Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

精品东京热,精品动漫无码,精品动漫一区,精品动漫一区二区,精品动漫一区二区三区,精品二三四区,精品福利导航,精品福利導航。

【inflating pregnant belly sex video】Enter to watch online.AMD FSR 4 is Very Impressive: 1440p Upscaling Tested

AMD really needs FSR 4 to be inflating pregnant belly sex videogreat. Throughout the last two GPU generations, gamers have been abandoning Radeon for GeForce, and a key contributing factor to this is DLSS. Nvidia has continued to improve DLSS upscaling year over year, culminating in their latest release with DLSS 4 which is even better than before.

Meanwhile, AMD has been slipping further behind, especially for gaming at popular resolutions like 1440p, as their FSR 2.2 and FSR 3.1 upscalers just haven't been competitive enough. In most games, Nvidia has been delivering a much higher quality visual experience with upscaling enabled, and Radeon sales have suffered as a result.

Why test at 1440p? Because it is a more common resolution than 4K, and previous versions of FSR struggled at 1440p. To be a truly viable option for gamers, AMD needs to deliver high-quality results at this resolution. It is far more important than 4K – if they get 1440p right, they will almost certainly get 4K right as well.

But that could all change with FSR 4. AMD is finally releasing an upscaler for gamers that's built around an AI model, promising significant improvements to visual quality. Previous versions of FSR used more traditional algorithms, which allowed for broad GPU support, but the quality suffered in comparison to DLSS.

With FSR 4 using AI – AMD says it's a hybrid of a CNN and Transformer model – it's much more likely to be competitive with DLSS. But where exactly does FSR 4 fall? Can it match DLSS 3? Beat DLSS 3? Match DLSS 4? That's what we will be exploring in detail throughout this article and the accompanying video footage.

To assess FSR 4 image quality, we will be analyzing 14 different aspects of upscaling, including texture quality, edge stability, ghosting, disocclusion, foliage, particles, water, and more. The goal is to compare FSR 4 to DLSS, so we are carrying over many of our tests from recent DLSS 4 evaluations. However, FSR 4 game support differs slightly from DLSS, so there are some new titles included, though the areas of focus remain the same.

How Does FSR 4 Work?

Unlike previous FSR versions that were designed to be broadly compatible, FSR 4 only works on RDNA 4 graphics cards like the Radeon RX 9070 XT. This is because it uses FP8 processing, which isn't accelerated on previous RDNA GPUs. As a result, FSR 4 cannot be used on RDNA 3 or older GPUs, and likely never will be, even though AMD has left the door open for potential support.

Accessing FSR 4 is very similar to Nvidia's latest implementation of DLSS 4. Some games have native integrations – simply enable FSR 4 in the game, and you're good to go. For other titles, you can upgrade them from FSR 3.1 to FSR 4 using AMD's driver, similar to Nvidia's DLSS override feature.

However, there are a couple of important things to note. First, a game must have implemented at least FSR 3.1 to be upgrade-compatible, as that was the first release to use a DLL. Games using older versions of FSR, like 2.2 or 3.0, cannot be upgraded, which is disappointing since those versions make up the majority of FSR-supported titles. Second, AMD uses a game whitelist similar to Nvidia, so only approved FSR 3.1 titles have the FSR 4 upgrade toggle.

At present, most FSR 4-supported games are getting FSR 4 via the driver upgrade toggle rather than native game integration. However, during the review period, some FSR 3.1 titles were not supported, such as Stalker 2 and Indiana Jones and the Great Circle. Presumably, those titles will need to be whitelisted, making future driver updates crucial.

We are kicking off the analysis of FSR 4 with a look at 1440p. Why 1440p? Because it is a more common resolution than 4K, and previous versions of FSR struggled at 1440p. To be a truly viable option for gamers, AMD needs to deliver high-quality results at this resolution. It is far more important than 4K – if they get 1440p right, they will almost certainly get 4K right as well. This is a stress test, and we are holding nothing back.

All FSR 4 examples were captured at 1440p using the Radeon RX 9070 XT, while all other examples were captured using the GeForce RTX 5090. A selection of games was used, with settings such as motion blur, grain, vignette, and chromatic aberration disabled.

Sharpness was set to 0 for upscaling unless otherwise specified. All DLSS 3 examples were upgraded to DLSS 3.8.10, except for Hunt: Showdown, which remains on DLSS 3.7 as it cannot be upgraded. All DLSS 4 examples utilize the latest model via Nvidia's driver override.

Let's get into it.

FSR 3 vs FSR 4

FSR 4 is a significant improvement over FSR 3.1 in almost every way. FSR 4 is much less blurry in motion and far more stable. In areas with fine detail, FSR 4 is a night-and-day difference in reducing sizzling and grain, particularly in elements like hair and grass.

For a while, we thought we might have to censor FSR 3.1 images because YouTube doesn't allow offensive content on the platform, but after checking the guidelines, we think it's okay – even if it has the potential to scorch your eyeballs. Just cover your eyes if it gets too ugly.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

The difference is so massive and so obvious while gaming that it barely seems like these two technologies belong to the same family or even deserve the same name. This is almost like the leap from DLSS 1 to DLSS 2.

This improvement is evident in every example using the Quality mode. If we switch to the Performance mode, it's actually surprising that AMD allowed people to use the FSR 3.1 Performance mode at 1440p because it produces terrible image quality – really, really awful.

FSR 4 is actually somewhat usable at 1440p in Performance mode. Yes, there are some issues in motion, but not the kind that blur and sizzle the entire screen. The difference is so significant that it's hard to describe – if the FSR 4 Performance mode represents true 1440p, then the FSR 3.1 image in comparison is, what, like 360p at best?

We were blown away by some of these comparisons because we weren't expecting FSR 4 to improve this much in Performance mode at 1440p. FSR 3.1 was so far behind DLSS in this configuration that we expected an improvement but still anticipated some level of disappointment. Gone are the days of FSR being completely useless at upscaling from a low render resolution.

Now, the real testfor FSR 4 is how it compares to DLSS 3 and DLSS 4. Beating FSR 3.1 is nice, but that bar was relatively low.

The real challenge is competing with the industry leader in upscaling, so for the rest of this article, we will primarily compare FSR 4 with DLSS. How do these technologies compare in terms of blur and texture quality?

Textures and Blur

FSR 4 holds up really well in this regard. Previously, we found that DLSS 4 had practically eliminated TAA blur in motion, even down to the Performance mode at 1440p. This meant that texture quality was enhanced and the overall image appeared sharper relative to DLSS 3 and even native rendering. The same applies when comparing FSR 4 to DLSS 3 using the same modes – in this case, Quality vs. Quality.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

In this Spider-Man 2 example, we are rapidly switching between a still shot while stationary and a still shot captured mid-motion. The DLSS 4 version preserves almost the same level of detail and sharpness whether stationary or in motion. DLSS 3 appears quite blurry in motion compared to the stationary image. FSR 4 sits somewhere between the two, with significantly better clarity in motion than DLSS 3, but not quite reaching the level of DLSS 4.

This trend was observed in other games we tested, though results varied depending on the title and scene. For example, in Hunt: Showdown, FSR 4 was much closer to DLSS 3 than DLSS 4 in terms of clarity. However, in The Last of Us Part I, the reverse was true, and FSR 4 was much closer to DLSS 4. In all of these examples, in-game sharpness was set to 0, ensuring no additional sharpening was applied after the upscale pass.

It also doesn't seem like FSR 4 is simply sharpening a blurry image; rather, it appears to be handling fine texture details in motion more effectively. There are some aspects of the DLSS 3 image that cannot be sharpened to match the clarity of FSR 4, which generally gives AMD's upscaler the edge. This is great news since image crispness is a major selling point for DLSS 4, and in many cases, FSR 4 is competitive in this aspect.

The performance of these upscalers across various quality settings remains relatively consistent. This means that the clarity of the Quality mode and the clarity of the Performance mode follow similar trends.

In some instances, DLSS 4's Performance mode is sharper and better than FSR 4's Quality mode, though this doesn't necessarily hold true for other aspects of image quality. There are also situations where distinguishing which upscaler provides better clarity requires zooming in, which is a great result for FSR 4. In most cases, we preferred its sharpness over DLSS 3.

Edge Stability

Next up is edge stability. You might have noticed in some of the previous shots that FSR 4 can struggle with maintaining stable edges in motion, particularly with characters. However, this issue was primarily observed in the two Insomniac games we used for testing – Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart and Marvel's Spider-Man 2 – both of which use the same game engine.

For some reason, in these specific games, FSR 4 is more prone to aliased character edges compared to DLSS 4 and DLSS 3, which can look unappealing in certain scenes.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

However, when switching to similar third-person titles like Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered and The Last of Us Part I, this aliased edge issue was not present, and the stability of character edges in motion appeared fine. It's unclear why this happens, but in a worst-case scenario, FSR 4 does not preserve edge stability in motion as well as DLSS 3.

Outside of these cases, FSR 4 delivers mixed results. While it represents a huge step forward compared to FSR 3, in the best examples, it only matches DLSS 3 in stability – while DLSS 4 remains far ahead in preserving stable edges and details between frames.

For example, in Ratchet & Clank, both FSR 4 and DLSS 3 performed similarly in maintaining stair edges as the player approached them. A similar trend was observed in Spider-Man 2. In Hunt: Showdown, aliasing and shimmering levels were comparable when looking at FSR 4 Quality versus DLSS 3 Quality, with DLSS 4 clearly superior in this regard.

In other situations, FSR 4 is not as stable as DLSS 3 when comparing the same quality settings. For instance, in The Last of Us Part I, FSR 4 struggled in slow pan shots, creating instabilities on bricks and window edges – artifacts that were absent in the DLSS 3 image and could be somewhat distracting.

Strangely, in The Last of Us Part I, FSR 4 Balanced mode actually outperformed DLSS 3 Balanced in some cases, with little difference in stability between the two FSR 4 modes. At times, FSR 4 Balanced even appeared more stable than FSR 4 Quality, which is unexpected. FSR 4 winning in a Balanced vs. Balanced comparison was quite common, meaning that at worst, FSR 4 is only half or even less than half a quality tier behind DLSS 3.

The challenge AMD faces is that DLSS 4 Performance mode is often more stable than DLSS 3 Quality mode, which means DLSS 4 Performance also surpasses FSR 4 Quality. It's possible that AMD prioritized reducing blur over improving stability, as FSR 4 is generally the sharper but less stable image compared to DLSS 3. Meanwhile, DLSS 4 delivers the best of both worlds. This is one of the biggest areas AMD needs to focus on when improving future versions of FSR 4.

Ghosting

When it comes to ghosting, all upscalers are prone to it in the worst cases. Fortunately, across most of the examples we analyzed, FSR 4 is not particularly susceptible to ghosting and does not introduce ghosting in areas where DLSS does not.

Most of the time, performance is comparable, so for example, when examining particle effects in Ratchet & Clank, both DLSS 3 and FSR 4 exhibit minor ghosting, just at different times. However, DLSS 4 is relatively more resilient in this scenario.

There's another example from Spider-Man 2, where each algorithm is triggered by slightly different conditions, but no technique is completely immune. Unfortunately, we couldn't put FSR 4 through the Forza Motorsport test since FSR 4 is not supported in that title. However, in the games we did test, FSR 4 is unlikely to cause significant ghosting issues.

Disocclusion

A major win for FSR 4 comes in the area of disocclusion. Among the three main techniques examined here, FSR 4 generally provides the best image quality, or at the very least, matches DLSS 3, which was previously the leader.

As we found in the DLSS 4 analysis, DLSS 4 prioritizes a sharper image, often resulting in worse disocclusion than DLSS 3, leading to more sizzling around characters in third-person games. In titles such as The Last of Us Part I, this trend holds when comparing DLSS 4 to FSR 4 – AMD's technology comes out ahead with fewer noticeable artifacts at the same Quality mode.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

It is harder to distinguish differences in games like Horizon Zero Dawn, but upon closer inspection, there is slightly less fizz around Aloy when running in the FSR 4 images compared to DLSS 3, and especially DLSS 4.

In Hunt: Showdown, the DLSS 4 image appears slightly smeared around the gun in motion, while FSR 4 remains relatively clean with only a few disocclusion artifacts, with DLSS 3 performing similarly to FSR 4.

In many situations, disocclusion artifacts in DLSS 4 are not particularly noticeable, as they typically disappear within a few frames, making them difficult to detect during real-time gameplay. However, the most impressive aspect here is that AMD has gone from having the worst disocclusion handling, with frequent sizzling around characters, to essentially having the best implementation at 1440p.

Hair

Hair quality is very similar across all three upscalers. When comparing images in Quality mode, we did not find many substantial differences in motion, even in challenging scenarios such as Aloy's hair billowing as she runs.

The detail, stability, and clarity of the hair are virtually identical between FSR 4 and DLSS, meaning the ugly grain seen constantly with FSR 3 is no longer an issue. This element is now being upscaled effectively.

This applies across various games, including fur rendering in Ratchet & Clank. The only major difference is that the edge of the fur appears aliased using FSR 4. However, this issue seems to be related to the aliasing problems observed in Insomniac games, as discussed earlier.

This type of artifact is not present in a title like The Last of Us Part I. Speaking of The Last of Us, it was reassuring to see decent beard stability, as well as slightly improved hair rendering in one specific example when comparing FSR 4 to DLSS.

It is also not a case where DLSS outperforms FSR at lower quality settings. When lowering DLSS to Balanced while keeping FSR 4 in Quality mode, FSR typically appeared slightly better in this comparison. This represents a strong result for AMD's upscaler in this area.

Particles

Particle quality presents mixed results. When observing confetti in Ratchet & Clank, there is a significant difference in how FSR 4 renders it compared to DLSS 3 and 4. With FSR 4, the confetti appears much sharper and clearer, but this also exposes more aliasing on the edges, which is less noticeable in the softer DLSS presentation.

As a result, the confetti can flicker slightly in an unzoomed image, whereas DLSS 4, in particular, produces a much smoother output. However, FSR 4 demonstrates noticeably less ghosting in this area compared to DLSS 3, making it the superior option in some respects. That said, overall, DLSS 4 looks the best, with FSR 4 Quality only really being comparable to DLSS 4 Performance.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

The results were different in The Last of Us Part I when examining dense spore clouds. Here, FSR 4 looked particularly strong, especially in comparison to DLSS 3, which suffered significantly from ghosting. Compared to DLSS 4, FSR 4 actually reconstructed more spore particles, though DLSS 4 handled minor ghosting and shimmering more effectively.

Based on these examples, FSR 4 particle quality should generally be superior to DLSS 3 in most scenarios and potentially approach DLSS 4 levels.

Transparency

We were very impressed with the quality of transparencies in FSR 4. This was a major weakness in FSR 3 and 2.2, where transparencies appeared garbled and looked terrible.

With FSR 4, transparencies are much clearer, more stable in motion, and have better detail, eliminating the poor quality seen in previous versions. In fact, FSR 4 is on par with DLSS 3 and 4, with DLSS 4 perhaps having a slight edge.

Not only are transparencies well-handled while standing still – something that was often an issue with FSR 3 – but fire also benefits significantly from superior reconstruction. Grainy, pixelated fire is much less common in FSR 4, resulting in image quality similar to DLSS.

In Ratchet & Clank, the rotating hologram is clearer and resolves detail better, though DLSS 4 is slightly less aliased for some of the fine lines. The transparent logo on top of the store character now looks like any other element in the game.

This also improves scenarios where characters or objects become transparent as the player moves through the game world. For example, in Spider-Man 2, when turning the camera close to a wall, Spidey briefly becomes transparent. This transparency looks very similar between DLSS and FSR 4, with DLSS 4 exhibiting slightly better edge quality, but FSR 4 still performing well.

Comparing this to FSR 3 highlights just how much of an improvement has been made, even in Balanced mode. This is a huge win for games featuring many transparent objects that require upscaling.

Fine Details

When it comes to fine detail reconstruction, FSR 4 generally does not perform as well as DLSS 3. While the two technologies can appear similar when stationary, in motion, DLSS 3 is typically more stable and better at preserving detail in fine wires and lines on distant objects.

This is especially noticeable in scenes from The Last of Us Part I, where at 1440p, FSR 4 is the least stable presentation among the options tested, while DLSS 4 is significantly more stable.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

This issue is most apparent on very fine pixel or near-pixel level wires, where FSR 4 can become aliased in motion relative to DLSS. While the DLSS 3 image is slightly blurrier, it maintains better stability. However, FSR 4 is not far behind, and in examples like Hunt: Showdown, both DLSS 3 and FSR 4 exhibit similar stability issues for fine elements.

DLSS 4 is clearly the best option for fine detail stability, meaning a lower DLSS 4 mode can often match or surpass FSR 4. In fact, there were cases where the Performance mode in DLSS 4 appeared superior to FSR 4 in Quality mode. This aligns with earlier findings on general edge stability – FSR 4 is not quite at the same level when rendering at 1440p, and this remains one of its primary weaknesses.

Trees

Tree quality is another area where FSR 4 delivers mixed results. The simplest way to describe its performance relative to DLSS 3 is that it is sharper but less stable. This creates a trade-off – depending on individual preference, some may favor the sharper FSR 4 image, while others may prefer the smoother DLSS presentation.

Several factors, such as motion speed and tree density, influence these results. For instance, in The Last of Us Part I and Horizon Zero Dawn, where a single tree is set against a relatively clean background, FSR 4's stability issues are less apparent, while its clarity advantages are more noticeable.

However, in scenes where trees overlap, FSR 4 struggles more compared to DLSS 3, as the blurrier DLSS image helps mask potential instabilities. DLSS 4 offers the best of both worlds, often delivering similar or better clarity than FSR 4, with enhanced leaf detail and improved stability.

That said, DLSS 3 does not always outperform FSR 4. In this Hunt: Showdown example, DLSS 3 maintains better stability for fine tree branch details, but the foliage itself is more stable in the FSR 4 image.

Additionally, as the quality modes are lowered, FSR 4 gains ground relative to DLSS 3. In Balanced mode, the two techniques appear similar, while in Performance mode, FSR 4 has the edge. It is only in the highest quality setting that DLSS 3 holds a noticeable advantage.

Overall, tree artifacts in FSR 4 are not particularly distracting, unlike in FSR 3, where trees often sizzled in motion and looked terrible. With FSR 4, there is a good chance that at 1440p, these artifacts will go unnoticed, making them less of a concern compared to other stability issues discussed earlier.

Grass

Grass quality in FSR 4 is very impressive, especially considering this was a major weakness in previous versions of FSR. Gone are the days of grass appearing extremely grainy and ugly in motion. At 1440p using the Quality mode, FSR 4 renders grass with detail, general stability in motion, and no grain or sizzling issues. In games like Horizon Zero Dawn, it looks fantastic, surpassing DLSS 3 in clarity and motion stability, and almost reaching the level of DLSS 4.

Other titles also showed favorable results for FSR 4, such as The Last of Us Part I. While trees can be slightly less stable in FSR 4 compared to DLSS 3, the opposite is true for grass quality, which is generally better in FSR 4. DLSS 4 holds the edge in overall stability, but FSR 4 remains highly usable. In fact, the largest gap between FSR 4 and DLSS 3, favoring FSR, was observed when viewing the very thin strands of grass in Hunt: Showdown. In this case, DLSS 3 Quality mode exhibited some graininess, while FSR 4 looked fantastic by comparison.

FSR 4 did struggle with the unusual purple grass and shrubs in Ratchet & Clank, which were less stable in the FSR 4 image compared to DLSS 3. However, in most other examples, FSR 4 delivered excellent grass quality, often matching either DLSS 4 Quality or Balanced modes.

Fences

Fence quality is another area with mixed results. For fences with thicker details and repeating patterns, FSR 4 generally delivers image quality at or slightly above DLSS 3 levels. It is much less likely to introduce ugly pattern artifacts compared to FSR 3, though it still does not reach the level of stability or artifact-free rendering seen in DLSS 4. The fact that FSR 4 offers a similar or better experience than DLSS 3 is a strong result.

For mesh-style fences with thinner details, FSR 4 struggles more. In this Spider-Man 2 example, there is noticeable sizzling and aliasing in the FSR 4 image compared to DLSS 3 in Quality mode, particularly when multiple meshes overlap.

While DLSS 3 can appear slightly soft when upscaling these details, it produces less shimmering than FSR 4, with DLSS 4 clearly performing best. However, in some cases, such as this example in Hunt: Showdown, FSR 4 holds up relatively well against DLSS 4.

A particularly strange finding was that in some fence scenarios, FSR 4 Balanced mode appeared more stable than FSR 4 Quality mode at 1440p, such as in the Spider-Man 2 overlapping meshes example.

After triple-checking, we consistently found the Balanced mode to provide better visual stability. If instability becomes an issue, it may be worth experimenting with Balanced mode instead of Quality mode.

Cloth

Cloth quality in FSR 4 is generally strong when applied to character clothing and flags flying in the wind. The differences between FSR 4 and DLSS are minimal, making this a solid result for third-person games, particularly those featuring characters with capes.

For a better representation of image quality comparisons, check out the HUB video below:

Regarding moiré effects, there is another odd situation. In a comparison of FSR 4 Quality versus DLSS 3 Quality, FSR 4 is more prone to displaying moiré artifacts, as seen in this Ratchet & Clank example. However, when comparing FSR 4 Balanced mode to DLSS 3 Quality mode, the Balanced mode actually reduces moiré artifacts compared to Quality at 1440p.

While it is still not as good as DLSS 3, the improvement is noticeable despite the lower render resolution. AMD may need to refine the Quality mode further, as there should be no situations where it performs worse than Balanced mode, yet we have already encountered several such cases.

Water

Water quality is very similar across all three technologies. Previously, FSR 3 had significant issues with aliasing on the surface of water, particularly in fast-moving streams with ripples. With FSR 4, surface quality is now comparable to DLSS 3, and in the worst cases, it is only slightly behind DLSS 4. This should no longer be a major concern when using FSR upscaling.

Rain

We were pleased to see that rain quality has been significantly improved in FSR 4. In our punishing snow test – and we are reliably informed that snow is just a magical form of rain – FSR 4 closely matches DLSS in overall quality.

Previously, with FSR 3, rain effects appeared as a blurry, smeared mess, but now FSR 4 provides a much clearer and more usable image, even when comparing Performance mode across upscalers.

In fact, FSR 4 appears slightly better than DLSS 3 in some cases. Snow particles are less blurry, and background disocclusion is handled with less grain, putting FSR 4 very close to DLSS 4 in terms of overall quality.

Performance Benchmarks

Next, we analyze performance. The benchmarking process is straightforward: we tested the Radeon RX 9070 XT using FSR 3 and FSR 4, and the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti using DLSS 3 and DLSS 4.

These cards are closely matched in overall performance, allowing for a direct comparison of the performance uplift provided by FSR relative to native rendering and DLSS relative to native rendering. Since the baseline performance of each GPU is similar, these results should be quite comparable.

We start with Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart at max settings. As observed previously, DLSS 4 runs slightly slower than DLSS 3 in this title, and we see a similar trend with FSR 4 versus FSR 3. However, the overall performance uplift from each upscaler is very similar. FSR 4 on the 9070 XT provided a 31% increase in frame rate compared to native rendering using Quality mode, while DLSS 4 on the 5070 Ti also delivered a 31% improvement. Balanced mode results were closely matched, while FSR 4 had a slight advantage in Performance mode.

In The Last of Us Part I, we recorded a 22% performance improvement using FSR 4 Quality mode compared to native TAA at 1440p on the 9070 XT. On the 5070 Ti, we observed a 24% improvement, which is very similar. At each quality level, DLSS 4 provided a slightly higher performance uplift, but the difference was minimal.

Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered already runs well on these GPUs at 1440p, so upscaling has a smaller impact. DLSS 4 provided a 16% uplift in Quality mode and a 24% uplift in Performance mode. FSR 4 showed a 14% improvement in Quality mode and a 29% improvement in Performance mode.

Results in Spider-Man 2 were similar. Here, DLSS 4 was 24% faster in Quality mode compared to native, 29% faster in Balanced mode, and 34% faster in Performance mode. FSR 4 was 22% faster in Quality mode, 26% faster in Balanced mode, and 31% faster in Performance mode. While slightly slower than DLSS, the difference was not substantial.

Looking at the geometric mean across this four-game sample, FSR 4 and DLSS 4 provide nearly identical performance boosts at 1440p on similar class hardware.

Only a few percentage points separate the two technologies. In general, we see a little over a 20% boost in Quality mode and around a 30% boost in Balanced mode. Of course, upscaling has a greater impact when the base frame rate is lower, but in these games, native rendering was typically around 100 FPS or higher, reducing the overall impact of upscaling on performance.

What We Learned

When assessing all aspects of FSR 4 upscaling at 1440p, we believe the technology comes out looking quite strong. This represents a massive step forward for AMD's upscaler at this resolution. The differences between FSR 3 and FSR 4 are enormous, providing owners of new Radeon RDNA 4 graphics cards with a significantly improved experience in supported titles.

FSR 3 was mostly unusable at 1440p and not very competitive with DLSS 3, let alone DLSS 4. It suffered from severe artifacts in motion, excessive grain and sizzling, significant blur, and an inability to handle low render resolutions. The signature "fizzled" look of FSR 3 at 1440p has been eliminated in FSR 4, making the technology not just usable, but genuinely effective without major compromises to image quality. This clears the first hurdle FSR 4 needed to overcome: it is not just barely usable but actually performs well.

What's most impressive is that FSR 4 image quality generally falls somewhere between DLSS 3 and DLSS 4. Since many gamers consider DLSS 3 good enough for 1440p gaming, matching or even exceeding that level of quality is a significant win for FSR 4. In most cases, FSR 4 should meet the expectations for image quality, delivering a pleasant experience. This has substantially narrowed the upscaling gap between AMD and Nvidia at 1440p.

What's most impressive is that FSR 4 image quality generally falls somewhere between DLSS 3 and DLSS 4.

FSR 4's biggest advantage over DLSS 3 lies in texture quality and blur reduction. AMD has effectively eliminated TAA blur, something DLSS 3 does not fully achieve. In direct comparisons, this is the most noticeable improvement – FSR 4 is simply less blurry. Additionally, FSR 4 delivers enhancements in disocclusion, grass quality, particles, and rain, often appearing less grainy than DLSS 3 in motion.

That's not to say FSR 4 is not universally superior though. Its biggest weakness is stability, which affects elements like edges, fine details, trees, and fences in motion. In the best cases, FSR 4 can be slightly more stable than DLSS 3 at 1440p, but there are many situations where DLSS 3 holds the advantage.

This creates a trade-off: FSR 4 offers better clarity but reduced stability. AMD needs to refine this area, particularly in cases where FSR 4 Balanced mode is more stable than FSR 4 Quality mode – this inconsistency needs to be addressed. Fixing this issue could further close the gap to DLSS 3. Even in instances where FSR 4 is less stable, it remains usable and is not far behind.

As we mentioned just a minute ago, overall FSR 4 image quality sits between DLSS 3 and DLSS 4, meaning DLSS 4 is still the best option for 1440p gaming. DLSS 4 essentially combines the best aspects of DLSS 3 and FSR 4: it is as clear and blur-free as FSR 4, if not clearer, while also maintaining excellent stability.

In certain situations, FSR 4 comes close to DLSS 4 – such as with transparencies, rain, and hair – but overall, DLSS 4 retains an edge in image quality. The only clear advantage FSR 4 has over DLSS 4 is in disocclusion.

This puts AMD in an interesting position. While DLSS 4 is better and delivers the highest image quality for 1440p gamers, is it worth choosing an Nvidia GPU solely for access to DLSS 4 instead of FSR 4? If this were a comparison between DLSS 4 and FSR 3, or even DLSS 3 and FSR 3, the answer would be a definitive yes – buying a GeForce GPU instead of a Radeon, even at a premium, would be justified.

But now that FSR 4 is highly usable and effective in most scenarios, the decision becomes less clear. If two hypothetical GPUs offer the same performance at the same price – one with DLSS 4 and one with FSR 4 – the GeForce GPU would still be the preferred choice due to DLSS 4's superior upscaling. However, if the Radeon GPU is cheaper, the decision becomes more difficult.

Would it be worth paying 10% more for DLSS 4? 15%? 20%? Previously, a 20% premium for DLSS was justifiable, but now that FSR 4 has significantly improved, that margin seems less reasonable. Right now, we would be satisfied playing games with FSR 4 at 1440p, but would also be willing to pay a small premium for DLSS 4. Beyond a certain price difference, however, it becomes harder to justify spending more on a GeForce GPU unless it offers additional compelling features beyond upscaling.

The next big problem for AMD, the spanner in the works, is game support. The decision to pay extra for DLSS 4 is contingent on games also supporting FSR 4. If that's not the case, if we're instead talking about DLSS 4 versus FSR 3 or FSR 2.2, then that value comparison goes out the window, making a GeForce GPU the obvious choice. In that situation, paying a 20% premium for a GeForce GPU – or even more – becomes justifiable.

The reality is right now Nvidia GPUs offer an acceptable level of upscaling in far more games than Radeon GPUs due to stronger DLSS support. While this may improve as more developers integrate FSR 4, AMD remains far behind Nvidia in game support.

This is largely because Nvidia laid the groundwork years ago with DLSS, which uses a DLL that can easily be upgraded to DLSS 4 via first-party or third-party tools. As a result, most modern titles offer, at minimum, DLSS 2 or DLSS 3, with many now supporting DLSS 4. In contrast, while some games can be upgraded to FSR 4 – and it is great to see a reasonable selection of titles at launch – many remain stuck with FSR 2.2, which significantly impacts real-world game support in Nvidia's favor.

Looking ahead, we hope to see the gap in game support and image quality continue to close. FSR 4 provides a solid foundation for this progress, but AMD still has work to do. The company needs to convince developers to update existing games to FSR 4, including major titles like Cyberpunk 2077, while ensuring future titles include FSR 4 support at launch. At the same time, AMD must continue refining its AI upscaling algorithm to improve image quality in edge cases.

Until that happens, AMD remains in an early adoption phase with FSR 4. Yes, the upscaling gap has narrowed, but it may not be closed in the games you want to play. So you'll need to factor that in to your value calculations when tossing up between GeForce and Radeon. If you strike gold with an FSR 4 game you'll be in for a pretty great experience, and we expect Radeon owners to benefit from increasing game support over the next few years.

Last but not least, based on our testing, our recommendation on quality settings at 1440p, we generally suggest using Quality mode. However, this varies by game. In most titles, Quality mode provides the best image quality, with noticeable compromises when lowering settings. However, in some games, Balanced mode can actually deliver a more stable image. If stability issues arise in Quality mode, switching to Balanced may improve the experience. Otherwise, Quality mode remains the preferred setting for most cases.

0.1469s , 14707.0859375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【inflating pregnant belly sex video】Enter to watch online.AMD FSR 4 is Very Impressive: 1440p Upscaling Tested,  

Sitemap

Top 中文字幕国产精品欧美激情 | 色成人国产欧美一区二区三区 | 四虎影视在线看完整视频 | 99久久人妻无码精品系列无遮挡韩国我电影人妻丰满 | 日本激情网址 | 国产精品乱码一区二区三区 | 99久久精品国产片 | 在线国产欧美专区 | 欧美国产中文在线字幕视频 | 日本欧美一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲精品国产第一区二区 | 97久久精品国产精品青草 | www.夜夜操.com | 久久久国产乱子伦精品 | 精品人妻系列无码天堂 | 国产又爽又大又黄A片另类 国产又爽又大又黄A片另类软件 | 粗大的内捧猛烈 | 麻豆视频免费在线 | 黄色a一级视频 | 久久久精品人妻一区二区三区四区 | 成人动漫精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产a毛片高清视频精品熟女日韩 | 成人爽a毛片一区二区免 | 欧美日韩精品视频二区 | 少妇无套内谢久久久久 | 国产思思99re99在线观看 | 好大好硬再深一点口述 | 色噜噜网小说网 | 各种肉黄浪荡故事集 | 精品视频一区二区三区中 | 国产成人午夜无码电影在线观看 | 精品亚洲aⅴ无码专区毛片 精品亚洲aⅴ在线 | 国产欧美精品三区 | 波多野结衣av一区二区全免费观看 | 无人区高清视频韩国在线观看 | 日韩国产亚洲高清在线久草 | 性色欧美 | 亚洲日本强伦姧一区二区 | SM捆绑强制玩具失禁高潮男男 | 无码人妻一区二区三区精品视频 | 91尤物国产尤物福利在线 | 国产精品亚洲电影丝袜制服校园春色 | 美女脱裤衩扒开尿口给男子摸 | 91久久99久久91熟女精品 | 欧美不卡的一区二区三区四区 | 国产一卡2卡3卡4卡网站动漫 | w色综合久久精品中文字幕 | 亚洲午夜久久久无码精品网红A片 | 久久久久女人精品毛片 | 中文字幕亚洲无线码a | 精品国产你懂的在线观看 | 一区二区三区欧美久久精品 | 麻豆精品国产一二三产区风险分析:了解市场变动与环境挑战 麻豆精品国产自产在线观看一 | 2024国内精品久久久久影院 | 男人的天堂AV亚洲一区2区 | 国产无套内精一级毛片农工o | 超碰人摸人操人摸人操 | AV成人影视综合网 | 精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 国产成人久久精品77777 | 天美传媒MV视频播放 | 国产精品人妻无码久久久免费看 | 无码一区中文字幕在线观看 | 成人av无码| 国产色综合色产在线视频 | 手机看片日韩 | 天天躁日日操狠狠操欧美老妇 | 波多野结衣乳巨码无在线观看 | 一区二区在线视频无码人妻在线二区 | 精品国产一区二区三区免费 | 久久久国产亚洲精品无码 | 亚洲国产v高清在线观看 | 免费无码一区二区三区A片视频 | 爆乳办公室在线观看 | 中文字幕奈奈美被公侵犯 | 久久久久青草大香线综合精品 | 无码国产精品一区二区色情男同 | 九九在线中文字幕无码 | 成年无码av片在线无缓冲 | 国产无线乱码新区 | 中文字幕久久天堂一区二区 | 国产丝袜足脚 | 日本日韩欧美 | 国产在线观看91精品 | 亚洲色无码中文字幕 | 日本视频中文字幕一区二区 | 麻豆精品无码国产在 | ⅴ无码专区久久精品国产 | 亚洲欧美日韩每日更新在线 | 91精品国产高久久久成人 | 亚洲自拍主播无码视频 | 久久精品第一国产久精国产宅男66 | 亚洲观看一区二区三区 | 91精品婷婷国产综合久久 | 国产精品女人久久久久 | 亚洲一欧洲中文字幕在线 | 无码精品视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲av无码成h人动漫久久久 | 亚洲日韩色欲av无码精品 | 口内射精颜射极品合集 | 国产2024精品三区在线观看 | 一区二区三区网站在线免费线观看 | 国产精品卡1在线观看 | 久久五月天综合网 | 国产亚洲欧美日韩久久图片 | 成人精品不卡在线观看 | 免费又黄又爽A片免费看 | 青青青国产精品国产精品久久久久 | 精品欧美一区二区三区久久久 | video波多野结aⅴ | 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠69 | 国产精品视频中文字幕91 | 激情爆乳一区二区三区 | 性xxxxxxx欧美胖老太肥肥 | 欧美高清日本三级人妇 | 青青久在线视频免费观看 | 国产四虎精品无码不卡免费 | 人妻aⅴ中文字幕无码免费看 | 亚洲国产精品无码专区成人 | 2024亚洲中文字幕在线第99 | 成人欧美一区二区三区黑人免费 | 久久久久久久久精品中文字幕一区 | 精品久久香蕉国产线看观看亚洲 | 人妻中文第23页 | 久久精品国产亚洲av日韩 | 欧美三级大全在线观看 | 欧美午夜艳片欧美精品 | 制服丝袜长腿无码专区第一页 | 国产成人精品无码一区国产免 | 91麻豆精品国产一区色欲 | 东京热一精品无码av | 久久五月精品中文 | 人妻无码一区二区三区欧美熟妇 | 久久久国产精品网站 | 成人v人不卡无码影片 | 五月丁香婷婷中文字幕制服丝袜 | 日本老妇乱子伦中文视频 | 国产99久久九九精品无码 | 2024精品国产 | 日韩一区二区在线观看 | 欧美另类久久久精品 | 无限观看韩国动漫免费观看大全 | 久久久久精品国产99久久综合 | 精品亚洲欧美中文字幕在线看 | 亚洲av无码码潮喷在线观看 | 四虎国产精品成人免费久久 | 波多野结衣办公室双飞 | 国产三级电影在线观看一区二区三 | 亚洲av无码成人 | 欧美极品xⅹ另类 | 日本哺乳期xhd奶水 日本不卡dvd在线视频 | 高潮喷水无码AV亚洲 | 精品久久久亚洲精品中文字幕 | 精品日韩一区二区三区 | 日本中文 | 日韩欧美不卡一区二区高清 | 天美传媒国产今日推荐 | 伊人色综合视频一区二 | 一区小说区中文字幕 | 成人三级在线观看视频 | 91精品欧美一区二区三区综合在 | 亚洲欧美日韩另类精品 | 久久久久久av无码免费网站 | 国产91精品免费视频 | 国产白丝无码免费视频 | 老熟女强人国产在线播放一区 | 伊人久久大香线蕉影院 | 中日韩精品视频一区二区三区 | 欧洲无人区卡一卡二卡三 | 激情欧美日韩一区二区亚洲乱码国产乱码精品精大量国产综合 | 无码人妻视频 | 国产欧美日韩精品一区 | 麻豆一区二区99久久久久 | 国产亚洲综合网 | 国产老熟女乱伦老熟女熟妇图片 | 人妻熟女成人免费视频 | 一区二区三区欧美日韩 | 扒开粉嫩小泬舌头伸进去视频 | 久久精品国产亚洲av孟若羽 | 97精品人妻系列无码人妻 | 日本一本免费线观看视频 | 无码不卡永久视频 | 国产高潮流白浆视频在线观看 | 久久久久亚洲aⅴ成人无码电影 | 97国产精品视频观看一 | 人妻精品在线播放 | 久久久久99精品成人片欧美一区 | 国产成人精品cao在 国产成人精品cao在线 | 国产麻豆出品 | 免费人妻无码不卡中文字幕系列 | 波多野结衣一区二区三区高清av | 全球av集中精品导航福利 | 欧美日韩另类国产欧美日韩一级 | 日本三级三级三级免费看 | 国产拍揄自揄免费观看 | 69精品人伦一区二区三区 | 亚洲a综合一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产午夜片无码区在线播放 | 精品无码久久久久久久久水蜜桃 | 丰满人妻少妇久久无码 | 成人av免费视频在线观看 | 国产精品麻豆网站 | 国产精品大全 | 国产精品爱久久久久久久小说 | 东京热一区无码视频 | 99免费在线观看视频 | 久久精品女人天堂av麻豆 | 成人av专区精品无码国产 | 欧美成人a片在线乱码视频久久久久久人妻一区二区三区 | 成人性生交大片免费看中国A片 | 91久久偷偷做嫩草影院电久久受www免费人成 | 国产91精品丝袜一区二区漫画 | 国产精品免费看久久久麻豆 | 三级中文字幕 | 亚洲国产av午夜高清入口 | 99久久亚洲视频 | 国产一区二区免费不 | 日韩永久精品一区二区p | 二区天堂国产成人无码精品久久久露 | 久久久久久无码大片a片 | 欧美日韩精品乱国产 | 久久99精品久久久久久青青日本 | av网站在线观看 | 国产又粗又猛又黄又爽A片 国产又粗又猛又爽的视频A片 | 国产成人精品免费青青草原 | 欧洲激情无码精品视频一站 | 久久精品最新免费国产成人 | 久久久国产成人精品 | 天天躁日日操狠狠操欧美老妇 | 丰满岳乱妇一区二区三区 | 国产一卡2卡三卡4卡免费网站 | 日本一丰满一bbw | 久久五月视频 | 午夜理论在线观看不卡大地影院 | 国产精品伦一区二区三级 | 国产欧美二区三区 | 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕 | 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜精品 | 精品欧美一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲日韩一页精品久久 | 搡女人真爽免费视频大全软件 | 亚洲日本一区二区三区在线观看 | 日本一区二区三区成人片 | 欧美三圾片在线观看 | 国产熟妇精品一区二区 | 中文字幕精品乱码亚洲一区 | 亚洲欧美日韩在线观看一 | 久久国产乱子伦精 | 无码av最新高清无码专区 | 国产精品免费aⅴ片在线观看 | 亚洲日韩国产成在线发布一区二区三区 | 国产福利日本一区二区三区 | 久久人妻免费观看视频 | 欧美唯美国产伦综合 | 成年无码av片在线免缓冲 | 中文字幕乱码熟女人妻水蜜桃 | 国产亚洲日韩一区二区三区在线 | 国精产品一二二区传媒公司 | 国产午夜美女av | 日本卡一卡二卡三卡四 | 国产女同女互慰 | 人妻丰满熟妇 | 2024夜夜干天天天爽 | 高清欧美性猛交xxxx黑人猛交 | 伦理片高清在线观看网站 | 国产成人亚洲欧美三区综合。 | 成人免费高清视频一区二区 | 521av国产精品电影天堂 | 成人免费无码大片a毛片抽搐 | 精品国产免费第一区久久 | 亚洲AV国产AV一区无码小说 | 亚洲综合激情另类小说区 | 中文字幕无码不卡一区二区三区 | 伊人之国产在线观看av | 亚洲视频在线一区二区三区 | 成人国产在线观看高清不卡 | 97久久精品无码一区二区 | 国产片久久 | 国产精品毛片a一区二区三 国产精品毛片a一区二区三区 | 女人精品天堂 | 亚洲国产成人久久一区二区三区 | 无码av一级毛片在 | jjzz日本老师 | 国产av片无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲一级在线观看 | 国产av一区二区精品久久凹凸 | 精品综合久久88色鬼首页 | 狠狠久久免费视频在线 | 国产免费一区二区三区香蕉精 | 国产人妻久久久精品麻豆 | 欧美激情一区二区A片成人 欧美激情一区二区久久久 欧美激情一区二区三区 | 成人欧美一区二区三区黑人孕妇 | 潮喷失禁大喷水aⅴ无码 | 国产做a爱一级毛片久久性色生活片 | 国产精品第1页 | 精品人妻一区二区三区夜夜精品 | 国产成人高清亚洲一区 | 免费无码一区二区三区A片视频 | 久久久无码A片观看免费 | 精品成人免费一区二区 | 少妇伦子伦精品无码 | 亚洲国产精品日本无码网站 | 久久不卡视频 | 人妻熟女少妇一区二区三区 | 日韩免费伦理一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久岛国免费播放 | 日韩精品在线看 | 日本亚洲中文字幕不卡 | 国产成人mv在线播放 | 日本亚欧色情 | 欧美亚洲另类综合在线中文字幕 | 久久久久国产一区二区三区成人网 | 亚洲精品国产首次亮相 | 少妇人妻千子深太紧了A片 少妇人妻呻呤 | 欧美伊香蕉久久综合类网站 | 日本天天综合网 | 亚洲午夜精品A片一区三区无码 | 插的痛的视频一卡二卡三卡 | 国产电影一区二区三区 | 大陆一级真人片免费高清 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说 | 国产成人麻豆tv在线观看 | 日本一本二本三区免费免费高清 | 精品无码久久久久久久久水蜜桃 | 2024午夜国产精品福利 | 天天综合色天天综合网 | 日本xxx在线观看免费播放 | 久久久精品区二区三区免费9亚洲国产婷婷香蕉久久久久久 | 欧洲卡2卡3卡国产乱码 | 日本一道本高清一区二区 | 国产成人欧美日本在线观看 | 大尺度做爰啪啪高潮床戏小说 | 少妇的肉体aa片免费 | 91麻豆国产福利在线观看精品 | 国产欧美精品一区二区粉嫩 | 韩国精品一区二区三区无码 | 日本精品一区二区三区高清 | 亚洲国产精品无码加勒比 | 国产午夜精品无码理论片 | 99久久99久久 | 在线看欧美日韩中文字幕 | 欧美日韩国产亚洲综合不卡 | 五月天国产精品 | 国产一区二区视频在线观看 | 久久久久久国产一级av片 | 国产国产人精品视频69 | 久久不卡视频 | 人妻系列无码专区久久五月天 | 国产精品色吧国产精品 | 中文字幕久久精 | xxxx人妻中国xxxxxl19学生 | 亚洲蜜桃mv在线播放 | 国产伦精品十在线观看 | 熟女乱色综合小说 | 亚洲偷色精品一区二区三区 | 艳妇乳肉豪妇荡乳a亚洲 | 人妻系列无码专区免费视频 | 亚洲国产人在线一区二区三区 | 国产欧美目韩91综合一区婷婷久久久 | 日韩乱码精品字幕一区 | 一边吃奶一边做边爱hd在线视频播放 | 国产aⅴ视频免费观看国语 国产aⅴ视频一区二区三区 | 国产女人乱人伦精品一区二区 | 日本熟妇乱子a片另类 | 国产精品伦一区二区在线 | 91手机看片国产永久免费 | 成人一区在线 | 国产亚洲欧洲av综合一区高清 | 精品丰满熟妇高潮一区 | 久久福利国产 | 日韩美女免费视频 | 人妻系列无码一区二区三区 | 麻豆一区二区免费播放网站 | 国产裸体美女视频全黄扒开 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久久鸭绿欲 | 国产视频一区二区三区四区五 | 2024久久国产综合精品swag | 国产极品尤物精品在线免费观看 | 无码高清另类影院 | 69毛片| 2024人人干人人操 | 亚洲产国偷V产偷V自拍A片 | 久久久久无码精品国产a | 精品久久久亚洲精品中文字幕 | 无码潮喷A片无码高潮小说 无码成a∧人片在线播放 | 国产极品精频在线观看 | 精品久久香蕉国产线看观看亚洲 | 国产91精品久线在线观看 | 国产综合色精品在线视频 | 久久人妻精品国产一区二区 | 日本公妇里乱片A片在线播放保姆 | 久久精品中文字幕第一页 | 精品国产人妻一区二区三区免费 | 69久久夜色精品国产69小说 | 美女扒开尿口给男人爽免费视频日韩欧美第一区二区三区 | 亚洲日本在线免费观看 | 99久久一区二区 | 日韩精品视频美在线精品视频 | 91精品国产综合久久久 | 国产三级自拍视频 | 四虎必出精品亚洲高清 | 精品国产免费久久久一区二区 | 亚洲情在线最近免费大全免费版视频日 | 久久久久久久国产免费看 | 无码h黄肉动漫在线观看网站 | 天美麻花星空大象在线看 | 国产成人久久综合第一区 | 无码视频在线观看免费专区 | 91精品无码中文字幕在线 | 国产精品一区二区制服丝袜 | 精东影业传媒网站进入 | 国产精品久久久久久 | 无码专区人妻系列视频 | 国产色欲av一区二区三区 | 国产无码在线视频高清无删减 | 中文三 级 黄 色 片 | 久久久亚洲欧洲日产国产成人 | 国产精品嫩草影院一二三区 | 国产成人福利精品在线观看 | 99久久蜜精 | 久久伊人在 | 亚洲乱码日产精品M | 成人中文国产手机免费 | 成人在线高清不卡免费视频 | 久久久久中国男同gay片 | 日本人妻丰满熟妇久久久久久 | 黄色一级网站国产成人毛片精品一区二区三区中文字幕 | 亚洲精品AV中文字幕在线 | 无码人妻精品一区二区三区蜜臀 | 一本久道久久综合婷婷五月 | 久久大香香蕉国产免费网站 | 精品国产亚洲人成在线观看芒果 | 久久久久久精品国产免 | 国产日产欧产精品精品推荐在线 | 国产亚洲精品美女久久久久变态 | 国产日韩精品无码区免费专区国产 | 成人无码a级毛片免费 | 免费的又色又爽又黄的视频软件 | av成人无码无在线观看 | 国产人妖视频一区 | 2024av亚洲男人的天堂 | 欧美国产日本 | 一男一女做爰高潮A片韩剧 一女被多男灌满白浆受孕 一女被两男吃奶添下A片免费网站 | 91无码人妻一区二区成人aⅴ | 国产成人精品视频VA片 | 国产成人精品亚洲观看一区五月天 | 国产精品无码一区二区三区毛片 | 岛国色情A片无码视频免费看 | 欧美丰满熟妇 | 无码国产偷倩在线播放老年人 | 国产AV亚洲国产AV麻豆 | 国产亚洲欧美日韩综合一 | 久久久麻豆视频高清无码 | 国产综合色网站 | 视频一区视频二区在线观看 | 福利精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 久久国产亚洲高清观看 | 小黄人福利导航 | 国产91亚洲精品 | 波多野结衣免费视频观看 | 欧美色综合精品视频在线观看 | 日韩欧美亚洲一区中文字幕 | 久久精品国产亚洲av无码四区 | 国产精品18夜夜嗨AV | 国产一区二区草草影院 | 少妇人妻雪白丰满的肉体视 | 久久综合给合久久97色美利坚 | 麻豆app官网安卓版下载 | 国产精品毛片久久 | 人妻少妇 | 日本高清视频网站www | 国产人在线成免费视频 | 国产精品久久久久久亚洲小说 | 欧美A级肉欲大片XXX | 99久久精品日本一区二区免费网站直播老师欧美综合熟妇99 | 国产内久| 青草草97久热精品视频 | 国产成人尤物精品一区 | 国产精品乱码一区二区三 | 欧美日韩另类精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品中文字幕无乱码麻豆 | 在线观看你懂得 | 人妻斩 无码在线 | 四虎欧美在线观看免费 | 精品久久久久久久一区二区 | 国产亚洲精品第一区香蕉 | 精品国产一区二区三区免费看 | 金瓶梅在线 | 四房播播最新网址 | 无码 制服 丝袜 国产 另类 | 丝袜亚洲另类 | 天美传媒免费观看 | a亚洲在线观看不卡高清 | 成人图片视频在线91小视频在线观看 | 一区二区国内视频精品 | 国产99区| 91中文字幕 国产 高清 | 色婷婷视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲色无码专区在线 | 国产成人黄色视频在线播放 | 欧美精品久久久久久无码人妻 | 免费国产一级特黄aa大 | 精品国产一区二区三区香蕉在线 | 国产超清无码专区 | 人妻熟女一二三区夜夜爱 | 亚洲欧美人成无码苍井空 | 精品高清国产日本 | 国产av电影区二区三区 | 成人片黄网站色大片免费观看cn | AV综合色一区二区三区 | 無码一区中文字幕少妇熟女网站 | snh48亚洲大片免费国产 | 91精品国产一区二区 | 国产精品久久久精品视频 | 成人精品无码四虎影视av | 久久久亚洲国产精品性色 | 国产三级三级国产看了么网站 | 亚洲欧美日本在线 | 国内精品久久久久影院 | 99久久无色码中文字幕人妻蜜柚 | 亚洲深夜视频 | 久久久国产高清 | 日本人妻仑乱少妇A级毛片一 | 日韩精品专区在线影院重磅 | 欧美日韩高清在线观看 | 精品麻豆一区二区三区乱码 | 亚洲A片无码一区二区三区在线 | 国产成人精品免费视 | 一区二区成人国产精品 | 91午夜一区二区 | 丁香花在线观看免费观看图片 | 欧美日韩亚洲中文字幕 | 欧美日韩一区二区三区四区在线观看 | 国产精品欧美一区二区三区四区 | 欧美一区二区视频 | 日韩欧美国产一区精品 | 亚洲国产日韩专区无码 | 性欧美久久 | 国产三级电影免费观看 | 成人免费精品网站在线观看影片 | 国产欧美一区二区三区四区 | 亚洲aⅴ无码日韩av无码网站 | 久99久热只有精品国产99 | 久久久久人妻一区精品 | 久久久久亚洲av无码观看 | 一区二区三区视频在线观看 | 久久午夜免费鲁丝片 | 国产成人精品久久久久 | 成人区色情综合小说 | 岛国精品无码少妇在线 | AV无码国产精品午夜A片麻豆 | 欧美人又长又大又粗无码视频一区 | 久久国产露脸老熟女熟69 | 亚洲AV无码久久精品色欲 | 波多野结衣中文字幕一区二区 | 无码久久久久久中文字幕视频 | 久久免费小视频 | 久久精品无码亚洲一区二区 | 成人免费无码大片搞中出 | 亚洲永久精品国产大片 | 亚洲一区二区在线波多野 | 精品丝袜中文字幕乱码 | 国产一区二区三区不卡在线观看 | 欧美日韩亚洲另类在线观看 | 久久久网久久久久合久久久久 | 麻豆一区区三三四区产品麻豆 | 国产成人三级在线视频网站观看 | 亚洲自偷自拍另类图片 | 国产亚洲精品久久久一区 | 久久精品最新免费国产成人 | 成人区人妻精品一区二区不卡视频 | 国产一区二区女内射 | 精品国产aⅴ一区二区三区v视界 | 欧美一区二区三区久久综 | 不卡无码人妻一区二区三区 | 日本成熟少妇喷浆视频 | 嫩草视频一区二区三区精品推荐 | 成人欧美一区二区三区的电影 | 日本免费人成网站在线观看 | 国产精品午夜无码试看 | 2024国产品精品在线不卡 | 国产免费播放一区二区三区 | 高潮喷水在线观看com | 精品久久欧美熟妇www | 成人午夜A片产无码免费视频日本 | 亚洲精华国产精华液的护肤功效 | 国产男人午夜视频在线观看 | 一级做a爰片性色毛片思念网 | 欧美男生射精高潮视频网站 | 91嫩草香蕉国产线懂你的网站 | 日本黄色网址大全 | 色欲影视网站 | 免费国产在线观看老王影院 | 国内精品久久久久影院日本 | 国产亚洲欧美日韩三区电影 | 日韩中文无码一区二区三区 | 中文字幕精品视频在线 | 日韩国产精品无码一区二区三区 | 久久无码精品一区二区 | 91制片厂果冻星空传媒喜剧 | 91天堂一区二区 | 久久精品国产亚洲AV麻 | 二区三区高清人妻 | 久久午夜av无码鲁丝片精品久久真人一级毛片 | 欧洲mv亚洲mv永久入口导航 | 丝袜呻吟自慰喷水直播 | 国产欧美一区二区三区成人 | xxxx你懂得日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕久久 | 91精品国产成人 | 九色在线视频 | 国产成人久久精品77777 | 一区二区无码在线 | 精品熟女少妇av免费久久 | 日本一本专区一区二区三区 | 四虎影视www四虎免费 | 九九日欧美红桃视频 | 欧美午夜小视频 | 自拍欧美在线综合另类 | 国产成人禁片免费观看 | 国产精品久久人妻无码网站一区无 | 久久久久久老熟妇人妻av | 伊人无码视屏 | 亚洲高清综合 | 国产无码在线看免费 | 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡2024 | 国产免费久久精品国产传媒 | 国产精品自在拍首页视频 | 免费看黄在线观看网站 | 久久国产综合视频精品 | 日本欧美中文字幕人在线 | 精品国产成人一区二区 | 日本一区二区视频在线观看 | 92国产精品午夜免费福利视频 | 成人区精品一区二区不卡 | 欧美视频一区二区三区四区 | 国产亚洲色婷婷久久99精品 | jizzjizz国产| 色噜噜狠狠色综合久夜色撩人 | 国产精品伦子一区二区三区 | 五月天少妇手机免播放 | 97久久超碰中文字幕 | 国产视频无码在线观看 | 亚洲蜜桃av永久无码精品放毛 | 成人一区欧美高清夜夜片a 成人一区三区 | 国产欧美日韩高清在线不卡 | 91亚洲无码视频 | 黄色视频一区二免费 | 久久久久久久久久久精品 | 久久久无码精品国产一区 | 波多野结衣二区 | 99久久精品国产一区二区小说 | 精品一区二区三区在线播放视频 | 九九久久精品国产av片国产 | 美臀人妻中出中文字幕在线 | 中文日产乱幕九区无线码 | 97在线观免费视频观看 | 2017国产小视频 | 韩国日本三级在线播放 | 99久久国产综合精品女不卡 | 二区chinese中文字幕资源日本ⅹxxx色 | a级毛片毛片免费观看久潮喷 | 国产精品无码专区 | 国产国产成人精品久久 | 久久久久国产精品免费a片 久久久久国产精品免费s | 国产最新在线一区二区 | 国产国拍亚洲精品av麻豆 | 无码人妻丰满熟妇区毛片18 | 国产欧美另类久久久精品图片 | 国精品无码一区二区三区免费视频 | 日本成a人片在线播放 | 欧美日韩国产中文字幕理论 | 亚洲精品无码国模av | 久久鸡巴热这里有精品 | 天天综合7799精品视频天天 | 2024日本大片免a费观看视频 | 亚洲欧美另类 | 亚洲欧美动漫少妇自拍 | 成熟男女天天操夜夜操 | 精品一线二线三线区别在哪欧美 | 91久久国产香蕉熟女线看 | 久久99久久99精品观看 | 人妻中文无码久热丝袜 | 国产精品白丝喷水jk娇喘视频 | 制服丝祙女教师 | 成年黄网站色视频免费观看 | 人妖欧美一区二区三区四区 | 国产成人无码a区视频在线观看 | 免费av网站 | 国产精品无码mv在线观看 | 99久久国产精品视频 | 精品人妻无码一区二 | 无码精品一区二区三区四区爱奇艺 | 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区久久 | 久久久久国产精品免费看 | 国产精品免费不卡无码av | 国产高清无码在线一区二区 | 国产成人亚洲精品无码av大片 | 精品三级内地国产在线观看 | 少妇无码自慰毛片久久久久 | AV一区AV久久AV无码 | 国产福利电影一区二区三区亚洲国产精 | 日本亚洲天堂网 | 麻生希作品日韩剧手机在线播放 | 精品自拍农村熟女少妇图片直播一区专区 | 国产精品综合一区在线观看 | 中文字幕精品1在线 | 91精品免费久久久久久久久 | xxxx国产 | 国产精品精品自在线拍 | av网页中文字幕 | 裸体无码内射性性色av | 精品动漫无码在线一区二区三区 | 国产国拍亚洲精品av麻豆 | 2024国产在线精品国自产拍 | 波多野结衣强奷系列在线高清在线观看 | 日本女优免费一区 | 久国产视频 | 精品动漫区一区二在线观看 | 精品久久伊人 | 亚洲精品第一国产麻豆 | 中文字幕人妻无码专区 | www夜片内射视频日韩精品成人 | 精品性影院一区二区三区内 | 亚洲av成人一区二区三区 | 国产69精品久久久久久人妻精品 | 中文字幕一区二区三区精华液 | 久久久久久一级毛片免费野外黑人 | 亚洲国产麻豆综合一区 | 国内精品久久久久影院免费 | 久久av无码精品人妻系列果冻传媒 | 色情欧美片午夜国产特黄 | 亚洲欧美天堂网 | 69精品一区二区三区蜜桃 | 青草内射中出高潮 | 欧美性爱极品另类视频播放 | 日韩欧美亚洲色图中文字幕 | 日本一区二区三区免费A片 日本一区二区三区免费高清在线 | 色情图插插插 | 精品国产成人在线 | 日本12一14eenxxxxtv| 97精品人妻一区二区三区香蕉 | 国模大胆一区二区三区 | 五月天婷婷网址 | 国产精品毛片久久久久久久 | 91在线无码精品秘 入口91 | 国模大胆一区二区三区 | 麻花豆传媒MV在线播放智库百科 | 美女大战巨茎黑人 | 亚洲欧美另类都市激情一区 | 东京热无码中文人妻 | 色中色中文| 亚洲国产精品无码专区在线观看 | 亚洲一区在线视频 | 2024无限次数免费在线观影app合集 | 东京热无码a√国产精品 | 99在线精品免费视频 | 中文字幕欧美在线 | 国产精品成熟老妇女 | 97精品人妻一区二 | 老鸭窝亚洲图片欧美一区 | 韩国欧美福利视频一区二区 | 国产美女视频免费观看的网站 | h入口成人精品人伦一区二区三区蜜 | av色综合网 | 麻豆91在线 | 香港三级日本三级韩国三级 | 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩按摩不卡 | 精品无码网址免费不卡 | 久亚洲AV无码专区A片 | 午夜欧美艳情视频免费看 | a级全黄30分钟免费视频 | 成熟人妻AV无码专区A片麻豆 | 亚洲AV无码久久精品色欲 | 2024国产无码免费视频 | 日韩在线手机看片免费看 | 九色综合视频网 | 精品久久久无码大桥未久 | 国产精品久久久久久影院 | 日本一道高清视频1区 | 亚洲综合无码一区二区三区 | 欧美日韩国产综合草草 | 亚洲色婷婷丁香五月 | 亚洲国产午夜精品理论片妓女 | 亚洲爆乳无码精品aaa片蜜桃 | 国产欧美日韩精品二区特 | 人妻系列无码专区无码 | 国产亚洲综合激情校园小说 | 国产爆乳无码视频在 | 丝袜制服第一页 | 夜鲁夜鲁夜鲁视频在线观看 | 国产毛A片久久久久无码 | 精品无码一区二区三区视频在 | 国产日韩精品suv在线观看免费bd完整版 | 日韩一区二区三区免费高清 | 秋霞久久久久久一区二区 | 国产欧美日韩另类精彩视频 | 国产肥熟女一区二区三区 | 91久久国产成人免费观看资源 |