | 精品无码网址免费不卡 | 国产色精品久久人妻无码看 | 国产丝袜在线观看免费完整版 | 国产精品久久久久精品日日 | 2024国自产一点都不卡 | 久久人妻中文字幕公开 | 日韩一区二区在线视频 | 久久精品一区二区无码AV | 中文天堂最新版在线www | 欧美三级经典免费播放 | 91精品国产亚一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产成人不卡在线 | 国产aⅴ视频一区二区三区 国产aⅴ丝袜一区二区三区 | 国内精品一卡二卡三卡抖 | 熟女视频人妻欧美国产精品麻豆成人a | 亚洲欧美综合国产精品一区 | 久久久久久国产精品视频 | 国产在线观看精品 | 色综合久久超碰色婷婷 | 婷婷激情网站 | 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁2024 | 亚洲最大的福利网站在线观看 | 精品成人毛片一区二区视 | 国产欧洲野花视频WWW | 强奸乱伦欧美激情一区二区 | 国产精品国产香蕉在线观看网 | 国产亚洲日韩网曝欧 | 久久久久亚洲av无码专区 | 国产成人精品播放视频 | 欧美日韩国产高清一区二区三区 | 99久久66久久精品国产片 | 亚洲性夜色噜噜噜在线观看不卡 | 99免费吃奶五月激情狠狠干 | 97无码欧美熟妇人妻蜜 | 久久久这里只有免费精品2024 | 精品产品亚洲欧美一区二区三区 | a级毛片中文字幕不卡 | 亚洲精品天堂在线观看 | 久久国产自偷自偷免费一区调 | www动漫女人欧美日本xxxx成人精品一区日本无码 | 99视频精品全国在线观看 | 久久久99精品久久久久久 | 日本人妻中文字幕乱码系 | 国产视频一区二区三区四区五 | 18国产丰满xxx毛片成人内射国产免费观看 | 亚洲精品无码久久久久久 | 国产欧美综合在线区专区 | 国产精品久久久久久夜夜夜夜 | 日本三级吃奶头添泬无码 | 欧美成人国产一区二区 | 毛片三级在线观看 | 波多野结衣dvd在线播放 | 国产欧美日韩黄片免费观看 | 涩涩爱涩涩片影院 | 91精品一区二区综合在线 | 精品亚洲aⅴ无码午夜在线 精品亚洲aⅴ无码午夜在线观看 | 国产裸体裸美女无遮挡网站 | 天天草天天干天天爱 | 动漫精品无码精品一区二区 | 久久久国产99久久国产一 | 久久久99精品成人片中文字幕 | 日韩欧美a∨中文字幕国产自产一区c | 视频一区二区三区欧美日韩 | 国产欧美精品一区二区三区 | 日韩在线精彩视频在线观看 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区久久 | 91天天综合网 | 亚洲国产精品精华 | 精品国产精品国产自在久国产 | 精品国产ⅴ无码大片在线观看 | 97视频在线观看视频 | 调教二区的影院xxxx精品中文字幕av人妻少妇一区二区 | 成人片黄色大片 | 中文字幕无码一二三 | 欧美一区二区三区导航 | 日本在线视频一区二区三区 | 中文国产 | 91精品国产乱码久久无码 | 岛国岛国免费V片在线观看 岛国电影一区二区三区口碑 | 69久久夜色精品国产69网站 | 欧美日韩精品久久久免费观看 | 成人中文乱幕日产无线码 | 中文字幕一区二区高清在线 | 中文字幕无码不卡一区二区三区 | 久久国产欧美日韩精品图片 | 91精品日本久久久久久 | 国产大屁股喷水视频在线观看 | 久久久久无码精品国产软件 | 性线免费观看视频成熟 | 欧美三级网址视频在线看 | 久久久久久亚洲aⅴ无码软件 | 丰满熟妇乱又伦精品 | 视频高清无码 | 国产高清精品91在线 | 日韩一区二区丰满人妻在线不 | 99久久九九社区精品 | 久久久国产精品网站 | 国产又粗又爽又猛的视频A片 | 久久精品无码一区二区无码三区 | 国产精品成人一区二区三区视频 | 国产一区二区三区四区精华液毛 | 在线播放无码后入内射少妇 | 国产精品亚洲色婷婷久久99精品 | 无人区码一码二码三MBA智库 | 永久免费精品精品永久夜色 | 波多野结衣家庭教师秒播 | a级视频不卡无遮挡 | 国产精品成人观看视频免费 | 国产一区二区三区不卡在线观看 | 国内精品久久久久久影院 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久浪潮小说 | 亚洲一区综合图区 | 国产精品人人做人人爽 | 亚洲蜜桃v妇女 | 成人黄网站片免费视频在哪看 | 日韩一区二区三区乱码毛片 | 亚洲一区二区在线播放 | 久久久精品电影中文字幕 | 国产卡二区三卡乱码 | 免费看国产曰批40分钟 | 国产一区二区久久精品 | 香蕉影视色多多 | 国产a级毛片体验区 | 国产欧美一二三区男女交配 | a级毛片免费看久久 | 毛片网站免费 | 自由夫人在线观看 | 暴力强j激烈反抗av 暴露放荡的娇妻 | 欧美日韩国产人成在线观看 | 天堂资源在线官网资源 | 成人av中文字幕精品久久 | 久久青草亚洲av无码麻豆 | 制服在线无码专区 | 亚洲日本中文字幕乱码在线 |