Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

精品东京热,精品动漫无码,精品动漫一区,精品动漫一区二区,精品动漫一区二区三区,精品二三四区,精品福利导航,精品福利導航。

【?? ?? ??? ??】Enter to watch online.Mister Politician Man
Kaleem Hawa ,?? ?? ??? ?? December 16, 2019

Mister Politician Man

On Justin Trudeau’s missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls Thien V
Word Factory W
o
r
d

F
a
c
t
o
r
y

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is fond of saying that “reconciliation isn’t just a word.” But reconciliation without a rearrangement of power is colonialism by another name, one more weapon in the toolkit of the settler: arrival, theft, violence, reprisal, starvation, consolidation, forced integration, erasure, and now, the long hug. In 2015, Indigenous women accounted for 24 percent of all female homicide victims in Canada, and in 2019, Canada’s political and cultural gatekeepers debated what to call this.

Over the summer, the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG) declared that Canada had committed and was committing a genocide, situating the murdered women, girls, and Two-Spirit people—the thousands of deaths and disappearances that have likely gone unrecorded over the decades—in the larger context of the country’s treatment of Indigeneity. In the ceremony announcing the findings of the Inquiry, Chief Commissioner Marion Buller spoke:

The significant, persistent and deliberate pattern of systemic racial and gendered human and indigenous rights violations and abuses perpetuated historically and maintained today by the Canadian state . . . is the cause of the disappearances, murders, and violence experienced by Indigenous women . . . and this is genocide.

The flurry of coverage that followed, of an is-it-or-is-it-not variety, was ostensibly put to rest when Trudeau announced he accepted the findings of the Inquiry, stating that Canada had committed genocide, but taking care to employ the past tense in his acknowledgement so as to indemnify the government from certain legal liabilities. Throughout 2018 and 2019, many U.S. states, including Washington, Minnesota, and Arizona, acknowledged similar epidemics and took steps to build databases around their own cases of murdered and missing women and girls.

The gatekeeping response from across the Canadian political establishment is emblematic of what the new reconciliation industry will look like in the years to come.

A few months later, a new test of the Canadian government’s commitment to Indigenous reconciliation came to a head in the federal court system: the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal had ordered Ottawa to pay compensation to Indigenous children for its discrimination through the on-reserve child welfare system. Trudeau balked, and asked his Ministry of Justice to appeal the ruling through a judicial review, a slap in the face for Indigenous leaders. A member of the Gitksan First Nation, Professor Cindy Blackstock challenged Trudeau to live up to his previous words, to “accept all the Tribunal orders, drop [his] judicial review, and implement the Spirit Bear Plan,” which seeks to end discrimination in the Canadian Public Service and its discriminatory funding of First Nations child and family services.

That Trudeau consistently inhabits two political responses seemingly at odds with each other—acknowledgment and sabotage—represents a signature approach that appeals to a North American vision of how to deal with crimes of the “past.” Appending the label of “genocide” to our treatment of Indigenous peoples remains so subversive because it complicates the dominant imaginary, making it no longer a narrative of pain “allowed” to be spoken by Indigenous peoples, but a present-tense, multi-generational crime necessitating a program of reparations. The gatekeeping response from across the Canadian political establishment is emblematic of what the new reconciliation industry will look like in the years to come.


“Is that an act of genocide? Is it? Is it deliberate, do we want that to happen? Or is our government just that inept and has been that irresponsible to these people over all these years?”

These are the words of Roméo Dallaire, the retired Canadian general who famously led the United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) before its disastrous devolution. When asked about the missing and murdered Indigenous women as genocide, he added, “I’m not comfortable with that,” that genocide must be “a deliberate act of a government to exterminate, deliberately and by force and directly, an ethnicity or a group of human beings. And that meant actually going and slaughtering people.” But Dallaire is wrong. The term genocide comes from the Polish jurist Rapha?l Lemkin and was intended to reflect the multiplicity of ways that communities of human life can be erased. The manner of that erasure was never the primary concern. The United Nation’s 1948 definition of the term includes any of five acts—killing members; inflicting bodily and mental harm; imposing conditions of life calculated to bring about destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures to prevent births; or forcibly transferring children of the group to another group—committed with the “intent to destroy in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”

One of the most effective ways to kill a culture is through violence leveled against women, and the disappearances and deaths of Indigenous women are not the only way this happens—consider the sterilization of Indigenous women in Canadian hospitals. We are predisposed to think of this as violence against individual bodies, rather than violence against a community. But the National Inquiry, like the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) on Canada’s residential school system before it, situates this violence as part of a creeping erasure of Indigenous life. The possession of Indigenous land, the theft of Indigenous children, the domination of Indigenous minds, has always required a semipermeable membrane with a haunting mandate: us in, them out, physically, biologically, and culturally.

The Inquiry outlines the crimes as part of a cumulative and living history, framing genocide in Canada as an act of the state “spanning decades and composed of numerous distinct acts and omissionswhich, in aggregate, violate the international prohibition.” This idea of omission is an important one. Canada’s domestic statute on genocide—the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act—allows failure to act to qualify as actus rea(material elements) necessary for proving genocidal conduct legally. What Indigenous peoples have argued is that Canada has created a permissive culture of Indigenous death, allowing perpetrators—sometimes themselves products of the communities that Canada has broken—to act with impunity.

One of the most effective ways to kill a culture is through violence leveled against women.

Those like Dallaire who use the ineptitude defense are making a case of non-intentionality—that yes, what has happened to Indigenous peoples is horrendous, but really just the product of a broken system, of unthinking or ignorant management. They not only misread the law, but miss the point that to be born a Canadian (or American) is to have your entire existence predicated on the subjugation of another. The Inquiry report presents this settler state violence as baked into a government’s functioning, contradicting the view that these deaths are the product of failure rather than design.

Formally accepting the label of genocide would place Canada in a group of modern self-designators that includes only Germany, Cambodia, and Rwanda. (Ukraine views the Soviet government as the perpetrator of the Holodomor famine; and the Serbian branch of the Bosnian government does not acknowledge the Srebrenica massacre of Muslims as a genocide, though the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia does). As you’d expect, then, objections to the term were out in full force after the release of the Inquiry report, usually taking one of two forms: appeals to historical accuracy and appeals to legal accuracy.

The former position argues that a recognition of genocide in the case of the MMIWG trivializes events like the Holocaust or the Rwandan Genocide. The most high-profile champion of this view has been Irwin Cotler, the Chair of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights, which counts Alan Dershowitz as a senior fellow. In response to the Inquiry report, he said, “if we say everything is a genocide, then nothing is a genocide.”

Cotler is right that the slaughter of millions of Jews or three-quarters of Rwanda’s Tutsi population and the MMIWG are different stories, but his framing also privileges a certain type of suffering, never outright denying the character of the pain experienced by Indigenous peoples but refusing to admit it might befit the same gravity. This is a common impulse. When Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez compared the detention of migrants at the U.S. border with Mexico to concentration camps, it drew criticism from politicians and some gatekeepers within the Jewish community. Writing in Jewish Currents, Zoé Samudzi asked:

As we argue over terminology, we ought to ask ourselves: Is the typology affixed to a structure more important than the material conditions produced? Is the semantic distinction more critical than the urgency of our collective solidarity and intervention?

But we know that “genocide” is more than simply a word, it is also a site of sorrow. In a 2016 lecture at Glendon College, human rights lawyer Payam Akhavan spoke about the deleterious effects of this squabbling:

The Holocaust was a paradigmatic crime, and its legal representation as a transcendent concept made its potent historical legacy capable of appropriation by others. As the ultimate crime, calling the plight of victims “genocide” elevated their demands for justice to a privileged status. Yet, in the killing fields of Bosnia, Rwanda, Darfur, and today, in Iraq and Syria, we witness what are often sterile polemical debates on the genocide label, a pretense of empathy, creating the illusion of progress, while we remain bystanders to radical evil. We reduce the enormity of human suffering to the rationalist credo of law in self-delusional rituals that substitute lofty incantations for meaningful action.

The second argument against the “genocide” label in Canada revolves around the belief that the cases of the MMIWG do not pass muster legally. Some members of the legal community have landed on an alternative framing they feel is sufficiently even-handed: admitting that Indigenous peoples have suffered a “cultural genocide” as at least “a base,” but “fence-sitting” on whether these acts qualify as a legally-consistent full-blown genocide.

What this often misses is why the two terms are separate to begin with. Canada was one of the primary state lobbyists for the removal of “cultural genocide” from the U.N.’s original draft of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. In a 1948 telegram, the Secretary of State for External Affairs in Ottawa wrote to the Canadian delegation at the Palais des Nations in Geneva asking them to spike the convention if it committed to including a prohibition on cultural genocide. It was ultimately left out of the definition. This has always been part of the colonist’s strategy: admonish indigenous peoples for claiming legal protections that were designed to exclude them, codify existing power through law, and then use it as a bludgeon against reparative justice. The Inquiry addresses this objection to the label directly, stating that it “believes that the debate around ‘cultural genocide’ versus ‘real’ genocide is misleading” and a reassertion of sovereignty over Indigenous suffering.

Rather than decry the designation of the epidemic a genocide, we should accept it, and see Canada fight to right its 1948 wrong.

This sovereignty idea is important because there are few domestic recourses available to Indigenous peoples; Canada has attempted to head off legal liability by being cautious about which tenets of international law it integrates into domestic legislation, ultimately only adopting two of the five acts included in the U.N. convention into their own law. Still, the Inquiry has provoked fear from some that its report obligates Canada to launch a national investigation into the ongoing crimes, or be investigated by the Organization of American States or the U.N. Human Rights Office. The gatekeepers would prefer we “address” this with federal policies that will always lie outside the control of Indigenous peoples; the “genocide” label is dangerous precisely because it pushes us to envision a scope of redress outside of this arena.

In the end, of course, this is about power. Political scholar Elizabeth Strakosch argues that the development and implementation of policy in settler states is framed as a second-order debate about responses to exert within the context of already-existing authority over Indigenous peoples, rather than what it is: yet another site where settler colonial sovereignty is reinforced. Here, the political language of “scandal” itself becomes a tool, resituating scrutiny within the framework of government; we end up debating the policies rather than the structure that implements them. This is often coupled with a prejudging of the Inquiry’s findings by claiming that it did not meet its burden of proof. Detractors will say otherwise, but this defensive posturing is often about making sure an investigation is never made.

Why? They are afraid that a new precedent might be set, that a competent international body will recognize, legally, that which makes sense to many of us morally. Rather than decry the designation of the epidemic a genocide, we should accept it, and see Canada fight to right its 1948 wrong, conceding the legal position that the slow, relentless erasure of culture through the traditional machinery of the state—schools, police, healthcare, child services—is a form of “elimination,” of social and political death. But this won’t happen. The government is doing what we expect governments to do in the face of such demands—delay, distract, debate.


When asked about Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s commitment to reconciliation with Indigenous peoples, the prosaic response from members of the Liberal Party of Canada tends to be a list. The Prime Minister has recruited the most Indigenous MPs and has elevated the most Indigenous MPs to serve in his cabinet of any Prime Minister in Canadian history; he has apologized for residential schools in Newfoundland and Labrador; he has apologized for the Inuit tuberculosis outbreaks in the 1950s and 1960s; he has apologized for the hanging of the Tsilhqot’in chiefs; he has apologized for the relocation of the Sayisi Dene in Manitoba; he issues land acknowledgements before his speeches. But a land acknowledgement is just that, an acknowledgement—of land that was stolen, but also, of land that no one intends to return. His is an aesthetic politics—a feel-good deference to the language of change, coupled with the neutering of meaningful reforms.

It’s also impossible to decouple the treatment of Jody Wilson-Raybould, a member of the We Wai Kai First Nation who served as Trudeau’s Minister of Justice—and arguably the most important Indigenous politician in the country’s modern history—from the Prime Minister’s legacy on the “Indigenous issue,” as it is so often pejoratively circumscribed. After objecting to the government lobbying for a non-prosecution clause to protect SNC Lavalin, a corporation headquartered in Québec, Wilson-Raybould was demoted in cabinet and eventually removed from Trudeau’s party in a scandal that engulfed the country. Her ejection was tinged with Trudeau’s narcissism, of an “I made you, and I can unmake you” flavor.

It should have been unsurprising that a woman tasked with leading a Canadian justice system that had utterly failed her own people would be reticent to oversee its further dilution on the issue of corporate non-prosecution. But Wilson-Raybould’s humiliation was ultimately about far more than her “stepping out of line” in a Canadian political system that depends on deference to centralized leadership and “whipping” the votes of largely marginalized colleagues in the House of Commons. The Party’s response would have been different had she been someone else, had her behavior been a less visible marker of the hollowness of their own commitment to “reconciliation” with Indigenous peoples.

After the SNC Lavalin scandal broke last winter, the columnist Paul Wells wrote in Maclean’sabout Canada’s insiderism, seeing the country’s politics as a vassal for the interests of the blue-blooded WASPs of Upper Canada and the Franco-Québecois and Anglo-Montréalais of Lower Canada. This isn’t a new point, nor is it a conservative dog-whistle; Wells was articulating the reality that our country is so often led by a small community of people, in some ways more insular than the warring cloisters of American politics. Why this matters to the MMIWG has everything to do with how this Canadian political imaginary interacts with Indigenous peoples—that is to say, rarely. Reconciliation (as conducted by the settler), then, becomes thought of and fought for in the battleground of the imagination: where do Canadians feel our relationship to our history is headed, are things seemingbetter, and, even more worryingly, how does that make us feel about ourselves?

In The Walrus, Martin Lukacs writes that this “moral feeling” has become a governing strategy for Trudeau’s Liberals. But it is more appropriate to say that this moral feeling is Canada’s new excuse, and the Liberals—always the triangulating centrists of Canadian politics—have simply perfected a political repackaging of an existing narrative. He adds:

But the transformation underway among the Liberal Party, government institutions, and the broader establishment was less a sea change than a shape-shift. Faced with an Indigenous uprising unlike anything in Canadian history, they were prepared to accept, and even help construct, a new public consensus—making a taboo of overt racism, cleansing our public squares of ugly tokens from our past, embracing the resurgence in Indigenous cultural expression, and adopting the language of Indigenous liberation. But, within this consensus, there were several great unmentionables: land, resources, power, and the sharing of any of it. Such a consensus would serve to contain and silence the transformative potential of Indigenous rights—held over vast territories, posing barriers to reckless extraction, and grounded in a vision of a different relationship to each other and the natural world.

This is why Jody Wilson-Raybould’s conscientious objection was so disconcerting to Canadian Liberals: insofar as she served as a stand-in for genuine understanding of Indigenous lives, it left many uneasy to see such a visible symbol of our purported reconciliation defenestrated by Trudeau, proof that the elevation of an Indigenous woman to one of the highest offices in the land was never about empowering her to begin with. For the Liberals, the only acceptable response to her spurning was to attack, gleeful at the early signs that she would lose her election standing as an Independent candidate. That she ultimately won should be a signal to Ottawa that Canadians saw courage in her position against the status quo. Trudeau’s treatment of Wilson-Raybould is a metonym for Trudeau’s treatment of the MMIWG: a cosmetic allyship meeting the cold, hard pavement.

Reconciliation (as conducted by the settler) becomes thought of and fought for in the battleground of the imagination.

Few Canadian politicians have fought the co-option of Indigenous reconciliation by the politics of self-preservation. Trudeau is simply the latest in a long lineage selling a combination of self-flagellation and self-care. The apology for residential schools for instance—finally issued by the previous Prime Minister Stephen Harper—was largely done out of legal obligation to an agreement struck by hispredecessor Prime Minister Paul Martin, who himself was attempting to stave off a major lawsuit being brought by Indigenous survivors. In Martin Lukacs’s latest book, The Trudeau Formula: Seduction and Betrayal in an Age of Discontent, he counts the recent appeal of the Human Rights Tribunal compensation order as at least the eighth timethe Liberals have fought judicial rulings in support of Indigenous reparations.

The fight against reparations exists on various fronts, however. After all, the courts are only one method of redress, and political demands are just as important as legal demands. The Inquiry includes 231 “calls for justice” directed at industries, institutions, media, health-care providers, educators, police, Correctional Service Canada and child welfare workers. In spite of Trudeau’s promises, it is unlikely these will be implemented in their totality or even partially, with a big tent party like the Liberals needing to balance various other political considerations. But imagine for a moment what it might it look like for reconciliation to instead transcendgovernance. Justice Murray Sinclair, who Chaired the TRC, wrote of “a systematic and concerted attempt to extinguish the spirit of Aboriginal peoples.” In this way, genocide is a crime against the soul of Indigenous life, situating its unimaginable world-destroying pain outside the Canadian political structure and hinting at a deeper, collective, almost spiritual obligation that remains owed.

In a cynical sense, this would suggest that Trudeau is, in fact, exactly the man the moment requires: the political figure most able to acknowledge the dimensions of genocide as mourning metaphor and wily enough to limit the dimensions of genocide as legal crime.

It is unsurprising that Indigenous peoples feel condescended to. After the Attawapiskat First Nation declared a state of emergency in July over its poisoned tap water, Indigenous singer Adrian Sutherland wrote a song called “Politician Man.” In it, he croons, “I get tired sometimes, I can’t take no more. You take half my heart and you still want more. . . . Lyin’ to my face, lyin’ to yourself, lyin’ to the people that you said you would help.”

And then he adds, “Hey Mister politician man, whatchu done for me lately?”

1.2949s , 10029.1328125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【?? ?? ??? ??】Enter to watch online.Mister Politician Man,  

Sitemap

Top 亚洲免费片中文字幕 | madoutv在线观看 | 亚洲国产成人资源在线桃色 | 激情男女高潮射精AV免费 | 大陆一级真人片免费高清 | 电视在线国产成人av一区二 | 六月色香婷婷一区二区三区 | 精品人妻综合久久 | 青青草国产三级精品三级 | 日本一区二区视频在线观看 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品综合网 | 国产成人精品一区二区视频 | 国产精品无码刺激性 | 99久久伊人精品综合观看 | 日韩精品欧美激情亚洲综合 | 99国产精品无码专区 | 国产精品成人免费综合 | 日韩国产成人 | 中文字幕免费精品小视频 | 91久久精品国产一区 | 久久国产加勒比精品 | 欧美激情视频一区二区免费 | 日韩精品人妻系列无码av一道 | 免费在线看污网站 | 欧美日韩综合在线视频免费看 | A欧美爰片久久毛片A片 | 囯产亚州中文字幕美日韩在线 | 国产玖玖在线观看 | a级毛片无码av | 精品久久久国产成人一区二区三区综合区精品久久久中文 | 无码日韩少妇爆乳 | 日本高清色片 | 国产欧美日韩电影免费在线观看中文字幕 | 亚洲一区二区三区在线免费观看 | 欧美丝袜秘书在线一区 | 精品线一区二区三区免费看 | 中日黄色录像一级片免费播放 | 2024国产乱伦在线播放 | 狂野欧美性猛交xxxx免费 | 亚洲精品视频在线播放 | 自拍一区在线 | 久久三级国产 | 无码精品人妻一区二区三区老牛 | 日本少妇按摩做爰2 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品专区52 | 欧美重口另类在线播放二区 | 天天躁人人躁人人躁狂躁 | 久久久久无码精品国产无码一区精品中文字幕久久久久久a | 无码纯肉视频在线观看 | 欧美日韩制服中文视频在线 | 国产一区二区精品高清在线观看 | 2024国产精品午夜 | 国产欧美日韩在线视频重口味 | 国产情侣一区二区三区 | 国产精品无码av天天爽播放 | 久久久久精品国产三级 | 色欲AV久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区二区三区秋霞秋理 | 久久精品伊人无码二区 | 2024国产麻豆剧传媒网站 | 亚洲欧美色一区二区三区 | 久久免费视频6 | 久久久久久久久无码精品亚洲日 | 国产成人精品一区二区三区免费 | 在线日韩日本国产亚洲 | 欧美黄黄黄AAA片片 欧美黄片一区二区视频 | 国产成人无码aa片免费看 | 国产999精品成人网站 | 亚洲欧美中日韩中文字幕 | 在线精品国自产拍 | 无码专区人妻系列专区 | 国产毛片午夜无码专区喷水 | 精品国产91乱码一区二区三区亚洲系列中文字幕 | 国产精品原创尤物菠萝蜜 | 国产精品va在线观看视色 | 成人做爰A片免费视频日本 成人做爰A片三免费视频 | 日本一道高清一区二区三区 | 欧美高潮乱码电影日本理伦片午夜 | 国产精品视频第一区二区三区 | 高清精品国内视频 | 久久精品青春五月天综合网 | 极品少妇粉嫩小泬啪啪AV | 精品无码日本蜜桃麻豆走秀 | 在线无码一区二区三区不卡 | 国产a一级毛片爽爽影院 | 亚洲无av码一区二区三区 | 超爽无码一二三区中文字幕 | 久久亚洲av无码精品色麻豆夜 | 狠狠色丁香久久综合婷婷 | 宅男噜免费看网站 | 日本无码一区二区二区 | 女人高潮特级毛片 | 无码人妻精品一区二区三区免费看 | 狠狠色丁香婷婷综合欧美 | 一区二区三区国模大胆 | 97久久久无码国产精品 | 国产乱子伦视频一区二区三区 | 成人欧美一区二区三区视频不卡 | 91久久国产热精品免费 | 国产成人无码aⅴ片在线图 国产成人无码aa精品一区 | 波多野结衣xfplay在线观看 | 精品乱码8久久久久久日本 精品乱码久久久久久日本麻豆 | 国产综合色精品一区二区三区 | 免费aa毛片| 精品日产一卡2卡三卡4卡 | 美女脱18以下禁止看免费 | 国产成人高清激情视频在线观看 | 国产精品久久午夜夜伦鲁鲁 | 乱色熟女综合一区二区 | 日本无码人妻精品一区二区视频 | 国产精品久久毛片A片杨颖 国产精品久久免费视频 | 麻豆文化传媒WWW网站入口 | 国产日韩久久三级精品综合 | 亚洲国产精品午夜福利在线观看 | a级毛片无码兔费真人久久91 | 免费无码又爽又刺激A片软 免费无码又爽又刺激A片软软件 | 天美麻花星空视频mv | 久久久久高潮无码精品 | 丁香五月婷开心亚洲按摩电影99 | 麻豆一区二区蜜桃成熟时 | 午夜精品久久久内射近拍高清 | 在线观看免费人成视频色9 在线观看免费色六月婷婷激情综合 | 亚洲欧洲卡1卡2卡新区2024八 | 高清免费在线观看 | 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕一区二区三区 | 久久综合亚洲一区二区三区色 | av无码一区二区二三区1区6区 | 欧美色图一区二区三区 | 琪琪色原网20岁以下热热色原网站 | a片一区二区三区 | 99久久精品国产综合 | 在线观看亚洲精品国产福利片 | 午夜亚洲av永久无码精品 | 国产高清无码不卡在线观看 | 欧美综合区自拍亚洲综合天堂 | 亚洲av永久综合在线观看另类 | av无码一区二区三区鸳鸯影院 | 含紧一点H边做边走动免费视频 | 日韩免费视频 | 国产无码免费在线观看网站 | 欧美在线一区二区 | 99精品免视看 | 精品人妻无码视频中文字幕一 | 国产午夜精品无码网站 | 久久国产精品久久小说 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久乱码 | 成人综合亚洲日本一区二区 | 成人妇女免费播放久 | 国产亚洲精品第一综合另类 | 中文字幕乱码人妻无码久久激情 | 国产精品视频第一区二区三区 | 久久久久久青草大香综合精品 | 成年女人免费视 | 国产高清无码精品久久久 | 一区二区三区国模大胆 | 欧洲丰满少妇做爰视频爽爽 | 色综合小说网 | 天堂av无码av一区二区三区 | 苍井空在线费观看 | 丁香五月激情中文字幕 | 亚洲日韩av无码不卡一区二区三区 | 久久国产免费观看精品1 | 国产91精品福利在线观看 | 久久久国产一区二区三区丝袜 | 中文字幕A片视频一区二区 中文字幕va一区二区三区 | 日韩精品视频一区二区三区 | 精品日韩一区欧美二区 | a级真人片免费高清真人片视频 | 亚洲在线天天更新国产又粗又大又黄 | 男女摸下面刺激免费视频软件 | 国产麻豆视频免费在线观看 | 久久久久无码国产精品一级 | 色婷婷五月综合亚洲小说 | 国产精品美女久久久久v福 国产精品美女久久久久久 国产精品美女久久久久久不卡 | 亚洲VA天堂VA欧美片A在线 | 国产精品亚洲一区二区无码 | 国产在线精品一区二区在线观看 | 精品无码国产自产在线观看极品 | 国产69久久精品成人看高清免费观看 | 麻豆精品入口麻豆 | 国产美女一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲欧美自拍制服另类 | 国产91色综合九九高清在线观看 | 中国国产免费一级片 | 国产人妻人伦精品 | 一区二区三区无码被窝影院 | 国产精品另类激情久久久免费 | 人妻精品一区二区免费 | 国产精品无码人妻在线 | 中文字幕AV在线一二三区 | 亚洲欧美另类日本人人澡 | 2024免费人妻在线视频 | 欧美日韩一区精品一区 | 国产精品无码播放 | 国产午夜在线观看视频播放 | 欧美日韩精品系列一区二区三区 | 一本久道久久综合多人 | 日本a区精品 | 人妻系列中文字幕亚洲 | 精品久久一区二区 | 99热国产这里只有精品无国产亚洲 | 韩国理伦片在线观看影片 | 高清性色生活片免费播放网 | 久久久久久久精品免费看a片资源 | 精品一区二区三区四区在线观看 | 欧美黑人粗大猛烈18p | 蜜桃 美利坚保护 日本WWW高清 | 乱色熟女综合一区二区三区国产人成亚洲综合无码aⅴ蜜桃 | 欧美精品日韩精品一区二区 | 日本成人 | 丁香五月天婷婷缴情五月 | 中国产xxxxa片免费视频aqq | 国产一卡2卡3卡4卡网站精品 | 成人YY视频在线观看 | 人妻丰满熟妇V无码区A片免费看 | 国产高清无码黄片亚洲成人毛片 | 男女久久久国产一区二区三区 | 色妺妺在线视频喷水 | 久久影院毛片一区二区 | 成人久久18免费软件 | 中文一国产一无码一日韩 | 久久伊人精品影院一本到综合 | 国产香蕉在线观看 | 五月天精品视频在线观看 | 无码国产精成人午夜视频一区二区 | 人妻无码久久中文字幕专区 | 99久久久国产精品消防器材 | 亚洲午夜精品AV无码少妇 | v无码久久久久久不卡网站 v无码中文字幕 | 亚洲欧美国产国产综合一区 | 久久久国产精品亚洲一区 | 东京热无码一区二区 | 免费久久久久 | 蜜桃日本免费MV免费播放 | 黄色成人 | 精品人妻系列无码人妻免费视频 | 你懂的网址免费国产 | 蜜臀AV色欲无码A片一区 | 亚洲精品福利一区二区在线观看 | 久久久久久久一线毛片 | 午夜精品一区二区三区三上悠亚 | 18禁裸体无遮挡无码网站 | 久久久久精品国产四虎2024 | 欧美成人h版整片合集 | 国产jizzjizz免费看jizz | 国产亚洲欧美另类专区 | 国产成人免费ā片在 | 亚洲国产私拍精品模在线 | 女同一区二区在线 | 日本高清 | 婷婷色人阁| 亚洲综合国产成人丁香五月激情 | 亚洲日本在线免费观看 | 欧洲久久久精品 | 韩国精品无码久久一区二区三区 | 白莲花乖腿打开h调教 | 国产亚洲精品自在线亚洲情侣 | 国产亚洲精品97在线观看 | 国产精品特级毛片一区二区三区 | 欧美一级a片视频免费播放久久 | 91亚洲精品福利在线播放 | 国产精品视频久久视频小视频香蕉视频 | 国产女同女互慰 | 国产成人午夜在线视频极速观看 | 国产伦久视频免费观看视频 | 国产综合精品中文字幕免费 | 五月天国产成人av免费观看 | 无码免费一区二区三区日本A片 | 免费国产又色又爽又黄的网站 | 亚洲av无码成h人动漫无广告 | 久久久久人妻一道无码av | 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字幕伊人 | 娇小娇小与黑人tubevideos | 亚洲av无码专区在线观看素人 | 国产中文亚洲日韩欧美 | 日本女人毛茸茸 | 成人专区一区 | 国产黄毛片 | 国产福利一区二区三区在线观看1794 | 亚洲欧美综合在线精品 | 99久久国产精品国产毛片 | 国产成人久久精品流白浆 | 亚洲精品白浆高清久久久久久 | 国产精品亚洲产品一区二区三区 | 暴露放荡的娇妻 | 欧洲美女粗暴牲交视频免费 | 精品丝袜国产自在线拍免费看 | 国产精品亚洲日韩欧美色窝窝色 | 亚洲精品天堂在线观看 | 色情无码视频无码小说 | 国产亚洲日韩精品欧美一区二区 | 麻豆国产极品系列视频 | 国产又爽又猛又粗的视频A片 | a国产精品一区第二页 | 一边吃胸边膜下免费版刺激 | 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交视频 | 国产亚洲精品精华液好用吗 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区九九九 | 91国偷自产中文字幕婷婷 | 久久久久久久久久久福利 | 91三级在线 | 青青草伊人亚洲一区二区三区 | 日韩欧美丝袜一区二区 | 丰满人爽人妻A片二区 | 国产成人久久精品二三区麻豆玄幻 | 丰满日韩放荡少妇无码视频 | 精品国产久一区二区三区 | 国产伦子沙发午休 | 精品国产自产在线观看一区 | 国产一级特黄aa毛片 | 五月丁香综合激情六月久久 | 国产精品成人av片免费看地址 | 久久人妻精品国产 | 精品无码国产一区二区三区麻豆 | 久久亚洲精品无码A片大香大香 | 国产免费午夜高清 | 日本高清www午色夜com | 国产三级片一级在线观看 | 2024年亚洲午夜一区二区福利 | 2024精品国产无码 | 国产重口老太和小伙乱 | 久久九九久精品国产综合一千收藏 | 国产乱伦精品一品二品 | 中文字幕在线观看你懂的 | 91精品综合久久久久五月天 | 91精品久久人人妻人人做 | 国产精品人妻久久久999 | 欧美人最猛性XXXXX | 国产精品反差婊在线观看 | 亚洲成人成综合在线播放 | 一本之道中文字幕久久美香 | 无码免费一区二区三区免费播放 | 亚洲精品久久无码AV片软件 | 丁香婷婷综合久久精品 | 国产视频无码在线观看 | 久久久国产亚洲精品无码 | 国产欧美日韩在线在线播放 | 国产网红情景剧在线观看 | 中文字幕一区2区 | 国产av巨作饥渴性店长 | 久久久老熟女一区二区三区 | 国产精品无码一区二区三 | 顶级欧美熟妇高潮xxxx | 欧美日韩激情视频一区二区 | 动漫精品一区二区无码 | 国产av无码国产av毛片 | 又黄又爽又色的少妇毛片 | 国产亚洲欧美在线人成aaaa | 高清人妻夜夜躁狠狠躁日日躁 | 天堂av无码大芭蕉伊人 | 91麻豆国产福利在线观看 | 二区无码国产97人妻人人做人碰人人爽 | 天美传媒影视 | 91最新精品视频在线 | 国产乱子伦手机在线 | 在线精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 国产丝袜肉丝视频在线 | www.亚永久免费 | 国产欧美另类第一页 | 国产乱子伦精品 | 凹凸精品熟女在线观看 | 久久无码人妻一区二区三区 | 久久久久久精品影院 | 亚洲综合国产精品第一页 | 人妻av中文系 | 97人视频国产在线观看 | 无码少妇一区二区三区芒果 | 久久久久久一级毛片免费野外黑人 | 伊人网综合在线视频 | 麻豆视频免费 | 东京热人妻无码人a | 久久精品亚洲中文字幕无码网站 | 无码精品日本一区二区桃花岛 | 精品动漫一区 | 91精品国产亚洲爽啪在线观看 | 成人精品一区二区三区中文字幕 | 久久精品国产久精国产 | 国产日韩欧美另类制服 | 无码夜色一区二区三区 | 国产精品乱人无码av在线a | 91丝袜在线| 欧洲特黄三级A A AA AA | 亚洲国产精品色情20242024 | 久久久久久久综合狠狠综合 | 91精品国产麻豆国产自 | 99久久免费精品国产 | 国产爽快片一区二区三区 | 国产97人人网 | 亚洲国产最新在线一区二区 | 国产成人无码一二三区视频 | 久久精品国产亚洲AV波多 | 成人午夜精品网站在线观看 | 国产精品亚洲一区二区麻豆 | 国产人伦视频在线观看 | 99香蕉国产线观看免费 | 无码一区二区视频 | 五月天堂婷婷爱 五月丁香天堂网 | 久久99国产精品成人 | 91精品国产乱码久久蜜臀 | 18观看免费永久视频 | 国产欧美日韩在线中文一区 | 蝌蚪久热精品视频在线观看 | 亚洲综合另类小说色六月 | 日本巨乳亚洲高清 | 日本高清网| 国产精品久久久久久99人妻精品 | 亚洲另类性爱视频 | 国产高清一区二区视频在线 | 成人乱码一区二区三区AV0 | 中文有无人妻vs无码人妻激烈 | 欧美日韩精品 | 亚洲无人区码一二三码区别图片 | 亚洲成人国产 | 成人区人妻精品一区二欧美毛片 | 欧美巨大精品欧美一区二区 | 欧美丝袜秘书在线一区 | 国产亚洲人成无码网在线观看 | freesex性欧美顶级少妇 | 精品国产av无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧美国产日产综合不卡 | 日韩精品人妻无码中文字幕啪啪 | 国产精品不卡一区二区三区在线观看免费在线观看高清完 | 国产91一区二区在线播放 | 精品1卡二卡3卡4卡免费 | 国产熟妇的荡欲午夜视频 | 亚洲一区二区三区在线免费观看 | 2024无码专区人妻系列日韩 | 亚洲无码精品日韩 | 日本黄色x | 国产欧美日产中文一区 | 一个色| 国产男女猛烈无遮挡A片小说 | 丁香五月婷婷最嫩 | 免费无码又黄又爽又刺激 | 国产欧美日韩视频免费 | 青草视频com永久的网站 | 丁香婷婷综合激情五月色 | 粗大的内捧猛烈进出 | 亚洲国产精品人人做人人爽 | 久久无码人妻中文字幕免费 | 精品视频一区二区三三区四区 | 亚洲欧美日韩综合久久久久 | 成人毛片18女人毛片免费视频未 | 日韩成人黄片免费看 | 国产成人精品一区二区三区视频 | 噜噜噜噜私人影院av线观看 | 日韩好片一区二区在线看 | jizz亚洲日本 | av免费网址国产精品 | 久久九九九九日韩玖玖玖 | 日本熟妇乱妇熟色在线电影 | 亚洲av永久无码精品无码漫画 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久 | 国产美女av在线 | 丁香综合缴情六月 | 国产av午夜精品一区九区 | 亚洲日韩精品无码专区网址 | 国产一区二区免费在 | 成人精品免费播放 | 国产91精品女同一区二区 | 精品人妻少妇嫩草a | 国产高清在线精品一本大道 | 国产成人福利院免费观看 | 国产91精品久久久久久久 | 国产综合色精品一区二区三区 | 伊人五月在线 | 日本喷潮| 91精品国产免费久久久久久婷婷 | wbg国产乱码卡一卡二卡三新区又有新动作 | 家庭教师波多野吉衣 | 国产三级手机在线 | 亚洲 日韩 另类 天天更新 | 色播六月 | 亚洲综合色无码 | 亚洲日本中文字幕天堂网 | 国产成人亚洲精品无码青草 | 午夜精品一区二区毛片 | 丁香婷婷综合网 | 国产精品久久久精品视频 | 天天精品夜夜精品视频 | 午夜国产视频 | 欧美刺激午夜性久久久久久久 | 欧洲久久| 2024久久伊人精品中文字幕有 | 素人约啪第五季 | 伊人影院 永久入口 | 久久久无码精品成人A片小说 | 欧美精品视 | 久久青草国产免费观看 | 国产女人18毛片水真多1 | 精品成在人线av无码免费看 | 无码高潮少妇毛多水多水免费 | 国产一区二区美女自卫 | 欧美孕妇乳喷奶水在线观看 | 久久久无码精品亚洲 | 久久精品亚洲精品一区 | 性一乱一交A片 | 91精品久久久无码中文字幕69 | 国产成人AV综合久久不卡 | a级毛片免费高清 | 精品美女国产互换人妻 | 国产 欧美 日韩 综合网 | 欧美特级午夜一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久尹人综合网亚洲 | 久久久久久精品影院妓女 | 日本高清视频网站www | 亚洲啪啪综合?v一区综合精品区 | 伦理亚洲 | 欧美人与动牲交a免费 | 狠狠综合欧美综合欧美色 | 波多野42部无码喷潮在线 | 岛国大片在线播放高清 | 成人色爱在线中文 | 亚洲欧美日韩在线观看一 | 亚洲av高清在线观看一区二区 | 偷拍福利一区二区每日更新 | 久久久久久无码精品亚洲日韩 | 青青草在现线观看免费 | 亚洲欧美色图小说 | 欧美一级日韩一级亚洲一级 | 丁香六月深婷婷激情五月 | 成人亚洲性情网站www在线观看 | 日韩欧国产精品一区综合无码 | 麻豆一区产品精品麻豆蜜桃 | 日本一道本视频 | 伊人影视在线观看日韩区 | 中文字幕αⅴ无码免费 | 国产精品一区二区三区毛片 | 国产欧美日韩精品高清二区综合区 | 亚洲综合丁香婷婷六月香 | 国产麻豆出品 | 韩国精品一区 | 大桥久未无码吹潮在线观看 | 国产亚洲欧美在线中文bt天堂 | 精品偷拍一区二区三区在线看 | 久久综合综合久久97色 | 久久激情免费视频 | 国产乱伦在线视频 | 国产三级电影在线观看 | 国产AA久久大片日本无码 | 国产精品毛片a | 中文字幕高清免费日韩视频在线 | 国产精品第一页国产亚洲精品国产福利国产精品自拍国产 | 国产成人剧情aⅴ毛片 | 精品人妻少妇二区三区 | 国产日韩a视频在线播放视频 | 国产免费一区二区三区香蕉精 | 九九九精品午夜在线观看 | 日本12不卡视频 | 国产精品一码二码三码在线 | 四虎影视1 | 国产精品AV国片偷人妻麻豆 | 毛片一区二区在线看 | 国产欧美日韩综合精品 | 真实国产乱子露脸 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品一区二区 | 国产91精彩视频 | 亚洲AV永久无码精品网址 | 成人免费又大又爽A片视频 成人免费在线观看视频 | 欧美日韩不卡中文字幕在线 | 少妇无码一区二区三区免费 | 1区1区3区4区产品乱码芒果 | 国产精品国产三级国产在线观看 | 亚洲国产韩国一区二区 | 亚洲一区三区激情啪啪欧美 | 成年女人免费观看播放视频 | 韩国男人的天堂 | 国产欧美另类 | 在线精品国自产拍 | 日本妇人成熟a片高潮 | 韩国和日本免费不卡在线 | 91久久国产综合精品女同国语 | 欧美天堂影视 | 国产高清在线精品 | 国内精品久久久久伊人av | 92国产精品午夜免费福利视频 | 欧美 国产 综合 欧美 视频 | 国产69精品久久久久久人妻精品 | 色婷婷综合激情视频免费看 | 777爽死你无码免费看一二区 | 国产精品爽爽久久久久久 | 精品无人区乱码1区2区3区免费 | 国产精品三级片在线观看 | 国产激情无码一区二区在线看 | 亚洲欧美精品 | 国产精品原创av在线播放 | 日本中文字幕在线视频一区 | 精品深夜av无码一区二区老年 | 国产三级精品三级在线观看专1 | 精品国产丝袜黑色高跟鞋 | 精品91精品91精品国产片 | 手机看片福利久久伊人 | 91大神亚洲影视在线 | 99久久免费国产精品热 | 久久久久亚洲视频 | WWW亚洲精品久久久 WWW亚洲精品久久久乳 | 国产精品一级 | 无码人妻精品一区二区三区夜夜嗨 | 国产a级毛片无码 | 四房播播最新地址 | 欧美日韩国产综合欧美 | 日产在线播放视频在线观看 | 成人特黄午a一级毛片 | 啪啪日韩 | 国产一级免费视频 | 国产成人精品福利色多多 | 日韩人妻少妇一区二区 | 一级做a爰片性色毛片16美国 | 成熟女人毛片www免费版在线 | 欧美日韩国产码高清综合人成 | 乱子真实露脸刺激对白 | hd无码乱码无码亚洲精品无码不卡 | 18处破外女出血在线 | 国产午夜福利视频一区二区32页 | 久久久无码精品成人A片 | 亚洲欧美色图小说 | 国产日韩精品视频 | 欧美亚洲国产成人一区二区三区 | 久久精品亚洲一区二区 | 国产精品亚洲av三区 | 少妇护士放荡激情嗯啊小说 | 久久伊人加勒比一区二区 | 成人国产第一区在线观看 | 自慰网大全在线观看 | 精品国产片自在线拍免费看 | 国产av剧情md精品麻豆 | 日本高清一级婬片a级中文字幕 | 91国内免费久久久久久久久久 | 经典a级片 | 久久精品国产亚洲一区二区三区 | 超清中文乱码精品字幕 | 久久国产精品亚洲大片 | 18国产丰满xxx毛片成人内射国产免 | 亚洲精品久久久久久AV伊人 | 国产成人高清精品一区二区三区 | 国产精华一线二线三线区别在哪 | 国产一区日韩二区欧美三区 | 国产久久久国产精品成人 | 国产精品成熟老女人 | 国产激情一区二区三区成人 | 国产亚洲欧美另类一区在线观看 | 色噜噜狠狠色综合日日 | 日本韩国欧美一区 | 中文字幕你懂的 | 国产无人区一卡2卡三卡4卡仙 | 国产另类欧美自拍日韩综合 | 亚州一区二区三区三级片 | 四虎在线精品观看免费 | 亚洲丰满熟女一区二区三区 | 亚洲日本va中文字幕婷婷 | 色综合久久加勒比高清麻 | 中文线码中文高清播放中 | 久久精品久久香蕉国产色戒 | 无码孕妇孕交在线观看 | 国产欧美日韩综合一区 | 青青草原综合久久大伊人精品 | 亚洲精品无码成人A片在线古代 | 99久久精品日本一区二区免费网站直播老师欧美综合熟妇99 | 精品无码一区二区三区 | 成网站在线观看人免费 | 国产老司机精品视频在线观看 | 婷婷开心深爱五月天播播 | 欧美日韩免费高清视频一区二区 | 久久久国产精品资源 | 亚洲精品无AMM毛片 亚洲精品无播放器在线观 亚洲精品无码 | 久久久久无码精品国产av蜜桃 | 久久久久无码国产精品一区 | 亚洲欧洲国产精品久久 | 女自慰喷水免费观看www久久 | 综合久久一区二区三区 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久郑州公司 | 久久九九精品国产综合喷水 | 国产欧美一区二区三区涩涩 | 成人精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲欧美日韩高清av | 欧美乱妇 | 久久棈精品久久久久久 | 亚洲精品免费视频 | 色婷婷激婷婷深爱五月小说 | 色欲AV久久综合人妻无码 | 精品国产卡一卡2卡3卡 | 人妻不敢呻吟被中出A片视频 | 男女性高爱麻豆 | 1区2区3区4区产品不卡码网站 | 欧洲 亚洲 国产图片综合 | 久久视频在线视频观看: | 精品一卡2卡三卡4卡 | 一区二区不卡视频 | 动漫av纯肉无码av电影网 | 国产成人精品电影午夜 | 99热久| 成人国产欧美大片一区 | H狠狠躁死你H视频A片 | jizz全部免费播放在线观看日韩中字在线观看 | 色综合久久超碰色婷婷 | 欧美激情一区二区三区视频高清 | 2024偷拍大学生情侣无套进入 | 大战丰满无码人妻50p | 欧美黑人乱大交灬太大了视频 | 日韩成人高清二区三区 | 欧美人妻一区黄A片 | 欧美亚洲每日更新在线日韩 | 亚洲AV久久婷婷蜜臀无码不卡 | 九一果冻传媒制片入口 | 国产91福利福区三区 | 国产在线一区二区 | 国产a级黄色毛片 | 国产三级91 | 日韩免费看 | 精品国产一区二区三区不卡蜜臂 | 99热久久精品国产一区二区 | 熟女人妻一区二区三区视频 | 97国产精品视频观看一 | 日本AAAA级毛卡片免费观看 | 欧美人与动牲交免费看 | 51久久久中文精品不卡影院 | 麻豆最新免费版 | 熟女精品视频一区二区 | 91麻豆国产福利在线观看 | 亚洲国产精品第一区二区三区 | 性色a∨人人爽网站hd | 秋霞无码久久一区二区 | 日韩欧美国产一区精品 | 精东天美麻豆果冻传媒性巴克:人气高的可截屏姐妹直播 | 人妻无码不卡在线视频免费 | 国产人妻久久精品二区三区老狼 | 91精品国产高清片久久久久久 | 亚洲国产一线二线三线 | 成人色站在线视频看片 | 久久久久亚洲va无码专区首 | 一区二区三区91 | 欧美变态另类xxxx | 黄网站免费在线 | av毛片久久久久午夜福利hd | 亚洲日韩欧美制服精品二区 | 成人动漫精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 免费观看久久精品视频 | 五月丁香啪啪. | 精品乱子伦一区二区三区 | 一级一毛片a级毛片 | 欧洲最新一卡二卡三卡四卡 | 成人国产在线播放一区二区 | 91免费看 日韩一区二区 | 国产午夜一级在线观看影院 | 成人免费无码h在线观看不卡 | 欧美天天在线 | 国产福利电影一区二区 | 亚洲国产精品综合久久网各 | 国产成人18黄网站免费网站 | 久久波多野结衣 | 欧美巨大精品欧美一区二区 | 久久久久精品国产亚洲v | 亚洲国产美国国产综合一区二区 | 日本三线免费视频观看 | av无码中文字幕不卡一区二区三区 | 99久久精品无码一区二区三区 | 老熟女一区二区免费视频 | 国产日韩精品中文字无码国产精品 | 无码日韩精品一区二区人妻 | 国产午夜精品一区二区不卡 | 丁香六月激情 | 免费人妻无码 | 国产丰满熟女91 | 亚洲欧美色国产综合 | 精品福利一区二区三区 | 91麻豆精品无码一区二区三区 | 成人a毛片在线看免费全部播放 | 精华国产一二三区区别 | 欧美日韩国产综合在线高清视频 | AV一区AV久久AV无码 | 国产成人精品免费视频大全麻豆 | 99久久国产露脸精品麻豆 | 久久中文字幕综合不卡一二区 | 久久九九久精品国产免费直播 | 亚洲国产av午夜福利精品一区 | 久久久久99精品成人片试看 | 2024亚洲综合色情久久 | 日韩精品无码一区二区三区视频 | av在线亚洲男人的天堂 | 国产毛片精品一区二区色欲黄A片 | 国内精品久久久久久网站 | 精品人伦一区二区三区蜜桃小说 | 国产色欲av精品一区二区 | 日韩欧美亚洲每日更新在线 | 欧美日韩亚洲综合另类ac | 久久久亚洲精品一区二区三区 | 成人精品一区二区三区日本久久9 | 国产91精选在线观看麻豆 | 国产目拍亚洲精品一区 | 麻豆果冻传媒新剧国产杜鹃 | 自拍视频一区二区国产精品合集一区二区 | 精品露脸国产偷人在视频 | 国产色无码精品视频国产 | 国产不卡视频在线观看 | 黄色视频在线播放免费不卡 | 激情视频亚洲日本 | 91嫩草国产在线无码观看 | 国产麻豆三级 | 人妻少妇精品 |