Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

精品东京热,精品动漫无码,精品动漫一区,精品动漫一区二区,精品动漫一区二区三区,精品二三四区,精品福利导航,精品福利導航。

【inflating pregnant belly sex video】Enter to watch online.AMD FSR 4 is Very Impressive: 1440p Upscaling Tested

AMD really needs FSR 4 to be inflating pregnant belly sex videogreat. Throughout the last two GPU generations, gamers have been abandoning Radeon for GeForce, and a key contributing factor to this is DLSS. Nvidia has continued to improve DLSS upscaling year over year, culminating in their latest release with DLSS 4 which is even better than before.

Meanwhile, AMD has been slipping further behind, especially for gaming at popular resolutions like 1440p, as their FSR 2.2 and FSR 3.1 upscalers just haven't been competitive enough. In most games, Nvidia has been delivering a much higher quality visual experience with upscaling enabled, and Radeon sales have suffered as a result.

Why test at 1440p? Because it is a more common resolution than 4K, and previous versions of FSR struggled at 1440p. To be a truly viable option for gamers, AMD needs to deliver high-quality results at this resolution. It is far more important than 4K – if they get 1440p right, they will almost certainly get 4K right as well.

But that could all change with FSR 4. AMD is finally releasing an upscaler for gamers that's built around an AI model, promising significant improvements to visual quality. Previous versions of FSR used more traditional algorithms, which allowed for broad GPU support, but the quality suffered in comparison to DLSS.

With FSR 4 using AI – AMD says it's a hybrid of a CNN and Transformer model – it's much more likely to be competitive with DLSS. But where exactly does FSR 4 fall? Can it match DLSS 3? Beat DLSS 3? Match DLSS 4? That's what we will be exploring in detail throughout this article and the accompanying video footage.

To assess FSR 4 image quality, we will be analyzing 14 different aspects of upscaling, including texture quality, edge stability, ghosting, disocclusion, foliage, particles, water, and more. The goal is to compare FSR 4 to DLSS, so we are carrying over many of our tests from recent DLSS 4 evaluations. However, FSR 4 game support differs slightly from DLSS, so there are some new titles included, though the areas of focus remain the same.

How Does FSR 4 Work?

Unlike previous FSR versions that were designed to be broadly compatible, FSR 4 only works on RDNA 4 graphics cards like the Radeon RX 9070 XT. This is because it uses FP8 processing, which isn't accelerated on previous RDNA GPUs. As a result, FSR 4 cannot be used on RDNA 3 or older GPUs, and likely never will be, even though AMD has left the door open for potential support.

Accessing FSR 4 is very similar to Nvidia's latest implementation of DLSS 4. Some games have native integrations – simply enable FSR 4 in the game, and you're good to go. For other titles, you can upgrade them from FSR 3.1 to FSR 4 using AMD's driver, similar to Nvidia's DLSS override feature.

However, there are a couple of important things to note. First, a game must have implemented at least FSR 3.1 to be upgrade-compatible, as that was the first release to use a DLL. Games using older versions of FSR, like 2.2 or 3.0, cannot be upgraded, which is disappointing since those versions make up the majority of FSR-supported titles. Second, AMD uses a game whitelist similar to Nvidia, so only approved FSR 3.1 titles have the FSR 4 upgrade toggle.

At present, most FSR 4-supported games are getting FSR 4 via the driver upgrade toggle rather than native game integration. However, during the review period, some FSR 3.1 titles were not supported, such as Stalker 2 and Indiana Jones and the Great Circle. Presumably, those titles will need to be whitelisted, making future driver updates crucial.

We are kicking off the analysis of FSR 4 with a look at 1440p. Why 1440p? Because it is a more common resolution than 4K, and previous versions of FSR struggled at 1440p. To be a truly viable option for gamers, AMD needs to deliver high-quality results at this resolution. It is far more important than 4K – if they get 1440p right, they will almost certainly get 4K right as well. This is a stress test, and we are holding nothing back.

All FSR 4 examples were captured at 1440p using the Radeon RX 9070 XT, while all other examples were captured using the GeForce RTX 5090. A selection of games was used, with settings such as motion blur, grain, vignette, and chromatic aberration disabled.

Sharpness was set to 0 for upscaling unless otherwise specified. All DLSS 3 examples were upgraded to DLSS 3.8.10, except for Hunt: Showdown, which remains on DLSS 3.7 as it cannot be upgraded. All DLSS 4 examples utilize the latest model via Nvidia's driver override.

Let's get into it.

FSR 3 vs FSR 4

FSR 4 is a significant improvement over FSR 3.1 in almost every way. FSR 4 is much less blurry in motion and far more stable. In areas with fine detail, FSR 4 is a night-and-day difference in reducing sizzling and grain, particularly in elements like hair and grass.

For a while, we thought we might have to censor FSR 3.1 images because YouTube doesn't allow offensive content on the platform, but after checking the guidelines, we think it's okay – even if it has the potential to scorch your eyeballs. Just cover your eyes if it gets too ugly.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

The difference is so massive and so obvious while gaming that it barely seems like these two technologies belong to the same family or even deserve the same name. This is almost like the leap from DLSS 1 to DLSS 2.

This improvement is evident in every example using the Quality mode. If we switch to the Performance mode, it's actually surprising that AMD allowed people to use the FSR 3.1 Performance mode at 1440p because it produces terrible image quality – really, really awful.

FSR 4 is actually somewhat usable at 1440p in Performance mode. Yes, there are some issues in motion, but not the kind that blur and sizzle the entire screen. The difference is so significant that it's hard to describe – if the FSR 4 Performance mode represents true 1440p, then the FSR 3.1 image in comparison is, what, like 360p at best?

We were blown away by some of these comparisons because we weren't expecting FSR 4 to improve this much in Performance mode at 1440p. FSR 3.1 was so far behind DLSS in this configuration that we expected an improvement but still anticipated some level of disappointment. Gone are the days of FSR being completely useless at upscaling from a low render resolution.

Now, the real testfor FSR 4 is how it compares to DLSS 3 and DLSS 4. Beating FSR 3.1 is nice, but that bar was relatively low.

The real challenge is competing with the industry leader in upscaling, so for the rest of this article, we will primarily compare FSR 4 with DLSS. How do these technologies compare in terms of blur and texture quality?

Textures and Blur

FSR 4 holds up really well in this regard. Previously, we found that DLSS 4 had practically eliminated TAA blur in motion, even down to the Performance mode at 1440p. This meant that texture quality was enhanced and the overall image appeared sharper relative to DLSS 3 and even native rendering. The same applies when comparing FSR 4 to DLSS 3 using the same modes – in this case, Quality vs. Quality.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

In this Spider-Man 2 example, we are rapidly switching between a still shot while stationary and a still shot captured mid-motion. The DLSS 4 version preserves almost the same level of detail and sharpness whether stationary or in motion. DLSS 3 appears quite blurry in motion compared to the stationary image. FSR 4 sits somewhere between the two, with significantly better clarity in motion than DLSS 3, but not quite reaching the level of DLSS 4.

This trend was observed in other games we tested, though results varied depending on the title and scene. For example, in Hunt: Showdown, FSR 4 was much closer to DLSS 3 than DLSS 4 in terms of clarity. However, in The Last of Us Part I, the reverse was true, and FSR 4 was much closer to DLSS 4. In all of these examples, in-game sharpness was set to 0, ensuring no additional sharpening was applied after the upscale pass.

It also doesn't seem like FSR 4 is simply sharpening a blurry image; rather, it appears to be handling fine texture details in motion more effectively. There are some aspects of the DLSS 3 image that cannot be sharpened to match the clarity of FSR 4, which generally gives AMD's upscaler the edge. This is great news since image crispness is a major selling point for DLSS 4, and in many cases, FSR 4 is competitive in this aspect.

The performance of these upscalers across various quality settings remains relatively consistent. This means that the clarity of the Quality mode and the clarity of the Performance mode follow similar trends.

In some instances, DLSS 4's Performance mode is sharper and better than FSR 4's Quality mode, though this doesn't necessarily hold true for other aspects of image quality. There are also situations where distinguishing which upscaler provides better clarity requires zooming in, which is a great result for FSR 4. In most cases, we preferred its sharpness over DLSS 3.

Edge Stability

Next up is edge stability. You might have noticed in some of the previous shots that FSR 4 can struggle with maintaining stable edges in motion, particularly with characters. However, this issue was primarily observed in the two Insomniac games we used for testing – Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart and Marvel's Spider-Man 2 – both of which use the same game engine.

For some reason, in these specific games, FSR 4 is more prone to aliased character edges compared to DLSS 4 and DLSS 3, which can look unappealing in certain scenes.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

However, when switching to similar third-person titles like Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered and The Last of Us Part I, this aliased edge issue was not present, and the stability of character edges in motion appeared fine. It's unclear why this happens, but in a worst-case scenario, FSR 4 does not preserve edge stability in motion as well as DLSS 3.

Outside of these cases, FSR 4 delivers mixed results. While it represents a huge step forward compared to FSR 3, in the best examples, it only matches DLSS 3 in stability – while DLSS 4 remains far ahead in preserving stable edges and details between frames.

For example, in Ratchet & Clank, both FSR 4 and DLSS 3 performed similarly in maintaining stair edges as the player approached them. A similar trend was observed in Spider-Man 2. In Hunt: Showdown, aliasing and shimmering levels were comparable when looking at FSR 4 Quality versus DLSS 3 Quality, with DLSS 4 clearly superior in this regard.

In other situations, FSR 4 is not as stable as DLSS 3 when comparing the same quality settings. For instance, in The Last of Us Part I, FSR 4 struggled in slow pan shots, creating instabilities on bricks and window edges – artifacts that were absent in the DLSS 3 image and could be somewhat distracting.

Strangely, in The Last of Us Part I, FSR 4 Balanced mode actually outperformed DLSS 3 Balanced in some cases, with little difference in stability between the two FSR 4 modes. At times, FSR 4 Balanced even appeared more stable than FSR 4 Quality, which is unexpected. FSR 4 winning in a Balanced vs. Balanced comparison was quite common, meaning that at worst, FSR 4 is only half or even less than half a quality tier behind DLSS 3.

The challenge AMD faces is that DLSS 4 Performance mode is often more stable than DLSS 3 Quality mode, which means DLSS 4 Performance also surpasses FSR 4 Quality. It's possible that AMD prioritized reducing blur over improving stability, as FSR 4 is generally the sharper but less stable image compared to DLSS 3. Meanwhile, DLSS 4 delivers the best of both worlds. This is one of the biggest areas AMD needs to focus on when improving future versions of FSR 4.

Ghosting

When it comes to ghosting, all upscalers are prone to it in the worst cases. Fortunately, across most of the examples we analyzed, FSR 4 is not particularly susceptible to ghosting and does not introduce ghosting in areas where DLSS does not.

Most of the time, performance is comparable, so for example, when examining particle effects in Ratchet & Clank, both DLSS 3 and FSR 4 exhibit minor ghosting, just at different times. However, DLSS 4 is relatively more resilient in this scenario.

There's another example from Spider-Man 2, where each algorithm is triggered by slightly different conditions, but no technique is completely immune. Unfortunately, we couldn't put FSR 4 through the Forza Motorsport test since FSR 4 is not supported in that title. However, in the games we did test, FSR 4 is unlikely to cause significant ghosting issues.

Disocclusion

A major win for FSR 4 comes in the area of disocclusion. Among the three main techniques examined here, FSR 4 generally provides the best image quality, or at the very least, matches DLSS 3, which was previously the leader.

As we found in the DLSS 4 analysis, DLSS 4 prioritizes a sharper image, often resulting in worse disocclusion than DLSS 3, leading to more sizzling around characters in third-person games. In titles such as The Last of Us Part I, this trend holds when comparing DLSS 4 to FSR 4 – AMD's technology comes out ahead with fewer noticeable artifacts at the same Quality mode.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

It is harder to distinguish differences in games like Horizon Zero Dawn, but upon closer inspection, there is slightly less fizz around Aloy when running in the FSR 4 images compared to DLSS 3, and especially DLSS 4.

In Hunt: Showdown, the DLSS 4 image appears slightly smeared around the gun in motion, while FSR 4 remains relatively clean with only a few disocclusion artifacts, with DLSS 3 performing similarly to FSR 4.

In many situations, disocclusion artifacts in DLSS 4 are not particularly noticeable, as they typically disappear within a few frames, making them difficult to detect during real-time gameplay. However, the most impressive aspect here is that AMD has gone from having the worst disocclusion handling, with frequent sizzling around characters, to essentially having the best implementation at 1440p.

Hair

Hair quality is very similar across all three upscalers. When comparing images in Quality mode, we did not find many substantial differences in motion, even in challenging scenarios such as Aloy's hair billowing as she runs.

The detail, stability, and clarity of the hair are virtually identical between FSR 4 and DLSS, meaning the ugly grain seen constantly with FSR 3 is no longer an issue. This element is now being upscaled effectively.

This applies across various games, including fur rendering in Ratchet & Clank. The only major difference is that the edge of the fur appears aliased using FSR 4. However, this issue seems to be related to the aliasing problems observed in Insomniac games, as discussed earlier.

This type of artifact is not present in a title like The Last of Us Part I. Speaking of The Last of Us, it was reassuring to see decent beard stability, as well as slightly improved hair rendering in one specific example when comparing FSR 4 to DLSS.

It is also not a case where DLSS outperforms FSR at lower quality settings. When lowering DLSS to Balanced while keeping FSR 4 in Quality mode, FSR typically appeared slightly better in this comparison. This represents a strong result for AMD's upscaler in this area.

Particles

Particle quality presents mixed results. When observing confetti in Ratchet & Clank, there is a significant difference in how FSR 4 renders it compared to DLSS 3 and 4. With FSR 4, the confetti appears much sharper and clearer, but this also exposes more aliasing on the edges, which is less noticeable in the softer DLSS presentation.

As a result, the confetti can flicker slightly in an unzoomed image, whereas DLSS 4, in particular, produces a much smoother output. However, FSR 4 demonstrates noticeably less ghosting in this area compared to DLSS 3, making it the superior option in some respects. That said, overall, DLSS 4 looks the best, with FSR 4 Quality only really being comparable to DLSS 4 Performance.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

The results were different in The Last of Us Part I when examining dense spore clouds. Here, FSR 4 looked particularly strong, especially in comparison to DLSS 3, which suffered significantly from ghosting. Compared to DLSS 4, FSR 4 actually reconstructed more spore particles, though DLSS 4 handled minor ghosting and shimmering more effectively.

Based on these examples, FSR 4 particle quality should generally be superior to DLSS 3 in most scenarios and potentially approach DLSS 4 levels.

Transparency

We were very impressed with the quality of transparencies in FSR 4. This was a major weakness in FSR 3 and 2.2, where transparencies appeared garbled and looked terrible.

With FSR 4, transparencies are much clearer, more stable in motion, and have better detail, eliminating the poor quality seen in previous versions. In fact, FSR 4 is on par with DLSS 3 and 4, with DLSS 4 perhaps having a slight edge.

Not only are transparencies well-handled while standing still – something that was often an issue with FSR 3 – but fire also benefits significantly from superior reconstruction. Grainy, pixelated fire is much less common in FSR 4, resulting in image quality similar to DLSS.

In Ratchet & Clank, the rotating hologram is clearer and resolves detail better, though DLSS 4 is slightly less aliased for some of the fine lines. The transparent logo on top of the store character now looks like any other element in the game.

This also improves scenarios where characters or objects become transparent as the player moves through the game world. For example, in Spider-Man 2, when turning the camera close to a wall, Spidey briefly becomes transparent. This transparency looks very similar between DLSS and FSR 4, with DLSS 4 exhibiting slightly better edge quality, but FSR 4 still performing well.

Comparing this to FSR 3 highlights just how much of an improvement has been made, even in Balanced mode. This is a huge win for games featuring many transparent objects that require upscaling.

Fine Details

When it comes to fine detail reconstruction, FSR 4 generally does not perform as well as DLSS 3. While the two technologies can appear similar when stationary, in motion, DLSS 3 is typically more stable and better at preserving detail in fine wires and lines on distant objects.

This is especially noticeable in scenes from The Last of Us Part I, where at 1440p, FSR 4 is the least stable presentation among the options tested, while DLSS 4 is significantly more stable.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

This issue is most apparent on very fine pixel or near-pixel level wires, where FSR 4 can become aliased in motion relative to DLSS. While the DLSS 3 image is slightly blurrier, it maintains better stability. However, FSR 4 is not far behind, and in examples like Hunt: Showdown, both DLSS 3 and FSR 4 exhibit similar stability issues for fine elements.

DLSS 4 is clearly the best option for fine detail stability, meaning a lower DLSS 4 mode can often match or surpass FSR 4. In fact, there were cases where the Performance mode in DLSS 4 appeared superior to FSR 4 in Quality mode. This aligns with earlier findings on general edge stability – FSR 4 is not quite at the same level when rendering at 1440p, and this remains one of its primary weaknesses.

Trees

Tree quality is another area where FSR 4 delivers mixed results. The simplest way to describe its performance relative to DLSS 3 is that it is sharper but less stable. This creates a trade-off – depending on individual preference, some may favor the sharper FSR 4 image, while others may prefer the smoother DLSS presentation.

Several factors, such as motion speed and tree density, influence these results. For instance, in The Last of Us Part I and Horizon Zero Dawn, where a single tree is set against a relatively clean background, FSR 4's stability issues are less apparent, while its clarity advantages are more noticeable.

However, in scenes where trees overlap, FSR 4 struggles more compared to DLSS 3, as the blurrier DLSS image helps mask potential instabilities. DLSS 4 offers the best of both worlds, often delivering similar or better clarity than FSR 4, with enhanced leaf detail and improved stability.

That said, DLSS 3 does not always outperform FSR 4. In this Hunt: Showdown example, DLSS 3 maintains better stability for fine tree branch details, but the foliage itself is more stable in the FSR 4 image.

Additionally, as the quality modes are lowered, FSR 4 gains ground relative to DLSS 3. In Balanced mode, the two techniques appear similar, while in Performance mode, FSR 4 has the edge. It is only in the highest quality setting that DLSS 3 holds a noticeable advantage.

Overall, tree artifacts in FSR 4 are not particularly distracting, unlike in FSR 3, where trees often sizzled in motion and looked terrible. With FSR 4, there is a good chance that at 1440p, these artifacts will go unnoticed, making them less of a concern compared to other stability issues discussed earlier.

Grass

Grass quality in FSR 4 is very impressive, especially considering this was a major weakness in previous versions of FSR. Gone are the days of grass appearing extremely grainy and ugly in motion. At 1440p using the Quality mode, FSR 4 renders grass with detail, general stability in motion, and no grain or sizzling issues. In games like Horizon Zero Dawn, it looks fantastic, surpassing DLSS 3 in clarity and motion stability, and almost reaching the level of DLSS 4.

Other titles also showed favorable results for FSR 4, such as The Last of Us Part I. While trees can be slightly less stable in FSR 4 compared to DLSS 3, the opposite is true for grass quality, which is generally better in FSR 4. DLSS 4 holds the edge in overall stability, but FSR 4 remains highly usable. In fact, the largest gap between FSR 4 and DLSS 3, favoring FSR, was observed when viewing the very thin strands of grass in Hunt: Showdown. In this case, DLSS 3 Quality mode exhibited some graininess, while FSR 4 looked fantastic by comparison.

FSR 4 did struggle with the unusual purple grass and shrubs in Ratchet & Clank, which were less stable in the FSR 4 image compared to DLSS 3. However, in most other examples, FSR 4 delivered excellent grass quality, often matching either DLSS 4 Quality or Balanced modes.

Fences

Fence quality is another area with mixed results. For fences with thicker details and repeating patterns, FSR 4 generally delivers image quality at or slightly above DLSS 3 levels. It is much less likely to introduce ugly pattern artifacts compared to FSR 3, though it still does not reach the level of stability or artifact-free rendering seen in DLSS 4. The fact that FSR 4 offers a similar or better experience than DLSS 3 is a strong result.

For mesh-style fences with thinner details, FSR 4 struggles more. In this Spider-Man 2 example, there is noticeable sizzling and aliasing in the FSR 4 image compared to DLSS 3 in Quality mode, particularly when multiple meshes overlap.

While DLSS 3 can appear slightly soft when upscaling these details, it produces less shimmering than FSR 4, with DLSS 4 clearly performing best. However, in some cases, such as this example in Hunt: Showdown, FSR 4 holds up relatively well against DLSS 4.

A particularly strange finding was that in some fence scenarios, FSR 4 Balanced mode appeared more stable than FSR 4 Quality mode at 1440p, such as in the Spider-Man 2 overlapping meshes example.

After triple-checking, we consistently found the Balanced mode to provide better visual stability. If instability becomes an issue, it may be worth experimenting with Balanced mode instead of Quality mode.

Cloth

Cloth quality in FSR 4 is generally strong when applied to character clothing and flags flying in the wind. The differences between FSR 4 and DLSS are minimal, making this a solid result for third-person games, particularly those featuring characters with capes.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

Regarding moiré effects, there is another odd situation. In a comparison of FSR 4 Quality versus DLSS 3 Quality, FSR 4 is more prone to displaying moiré artifacts, as seen in this Ratchet & Clank example. However, when comparing FSR 4 Balanced mode to DLSS 3 Quality mode, the Balanced mode actually reduces moiré artifacts compared to Quality at 1440p.

While it is still not as good as DLSS 3, the improvement is noticeable despite the lower render resolution. AMD may need to refine the Quality mode further, as there should be no situations where it performs worse than Balanced mode, yet we have already encountered several such cases.

Water

Water quality is very similar across all three technologies. Previously, FSR 3 had significant issues with aliasing on the surface of water, particularly in fast-moving streams with ripples. With FSR 4, surface quality is now comparable to DLSS 3, and in the worst cases, it is only slightly behind DLSS 4. This should no longer be a major concern when using FSR upscaling.

Rain

We were pleased to see that rain quality has been significantly improved in FSR 4. In our punishing snow test – and we are reliably informed that snow is just a magical form of rain – FSR 4 closely matches DLSS in overall quality.

Previously, with FSR 3, rain effects appeared as a blurry, smeared mess, but now FSR 4 provides a much clearer and more usable image, even when comparing Performance mode across upscalers.

In fact, FSR 4 appears slightly better than DLSS 3 in some cases. Snow particles are less blurry, and background disocclusion is handled with less grain, putting FSR 4 very close to DLSS 4 in terms of overall quality.

Performance Benchmarks

Next, we analyze performance. The benchmarking process is straightforward: we tested the Radeon RX 9070 XT using FSR 3 and FSR 4, and the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti using DLSS 3 and DLSS 4.

These cards are closely matched in overall performance, allowing for a direct comparison of the performance uplift provided by FSR relative to native rendering and DLSS relative to native rendering. Since the baseline performance of each GPU is similar, these results should be quite comparable.

We start with Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart at max settings. As observed previously, DLSS 4 runs slightly slower than DLSS 3 in this title, and we see a similar trend with FSR 4 versus FSR 3. However, the overall performance uplift from each upscaler is very similar. FSR 4 on the 9070 XT provided a 31% increase in frame rate compared to native rendering using Quality mode, while DLSS 4 on the 5070 Ti also delivered a 31% improvement. Balanced mode results were closely matched, while FSR 4 had a slight advantage in Performance mode.

In The Last of Us Part I, we recorded a 22% performance improvement using FSR 4 Quality mode compared to native TAA at 1440p on the 9070 XT. On the 5070 Ti, we observed a 24% improvement, which is very similar. At each quality level, DLSS 4 provided a slightly higher performance uplift, but the difference was minimal.

Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered already runs well on these GPUs at 1440p, so upscaling has a smaller impact. DLSS 4 provided a 16% uplift in Quality mode and a 24% uplift in Performance mode. FSR 4 showed a 14% improvement in Quality mode and a 29% improvement in Performance mode.

Results in Spider-Man 2 were similar. Here, DLSS 4 was 24% faster in Quality mode compared to native, 29% faster in Balanced mode, and 34% faster in Performance mode. FSR 4 was 22% faster in Quality mode, 26% faster in Balanced mode, and 31% faster in Performance mode. While slightly slower than DLSS, the difference was not substantial.

Looking at the geometric mean across this four-game sample, FSR 4 and DLSS 4 provide nearly identical performance boosts at 1440p on similar class hardware.

Only a few percentage points separate the two technologies. In general, we see a little over a 20% boost in Quality mode and around a 30% boost in Balanced mode. Of course, upscaling has a greater impact when the base frame rate is lower, but in these games, native rendering was typically around 100 FPS or higher, reducing the overall impact of upscaling on performance.

What We Learned

When assessing all aspects of FSR 4 upscaling at 1440p, we believe the technology comes out looking quite strong. This represents a massive step forward for AMD's upscaler at this resolution. The differences between FSR 3 and FSR 4 are enormous, providing owners of new Radeon RDNA 4 graphics cards with a significantly improved experience in supported titles.

FSR 3 was mostly unusable at 1440p and not very competitive with DLSS 3, let alone DLSS 4. It suffered from severe artifacts in motion, excessive grain and sizzling, significant blur, and an inability to handle low render resolutions. The signature "fizzled" look of FSR 3 at 1440p has been eliminated in FSR 4, making the technology not just usable, but genuinely effective without major compromises to image quality. This clears the first hurdle FSR 4 needed to overcome: it is not just barely usable but actually performs well.

What's most impressive is that FSR 4 image quality generally falls somewhere between DLSS 3 and DLSS 4. Since many gamers consider DLSS 3 good enough for 1440p gaming, matching or even exceeding that level of quality is a significant win for FSR 4. In most cases, FSR 4 should meet the expectations for image quality, delivering a pleasant experience. This has substantially narrowed the upscaling gap between AMD and Nvidia at 1440p.

What's most impressive is that FSR 4 image quality generally falls somewhere between DLSS 3 and DLSS 4.

FSR 4's biggest advantage over DLSS 3 lies in texture quality and blur reduction. AMD has effectively eliminated TAA blur, something DLSS 3 does not fully achieve. In direct comparisons, this is the most noticeable improvement – FSR 4 is simply less blurry. Additionally, FSR 4 delivers enhancements in disocclusion, grass quality, particles, and rain, often appearing less grainy than DLSS 3 in motion.

That's not to say FSR 4 is not universally superior though. Its biggest weakness is stability, which affects elements like edges, fine details, trees, and fences in motion. In the best cases, FSR 4 can be slightly more stable than DLSS 3 at 1440p, but there are many situations where DLSS 3 holds the advantage.

This creates a trade-off: FSR 4 offers better clarity but reduced stability. AMD needs to refine this area, particularly in cases where FSR 4 Balanced mode is more stable than FSR 4 Quality mode – this inconsistency needs to be addressed. Fixing this issue could further close the gap to DLSS 3. Even in instances where FSR 4 is less stable, it remains usable and is not far behind.

As we mentioned just a minute ago, overall FSR 4 image quality sits between DLSS 3 and DLSS 4, meaning DLSS 4 is still the best option for 1440p gaming. DLSS 4 essentially combines the best aspects of DLSS 3 and FSR 4: it is as clear and blur-free as FSR 4, if not clearer, while also maintaining excellent stability.

In certain situations, FSR 4 comes close to DLSS 4 – such as with transparencies, rain, and hair – but overall, DLSS 4 retains an edge in image quality. The only clear advantage FSR 4 has over DLSS 4 is in disocclusion.

This puts AMD in an interesting position. While DLSS 4 is better and delivers the highest image quality for 1440p gamers, is it worth choosing an Nvidia GPU solely for access to DLSS 4 instead of FSR 4? If this were a comparison between DLSS 4 and FSR 3, or even DLSS 3 and FSR 3, the answer would be a definitive yes – buying a GeForce GPU instead of a Radeon, even at a premium, would be justified.

But now that FSR 4 is highly usable and effective in most scenarios, the decision becomes less clear. If two hypothetical GPUs offer the same performance at the same price – one with DLSS 4 and one with FSR 4 – the GeForce GPU would still be the preferred choice due to DLSS 4's superior upscaling. However, if the Radeon GPU is cheaper, the decision becomes more difficult.

Would it be worth paying 10% more for DLSS 4? 15%? 20%? Previously, a 20% premium for DLSS was justifiable, but now that FSR 4 has significantly improved, that margin seems less reasonable. Right now, we would be satisfied playing games with FSR 4 at 1440p, but would also be willing to pay a small premium for DLSS 4. Beyond a certain price difference, however, it becomes harder to justify spending more on a GeForce GPU unless it offers additional compelling features beyond upscaling.

The next big problem for AMD, the spanner in the works, is game support. The decision to pay extra for DLSS 4 is contingent on games also supporting FSR 4. If that's not the case, if we're instead talking about DLSS 4 versus FSR 3 or FSR 2.2, then that value comparison goes out the window, making a GeForce GPU the obvious choice. In that situation, paying a 20% premium for a GeForce GPU – or even more – becomes justifiable.

The reality is right now Nvidia GPUs offer an acceptable level of upscaling in far more games than Radeon GPUs due to stronger DLSS support. While this may improve as more developers integrate FSR 4, AMD remains far behind Nvidia in game support.

This is largely because Nvidia laid the groundwork years ago with DLSS, which uses a DLL that can easily be upgraded to DLSS 4 via first-party or third-party tools. As a result, most modern titles offer, at minimum, DLSS 2 or DLSS 3, with many now supporting DLSS 4. In contrast, while some games can be upgraded to FSR 4 – and it is great to see a reasonable selection of titles at launch – many remain stuck with FSR 2.2, which significantly impacts real-world game support in Nvidia's favor.

Looking ahead, we hope to see the gap in game support and image quality continue to close. FSR 4 provides a solid foundation for this progress, but AMD still has work to do. The company needs to convince developers to update existing games to FSR 4, including major titles like Cyberpunk 2077, while ensuring future titles include FSR 4 support at launch. At the same time, AMD must continue refining its AI upscaling algorithm to improve image quality in edge cases.

Until that happens, AMD remains in an early adoption phase with FSR 4. Yes, the upscaling gap has narrowed, but it may not be closed in the games you want to play. So you'll need to factor that in to your value calculations when tossing up between GeForce and Radeon. If you strike gold with an FSR 4 game you'll be in for a pretty great experience, and we expect Radeon owners to benefit from increasing game support over the next few years.

Last but not least, based on our testing, our recommendation on quality settings at 1440p, we generally suggest using Quality mode. However, this varies by game. In most titles, Quality mode provides the best image quality, with noticeable compromises when lowering settings. However, in some games, Balanced mode can actually deliver a more stable image. If stability issues arise in Quality mode, switching to Balanced may improve the experience. Otherwise, Quality mode remains the preferred setting for most cases.

0.1469s , 14707.0859375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【inflating pregnant belly sex video】Enter to watch online.AMD FSR 4 is Very Impressive: 1440p Upscaling Tested,  

Sitemap

Top 精品国产一区二区三区久久久久久 | 国产成人理论片在线观看 | 国产成人亚洲综合第一精品 | 国产va免费视频一区二区三区 | 国精一二二产品无人区免费应用 | 亚洲精品第一永久地址911 | 亚洲欧美另类中文字 | 2024年最新偷拍视频一区 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久鸭王 | 丁香五月综合欧美 | 亚洲三级毛片在线 | 国产精品久久免费视频 | 国产不卡视频一区二区三区 | 在线播放五十路熟妇 | 久久爱色综合天天综合网 | 国产精品久久人妻互换毛片 | 欧美粗大特黄AAA片 欧美村妇激情内射 | 精品久久久久久亚洲精品 | 国产高潮流白浆免费观看不卡 | 麻花豆传媒剧国产MV在线 | 波多野结衣电影网 | 国产婷婷久久综合五月欲色扒 | 国产欧美日韩高清在线不卡 | 欧美+日本+国产+在线观看 | 女自慰喷水免费观看www | 久久久久久久久真人一级毛片一级黄色毛片91精品 | 麻豆视频网址 | 亚洲精品久久无码AV片俺去也 | 久99久精品免费视频热77 | 岛国在线观看一区二区三区 | 蜜臀av无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液 | 国产欧美久久久久久精品一区二区 | 制服丝袜人妻中文字幕在线 | 国产美女一级做a视频免费 国产美女一区二区 | 无码淫网站 | 成人国产精品高清视频免费 | 成人无码在线观看 | 国产肥熟女老太老妇A片 | 日韩精品无码一区二区三区视频 | 无码国产精成人午夜视频一区二区 | 波多野结衣乳喷高潮视频 | 国产精品啪啪一区二区三区 | h无码精品动漫在线观看 | 国产69一区二区三区在线观看 | 99好久被狂躁A片视频无码刻晴 | 欧美不卡高清一区二区三区 | 蜜桃日本免费观看MV | 国产a视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲Aⅴ无码专区在线观看q | 无码日本大胆XXXX | 蜜臀色欲av无码人妻 | 蜜桃国产成人精品区在线观看 | 97国产精品欧美一区二区三区 | 国产成人精品影视 | 国产亚洲欧美在线视须 | 国产成人在线观看网站 | 日韩国产三级 | 欧美在线| 精品免费国产一区二区三区四区 | 老司机精品视频一区二区 | 高清免费视频 | 久久五月天国产片 | 99久久久无码国产精品试看 | 国产精品爆乳在线播放第一人称 | 久久五月视频 | 国产一区二区三区在线看片 | 日本一区二区三区在线观看 | 免费乱人伦 | 蜜桃国产成人精品区在线观看 | 亚洲第一无码专区天堂 | 中文成人无字幕乱码精品区 | 日本黄色影片全裸体片一区二区三区 | 国产毛片片精品天天看视频 | 免费高清资源黄网站在线观看 | 精品人妻无码一区二区色欲aⅴ | 欧洲精品免费一区 | 卡一卡二卡三专区免费 | 色噜噜五月婷婷 | 网站无需付费在线看视频 | 亚洲AV成人影视在线观看 | 国产无套露脸 | 亚洲欧美成人二区 | a片无码一区二区三区在线 a片一区二区三区 | 国产乱人偷精品人妻A片 | 久久久久久久久国产精品无码 | 国产日韩麻豆电影一区二区 | 国产精品亚洲日韩AⅤ在线观看 | 国产日韩精品欧美一区色 | 久久久久噜噜噜亚洲熟女综合 | A片A三女人久久7777 | 成人精品一区二区三区电影免 | 波多野结衣美 | 国产精品日韩丝袜视频一区 | 国产麻豆精品乱码一 | 欧美性受xxxx黑人xyx性爽 | 久久无码无码久久综合综合 | 亚洲精品久久国产高清情趣 | 91天堂在线视 | 国产精品中文字幕亚洲欧美 | 中文字幕久久精 | 成人无遮挡裸免费视 | 极品人妻被黑人中出 | 欧美成人a在线一区二区 | 漂亮的年轻的继坶3在线 | 亚洲国产99精品国自产 | 欧美村妇激情内射 | 黄A无码片内射无码视频 | 国产精品爽爽久久久久久 | 自拍日韩图片专区 | 美女裸体黄网站18禁免费看影站 | 99久久婷婷国产综合亚洲 | 日本aⅴ精品一区二区三区日 | 精品三级久久久久电影 | 国产成人乱码一区二区三区在线 | 91国偷自产中文字幕 | 国产精品 中文字幕 亚洲 欧美 | 91精品无码久久久久 | 中文亚洲网站播放 | 亚洲高清无码免费观看视频射精 | 亚洲综合AV在线在线播放 | 麻豆国产精成人品观看免费 | 天天综合网精品视频7799 | 第四色精品在线一区 | 久久久久国产精品素人影院 | 国产精品久久影院 | 乱人妻人伦中文字幕 | 无码高潮少妇多水多毛 | 国产乱理伦片在 | 国产福利萌白酱精品tv一区 | 91精品日本久久久久久牛牛 | 人妻精品丰满熟妇区 | 99热久久久无码国产精品性麻豆 | 久久久久国产精品免费a片 久久久久国产精品免费s | 在线无码免费观看 | 久久久国产精品网站 | 激情又色又爽又黄的A片 | 2024国产麻豆剧传媒精品网站免费在线观看高清完整版 | 日韩中文永久免费观看电视剧 | 国产精品 制服中字 在线视频 | 成人欧美s视频 | 疯狂少妇2做爰中文字幕 | 日日干夜| 情网站色 | 国产一级a爱在线观看 | 国产欧美一区二区三区 | 日本无码在线观看综合 | 久久久久久久国产精品视频 | 五月丁香综合啪啪成人 | 理论片午夜成人影院 | 东京热无码AⅤ | 中文字幕视频在线免费观看 | 人妻师生制服丝袜另类 | 中文人妻无码一区二区三区在线 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区高清版 | 欧美视频在线免费观看 | 成人欧美一区二区三区视频 | 亚洲欧美激情图片 | 国产成人av在线免播放观看 | 亚洲尖叫无码精品一区二区三区 | 国产91精品青草社区视频网址 | 欧美激情一区二区亚洲 | 成人精品在线观看 | 国产精品免费不卡无码av | 国产精品露脸精彩对白 | 国产图片一区 | 日韩欧美精品在线视频一区 | 久久久国产亚洲精品无码 | 四房色播手机版 | 97国语精品自产拍在线观看 | AV天堂影音先锋AV色资源网站 | 欧美性猛交xxxx黑人 | 成人网站在线观看色久窝 | 在线观看视频一区 | 日本免费一区二区三区最新 | 国产成人久久精品二三区 | 欧美另类杂交a | 婷婷色香五月激情综合2020 | 亚洲成a人片在线观看中 | 亚洲精品爆乳无码a片成田梨纱 | 色老板亚洲视频在线观 | 日韩手机在线免费视频 | 海角国精产品三区二区三区 | 美国一级毛片片aa久久综合 | 午夜av无码a在线观 午夜av无码福利免费看网站 | 精品久久久久中文第一幕 | 亚洲制服丝袜av一区二区三区 | 无码国产一区二区三区四区 | 久久AV亚洲精品一区无码 | 岛国精品一区免费视频在线 | 苍井空一区二区波多野结衣 | 国产精品高清视亚洲一区二区 | 欧美又大又硬又长又粗A片 欧美又大又长又粗又爽A片 | 被少妇滋润了一夜爽爽爽小说 | 国产乡下三级全黄三级 | av岛国天堂网 | 91精品国产综合久久婷婷 | 国产精品三级在线观看 | 精品成人乱色一区二区 | 日本黄色一区 | 亚洲精品一区久久久久一品AV | 电影图片精品少妇一区二区三区a片 | 9I国产视频| 色一性一乱一伦一一区二区三区 | 无码丰满熟妇一区二区 | 爱啪网亚洲第一福利网站 | 亚洲欧洲日产国码韩国 | 欧美丰满少妇久久无码精品 | 欧洲丰满大乳人妻无码欧美 | 久久无码人妻一二区 | 精品国产麻豆 | 宝贝舒服吗好紧好多水小说 | 国产乱子伦农村叉叉叉日本免费一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧美韩国综合色 | 日韩欧美极品 | 大东北熟女啪啪嗷嗷叫 | 成人精品一区二区三区中文字幕 | 99久热只有精品视频免费看 | 开心色播网网址 | 强奸乱伦欧美激情一区二区 | 欧美日韩一区二区综合在线视频 | 久久久久亚洲av成人网人人软件 | 精品人妻人人做人人爽 | 少妇大荫蒂毛多毛大 | 99视频免费播播 | 国产欧美精选激情视频 | 无遮挡BBBBB级A片 | 加勒比系中文字幕无码 | 波多野结衣中文字幕在线播放 | 亚洲理论片在线观 | 欧美一区二区三区四区在线观看 | 国产中文字幕在线 | a级国产乱午夜理论片在线观看 | 久久久久亚洲精品无码网址蜜桃 | 日韩av无码免费播放 | 国产www在线播放 | 精品人妻va人妻中文字幕 | 91无码高清视频在线播放 | 亚洲第一卡二新区乱码 | 精品无码无人网站免费 | 久久99精品久久久久子伦 | 片福利一区二区三区 | 久久精品伊人一 | 熟女天天高潮喷水一区二区 | 国产成人av乱码免费观看 | 久久精品午夜一区二区福利 | 韩国精品一区二区无码视频 | 精品大臿蕉视频在线观看 | mv日韩mv欧美mv | 国产韩国精品一区二区三区 | 黄AV国产永久免费网站 | 波多野结衣电影一区二区 | 久久九九日本韩国精品 | 亚洲AV国产爽歪歪无码 | 亚洲国产精品久久精品成人 | 六月丁香激情 | 色婷婷激婷婷深爱五月小说 | 欧美一级日韩一级亚洲一级 | 久久久91人妻无码精品蜜桃hdgv欧美男男亚洲 | 精品人妻无码一区二区三区绿 | 国产精品亚洲视频在线观看 | 人人精品日日夜夜精品3D | 人妻洗澡被强伦姧完整国产 | 久久AV无码乱码A片无码波多 | 欧美日韩另类精品一区二区三区 | 色一情一乱一乱一区99AV | 久久国产欧美另类久久久 | 成人精品一卡二卡三卡 | 国产91精品一区二区麻豆观看 | 影音先锋av网站你懂得 | 无遮挡粉嫩小泬久久久久 | 免费无码av | 人妻av中文系 | 3d肉蒲团快播种子 | 国产欧美日韩精品第三区 | 国产美女流白浆的免费视 | 国产卡1卡2卡三卡 | 制服师生av在线 | 9191精品国产免费久久电影 | 色婷婷亚洲婷婷7月 | 一级视频免费观看 | 色综合天天娱乐综合网 | 国产精品人妻无码久久网站 | 亚洲精品美女偷拍一区二 | 欧美精品久久99人妻无码 | 夜夜草高清 | 久久五月天桃花 | 亚洲 小说 欧美 另类 社区 | 俺也来俺也去俺也射 | 亚洲一区二区三区四区五区六区 | 人妻无码AV中文系统久久免费 | 久久97精品久久久久久清纯 | 麻豆日产精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡追逐那份独一无二的驾驭乐趣 | 久久国产成人精品麻豆 | 成人国产一区 | 在线观看的av免费网站 | 香蕉乱码 | 不卡无码人妻一区三区音频欧美老师午夜漫画 | 波多野结衣在线播放一区二区三区 | 波多野结衣一区二区三区四区欧美剧高清在线观看 | 一区二区三区四区在线免费观看 | 日韩无码人妻系列 | 国产激情对白一区二区三区四 | 国产成人久久av免费高清 | av无码国产综合专区 | 免费成人视频 | 久久久久无码一区人妻 | 国产亚洲精品久久久一区 | 中文字幕精品黄网站 | 国产免费一级在线观看 | 2024年精品产品免费 | 国产高清精品国语特黄A片 国产高清精品线久久 | 国产成人无码精品久久久最新a片 | 亚洲日本免费 | 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠狠色综合久久 | 无码国产精品一区二区免费久久 | 四虎最新在线永久免费 | 国产乱伦精品一区二区三区久久 | 亚洲欧美丝袜精品久久 | 91精品导航在线网址免费 | 国产另类欧美自拍日韩综合 | 91精品日韩av麻豆特色 | 精品偷自拍另类在线观看 | 精品无码专区在线播放 | 日本 一二三 不卡 免费 | 国产欧美动漫日韩在线一区二区三区 | 日本3级网站| 成人做爰视频网站 | 2017能在线观看的网站 | 久久国产成人亚洲精品影院老金 | 麻豆高清免费国产一区 | 91精品无码视频在线视频 | 97在线视频人妻无码男人三区免费在线播放天堂 | 激情黄网 | 国产清纯91天堂在线观看 | 高潮是mamamama的韩文歌 | 国产成人三级一区二区在线观看一 | 超高清真人大片视频 伊人网黄色视频 | 国产精品大尺度尺度视频 | 91久久久亚洲综合久久88 | 丝袜自慰一区二区三区 | 欧美激情无码成人A片 | 国产精品女人呻吟在线观看 | 国产精品白浆无码流出在线 | 日本生活片69视频 | 日韩国际精品一区二区 | 亚洲精彩视频在线观看 | 国产99久久精品区一区二 | 无码日韩精品一区二区免费 | 538亚洲欧美国产日韩在线精品 | 女人一级毛片免费观看 | 国产制服日韩丝袜86页雏田 | 精品成av人片天堂无码 | 2024亚洲va在线va天堂va国产 | 影音先锋av看片资源库 | 久久亚洲精品玖玖玖玖 | 欧美xx网站 一区二区三区精品在线 | 国产不卡视频一区二区三区四区 | 制服丝袜中文字幕国内自拍 | 成人黄色免费 | av鲁丝国产无码在线观看 | 欧美刺激午夜性久久久久久久 | 成人免费A片视频在线观看网站 | 中文字幕久久精品波多野结 | 久久久亚洲熟妇熟女ⅹxxx直播 | 国产999视频在线播放 | 日本又色又爽又黄的A片视频免费 | 国产成人精品福利色多多 | 日韩精品视频美在线精品视频 | 久久久九色综合亚洲成色777 | 成人综合网址 | 久久久久精品无码观看不卡 | 高潮喷水视频 | 国产午夜精品一区二区三区极品 | 口工绅士里番中文全彩 | 国产丝在线播放 | 男女羞羞下面好湿视频 | 久久精品久久久久久综合 | 国产真实谜奸在线观看 | 久久久久国产精品素人影院 | 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区三区 | 97国产成人无码精品久久久 | 久久久久免费看网站 | 国产目拍亚洲精品一区二区 | 国产av无码专区亚洲awww | 一级欧美一级日韩 | 国产91亚洲国模持一区 | 国产专区自拍 | 亚洲av无码专区在线观看成人 | 欧美亚洲综合免费精品 | 国产成人高清亚洲一区91 | 一本道本月无码 | 亚洲爆乳大丰满无码专区 | 91久久精品在这里色伊人 | 国产又大又粗又硬的A片 | 中文字幕久久精 | 亚洲欧美高清无码专区 | 大香伊人蕉在线观 | 精品国产三级a在线欧美 | 国产91久久九九免费精品无码 | 91精品孕妇系列 | 久久精品女人天堂av免费观看 | 日本vpswindows美国 | 四虎成人精品永久免费av | 69国产亚洲男人 | 国产精品无码不卡动漫在线播 | 少妇被粗大的猛烈的进出69影院 | 亚洲欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 99久久久国产精品免费 | 99久久婷婷国产综合精品青草 | 久久精品无码专区免费 | 国产三级农村妇在线直 | 久久男人av资源网站无码免费 | 东京热亚洲精品中文一区 | 国产日韩高清制服一区 | 日本午夜精品视频一区二区 | 被黑人强到高潮喷水A片 | 国产午夜精品视频免费不卡 | 麻豆人妻少妇精品无码专 | 91蜜桃精品国产91久久 | 免费免费啪视频观看视频 | 成人国内精品久久久久久 | 精品久久久久久影院免费 | 人妻制服丝袜有码中文字幕 | 亚洲色中文字幕无码av | 成人免费视频在线观看地区免下载 | 国产成人h片视频 | 2024人人干人人操 | 久久人妻熟女一区二区 | 国产中文字幕在线观看 | 91麻豆精品激情在线 | 日韩成人黄色 | 国产三级精品三级在线专区 | 国产av精品一区二区三区小说小说最新章节免费阅读 | 亚洲精品免费网站 | 欧美性爱极品另类视频播放 | 国产精品女同一区二区在线 | 亚洲一区二区三区成人 | 麻豆精品一区二区 | a级毛片毛片免费观看的久 a级毛片毛片免费观看久 | 中文字幕无码一久久区 | 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字幕伊人 | 强奷乱码在线观看三级 | 无码国产成人午夜 | 伊人无码高清 | 精品天天想夜夜摸无码 | 国产福利91精品一区无码 | 99精品国产综合久久久久五月天 | 一个人看的免费高清www视频 | 国产精品久久精品成人网站 | 一区二区视频在线观看 | 久久毛片视频 | 风流老熟女一区二区三区 | 欧美在线视频播放一区二区三区 | 国产91福利精品免费观看 | 亚洲午夜久久久久影院 | 天堂欧美| 一本道久久综合亚洲精品加 | 国产精品一区二区三区在线 | 丁香五月开心婷婷激情综合 | 波多野结衣av一区二区全免费观 | 欧美最猛黑人猛男无码视频 | 97精品人妻酒店综合大胆无码 | 2024天天射天天干天天爱 | a天堂v | 久久久久久亚洲aⅴ无码软件 | 精品人妻少妇嫩草av无码专区 | 国产三级片网站免费播放 | 成人无码在线观看电影 | 精品人妻中文字幕浪潮aⅴ 精品人妻中文字幕乱码 | 一区二区三区国产精品乱码 | 91中文 日韩 免费 精品 | 91精品第一国产综合精品 | 国产成人一级 | 在线播放最好看的国语电视剧在 | 久久久久久人妻一区二区三区 | 国产啪亚洲国产精品无码亚洲精华国产 | 国产亚洲欧美日韩综合综合二 | 国产乱子伦精品无码码专区 | 久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆导航 | 成年女人色毛片免费 | 加勒比精品性爱视频在线观看 | 国产素人在线观看人成视频 | 国产99久一区二区三区A片 | h在线观看网站网址 | 亚洲成av人片在线观看无 | 中文亚洲成a人片在线观看 中文亚洲乱码 | 精品无码国产欧美在线 | 九九精品久久 | 2024精品国夜夜天天柏 | av无码人妻一区二区三区牛牛 | 亚洲精品国产A久久久久久 亚洲精品国产不卡在线观看 | 亚洲乱码中文字幕 | 天天躁日日操狠狠操欧美老妇 | 国产成人精品久久亚洲高清不卡p | 久久手机观看学生会 | 91大神在线精品网址 | 亚洲国产精品精华 | 精品国产亚洲福利一区二区 | 亚洲日韩欧美少妇精品 | 精品福利视频导航 | 人妻丰满熟妇V无码区A片免费看 | 波多野吉衣免费一区 | 久久人妻蜜桃 | 亚洲日本精品中文字幕久久 | 亚洲国产精品综合福利专区 | 久久久久久久久久久福利 | 99久久免费国产精品久久 | 99久久国产综合精品五月天喷水一个少妇二区黑人久久老师 | a级毛片免费看久久 | 欧美又粗又深又猛又爽A片免费看 | 国产精品呻吟一区二区三区 | 精品午夜中文字幕熟女人妻在线 | 国产亚洲日韩在线播放人成 | 日韩av无码一区二区三区不卡 | 日韩一二三区免费视频 | 国产亚洲欧洲另类精品 | 国产精品麻豆视频 | 精品国产亚洲一区二区在线 | 成人午夜影院在 | 欧美日韩视频 | 五月色丁香综合成人网 | 色情毛片AAAAAA片 | 国精品无码一区二区三区在线A片 | 乱子伦小说500短篇 乱子伦一区二区三区 | 久久91综合国产91久久精品 | 精品久久久久久综合日本 | 久久精品青青大伊人av | 年轻的老师5理伦片 | 久久久全国免费视频 | 亚洲国产成人bt天堂 | 成年黄网站18禁免费 | 国产日韩美国成人 | 欧美精品一区天堂久久 | 天美传媒新剧国产网站 | 国产精品第1页 | 激情文学小说区另类小说同性 | 日本网站色情乱码 | 久久视频精品3线视频在线观看 | 久久久精品3d动漫一区二区三区 | 911国产传媒在线麻豆 | 亚洲精品成人专区在线观看 | 精品国产成人在线 | 国产欧美日产一区二区三区 | 欧美亚洲另类自拍丝袜 | 国产91特黄特色a级毛片 | 东京一本到熟无码免费视频 | 1024手机在线看片 | 成人h动漫精品一区二区无码 | 一区二区三区国产好的精华液 | 国产欧美精品一区二区三区 | 美女扒开腿让男人桶视频在线观看 | 亚洲男人天堂岛 | 欧洲精品免费一区二区三区 | 日本高清一区二区三区无码 | 亚洲国产精品二区久久 | 一本道久久综合狠狠躁 | 岛国大片在线免费观看 | 精品视频在线观看一区二区 | 国产a级毛片久久久久久 | 日本人丰满xhd | 国产 亚洲 黑人 | 欧美乱人伦中文字幕在线不卡 | 99久久66久久精品国产片 | 2024天天久久躁日日躁狠狠躁 | 综合国产精品 | 国产精品不卡无码v在线播放 | 欧美又粗又大AAAAA级毛片 | 国产制服丝袜免费视频 | 午夜精品久视频在线观看 | 无码专区人妻系列制服丝袜 | 婷婷婷影院 | 在线观看免费亚洲高清无 | a中文字幕在线不卡 | 精品国产精品国产偷麻豆 | 天天久久夜夜 | 国产av丝袜一区二区三区 | 中文字幕精品波多野结衣 | 欧美亚洲国产日韩一区二区三区 | 精品国产96亚洲一区二区三区 | 国产欧洲精品自在自线官方 | 免费a级黄毛片 | 成人免费在线一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久久久中文字幕 | 国产高清无码一区 | 久久精品成人无码A片小说 久久精品国产亚洲AV成人 | 成人国产精品免费视频 | 久久久久久久久久久大尺度免费视频 | 成人免费在线一区二区三区 | 无码一区二区三区av免费 | 在线99精品视频 | 国产成人精品免费视频大全麻豆 | 久久久国产精品免费a片分 久久久国产精品免费A片分环卫 | 欧美亚洲综合另类无码 | 日韩精品欧美一区二区三区 | 亚洲无码一线 | 制服 丝袜 亚洲 中文 综合 | 亚洲成色A片202477在线小说 | 欧美国产精品va在线观看 | AV无码A片高潮AV | 久九九精品免费视频 | 日韩不卡久久 | 亚洲自偷自拍另类 | 国产丝袜在线精 | 成人精品一区二区久久 | 视频亚洲一区 | 国产成人高清在线观看播放 | a级毛片高清免费视频在线播放 | 日本网站在线播放 | 久久综合丝袜精品东京热 | 高清免费视频 | 黄网站在线观看 | 无码国产伦精品一区二区三区视频 | 日b在线| 无码一区国产欧美在线资源 | 人妻激情偷乱视频一区二区三区 | 精品视频一区在线观看 | 精品福利一区二区三区精品 | 国产精品1卡二卡三卡四卡乱码 | 精品亚洲av无码一区 | 高清另类国产中国在线播放欧美 | 狠狠色丁香久久婷婷 | 无码av中文字幕久久专区 | 无码人妻一区二区三区免费n鬼沢 | 久久久久精品国产亚洲av | 日韩精品无码专区免费播放 | 忘忧草在线影院www日本 | 国产成人a在线观看视频免费 | 亚洲熟女乱综合一区二区在线 | 日本在线视频一区二区 | 欧美国产伦久久久久久 | 亚洲国产精品无损 | av天堂无码资源网 | 无套内谢少妇毛片A片软件 无套内谢少妇毛片A片小说色噜噜 | 欧美精品国产综合久久 | 国产美女精品视频 | 五月天婷婷丁香花综合缴情 | 老师的丰满大乳奶水在线观看 | 成A人无码成牛牛 | 欧美性猛交xxxxx按摩欧美 | 91精品国产麻豆福利在线 | 成人妻片无码 | 不卡无码免费播放高清视频精品一区二区三区亚洲第一免 | 久久伊人少妇熟女伊人精品 | 欧美少妇国产亚洲精品成人aa片小说 | 看一级毛片一区二区三区免费 | 欧美性生交活XXXXXDDDD | 欧美阿v视频在线大全 | 久久久久综合一本久道 | 蜜桃无码av一区二区 | 波多野结衣一区二区免费视频 | 久久成人国产精品免费 | 永久免费精品黄页入口 | 海角国精产品一区一区三区糖心行业总结 | 狠狠色丁香婷婷综合欧美 | 激情综合婷婷色五月蜜桃 | 精品国产涩涩污免费网站 | 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三区 | 精品国产一区二区三区久久久狼 | 九一传媒果冻制片厂 | 丁香五月婷婷av | 亚洲国产av一区二区三区四区 | 日操天天操夜夜操 | 91婷婷韩国欧美一区二区 | 精品国产一级毛片国语版 | 国产成人无码精品久久久免 | 大香线蕉伊人久久爱 | 午夜免费视频 | 久久久久无码国产精品一区中文字幕 | 2024国产成人福利精品视频 | 久久国产亚洲精品麻豆 | 日本小视频免费 | 亚洲精品无码A片一区二区三区 | 久久无码一区人妻A片蜜臀 久久无码中文字幕免 | 国产欧美一区二区精品仙草咪 | 亚洲国产成人在线观看免费 | 亚洲日韩av无码一区二区三区 | 成人无码大片a毛片 | 老鸭窝亚洲图片欧美一区 | 另类小说第1页综合 | 麻豆一区二区在我观看 | 国产成人无码免费看片色哟哟 | 波多野结衣黄色 | 国产成人A片免费观看 | 国产真实偷乱视频在线观看 | 少妇人妻系列无码专区视频 | 亚洲激情一区 | 国产三级精品最新在线 | 国产私拍精品名人 | 免费精品国产人妻国语三上优雅 | 亚洲国产精品综合久久网各 | 久久男人av资源网站无码软件 | 国产高清av日韩精品欧美激情国产一区 | 久久精品免费看 | 日本一卡二卡三四卡在线观看免费视频 | 国产爆乳无码视频在线观看3 | 成人日日射视频 | 日本黄色网址大全 | 欧美性高清video | 无码人妻精品中文字幕手机版 | 成人三级在线 | 国产69囗曝吞精在线视频 | 一本久道久久综合丁香五月 | 日本不卡不码高清免费 | 四虎影视在线看 | 国产系列丝袜熟女精品视频 | 成人免费在线一区二区三区 | 乱子轮视频在线看 | 91精品啪在线观看国产色 | 欧美日韩制服丝袜六区 | 久久福利国产 | 欧美丝袜熟女高清 | 国产成人h在线观看网站站 国产成人h在线视频 | 糖心vlog一区二区三区在线 | 国产一区免费视频 | 亚洲综合国产成人丁香五月激情 | 国产精品无码无卡在线观 | 国产免费午夜高清 | 精品国产一区二区三区四区特色 | 欧美午夜福利1000集2019年 | 69精品人妻一区二区三区香蕉 | 国产亚洲精品一区二区三区 | 2024国产精品一卡2卡三卡 | 免费看片的黄色软件 | 国产麻豆福利 | 精品久久久久久无码专区 | 久草中文网 | 狠狠色伊人亚洲综合网站l 狠狠色影院 | 欧美精品久久96人妻无码 | 国内精品久久久久影院 | 在线观看成人无码中文av天堂 | 亚洲情在线 | 麻花豆传媒国产剧MV免费软件 | 日本韩国三级 | 成人a级毛片免费播放 | 亚洲自偷自拍另类图区 | 国色天香网站 | 国产午夜大秀一区二区三区 | 人体无码免费在线观看 | 国产成人精品视频一区二区三区 | 国产成人无码免费看片色哟哟 | a级免费在线短视频 | 成人一区在线 | 国产成人久久精品流白浆动态 | 伊人色综合网一区二区三区 | 成人午夜AV亚洲精品无码网站 | 麻豆精品无人区码一二三区别 | 激情综合网五月激情 | 美女裸露胸部100%无遮挡 | 成人亚洲欧美日韩在线 | 精品国产福利盛宴在线观看精品无码极品久久一二三区 | 色偷偷免费视频 | 国产不卡视频一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲AV综合久久九九 | 狠狠婷婷爱综合狠狠婷婷 | 天堂久久精品9966国产精品一区在线观看你懂的 | 久久精品伊人无码一区 | 国产福利视频一区二区在线播放 | 久久中文骚妇内射 | 日本中文字幕一区二区三区不卡 | 国产欧美丝袜二区在线 | 国产极品JK白丝喷白浆在线观看 | a级毛片免费更新不卡 | 国产成人香蕉在线视频fuz | 亚洲一区在线观看无码欧美 | 久激情内射婷内射蜜桃人妖 | 乱伦亚洲三级自拍 | 亚洲国产va乱码毛片一级高清三 | 99精品国产高清一区二区麻豆 | 久久久久国产一级毛片高清版新婚 | videos日本熟妇人妻多毛亚洲欧美avwww | 久久久久99精品国产片 | 久久久久久国产潘金莲 | 成人国产经典视频在线观看网 | 久久99国产精一区二区三区蜜桃 | 欧美激情久久久久久久大片 | 中文字幕无码久久东京热 | 国产无套露脸在线观看 | 精品一区二区三区高清免费不卡 | 五月婷婷 | 亚洲午夜国产精品无码老牛影视 | 亚洲三级在线观看 | 99久久精品免费观看区一 | 日本中文字幕最新资源 | 麻豆国产av超爽剧情系列 | 国产精品系列一区二区三区 | 久久久久久综合一区中文字幕 | 中文字幕永久在线 | 久久精品国产亚洲av无码偷窥 | 一区二区三卡无 | 国产午夜三级一区二区三 | 国产精品人妻无码 | 99久久精品国产综合一区 | 亚洲国产精品午夜伦不卡 | 伊人角狠狠狠狠 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久蜜臀 | 伊人久久大香线蕉综合5g | 国产精品亚洲欧美日韩久久 | 成人性大片免费观看网站YY |